Audio Cross Verification Using Dual Alignment Likelihood Ratio Test
Authors: Heidi Lei, Arm Wonghirundacha, Irmak Bukey, TJ Tsai
Organizations: †Massachusetts Institute of Technology · ‡Pomona College · §Harvey Mudd College
Abstract
This paper explores a way to verify that audio has not been maliciously tampered in a specific context: short viral videos taken from news recordings. Rather than trying to detect artifacts of tampering (internal inconsistency), we focus on positively verifying a query against a trusted source such as a news recording (external consistency). We propose a method for cross verifying a short audio query against a reference recording from which it was taken. Our approach is to define two hypotheses (non-tampered vs tampered), calculate the most likely alignment between query and reference for each hypothesis, and then perform a likelihood ratio test on the two alignments. We show that this method is fast to compute, much more robust than using MFCC features with Euclidean distance, and has the key benefit of explainability. Our cross verification approach provides an alternative perspective and complementary tool to existing tampering detection methods.
With the rapid deployment of speech generation systems in open environments, providing verifiable source attribution and copyright accountability for audio content has become critical. A gap in current research is the lack of a unified benchmark that systematically compares different watermark injection methods under realistic distribution shifts. To address this, we build VoxWatermark by applying 10 watermarking methods (4 neural and 6 traditional) with unified injection and annotation on multilingual, multi-source corpora, and introducing no-box, black-box, and white-box perturbations to simulate real recording and transmission conditions. Based on this benchmark, we propose AudioWMD as a robust baseline detector for large-scale, multi-method, cross-distribution settings. Results show that injection-method diversity and distribution shifts affect detection stability, while validating the effectiveness and scalability of AudioWMD. Dataset and code are publicly available.
Proactive watermarking offers a promising approach for deepfake tamper detection and localization in short-form videos. However, existing methods often decouple audio and visual evidence and assume that watermark signals remain reliable under real-world degradations, making tamper localization vulnerable to multimodal misalignment and compression distortions. Moreover, existing semi-fragile visual watermarking methods often degrade significantly under codec compression because their embedding bands overlap with compression-sensitive frequency regions. To address these limitations, we propose Layered Audio-Visual Anti-tampering Watermarking (LAVA), a calibration-aware audio-visual watermark fusion framework for deepfake tamper detection and localization. LAVA leverages cross-modal watermark fusion and calibration-aware alignment to preserve consistent and reliable tamper evidence under compression and audio-visual asynchrony, enabling robust tamper localization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LAVA achieves near-perfect detection performance (AP = 0.999), remains robust to compression and multimodal misalignment, and significantly improves tamper localization reliability over existing audio-visual fusion baselines.
Audio deepfake detection is commonly formulated as clip-level binary classification of single-domain audio. However, real-world manipulated audio can exhibit mixed authenticity, where genuine and manipulated cues coexist across temporal transitions, overlapping sources, or both. This setting requires not only detecting manipulated audio but also localizing the components that provide evidence for the decision. We propose ToolDF, a tool-integrated reasoning framework for mixed-authenticity audio deepfake detection. ToolDF employs an audio large language model as an orchestrator trained with supervised tool-use trajectories. It adaptively analyzes the audio scene, selectively performs source separation, routes components to domain-specific experts, and aggregates their evidence into an interpretable verdict. We further introduce a mixed-authenticity ADD benchmark covering temporal transitions, acoustic overlaps, and hybrid mixtures. Experimental results show that ToolDF achieves the best overall performance on composite-type detection, achieving macro-F1 gains of 3.72 and 14.39 points over the strongest monolithic baseline and a fixed pipeline, respectively, while providing interpretable evidence localized to temporal regions and acoustic sources. Our source code and dataset are publicly available online.