Integrity-Gated Eco-CACC: Epistemic Admissibility for Cooperative Driving at Signalized Intersections

Vehicle coordination at unsignalized intersections relies on accurate real-time vehicle state acquisition and reliable command-and-control (C&C) signal delivery. However, existing studies typically treat sensing, communication, and control separately, which may lead to redundant transmissions, outdated state information, and unreliable vehicle coordination. In this paper, we investigate a new scenario of distributed integrated sensing and communication (ISAC)-enabled vehicle coordination at intersections, where multiple roadside units (RSUs) collaboratively transmit sensing signals for vehicle state acquisition and C&C signals for vehicle movement control under the management of a central base station (BS). To improve signaling efficiency, we propose a unified goal-oriented semantic communication (GSC) framework, which transmits sensing and C&C signals only when they are semantically important for improving intersection traffic throughput. Specifically, an extended Kalman filter (EKF) is adopted to predict vehicle states and fuse distributed sensing measurements. A masked hybrid proximal policy optimization (MHPPO) framework is then developed to jointly determine sensing transmission decisions, C&C transmission decisions, and C&C signal contents based on a value-of-information (VoI) reward. Furthermore, we propose an uncertainty-aware transmission design (UTD), including robust beamforming and VoI-based time-division power allocation, to improve sensing and communication reliability under vehicle state uncertainty and inter-RSU interference. Simulation results show that our proposed framework achieves 100% collision-free vehicle coordination with significantly reduced signaling overhead compared with predictive ISAC baselines adapted from state-of-the-art related studies and several ablation baselines.

Large language models (LLMs) show strong potential for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), particularly in tasks requiring situational reasoning and multi-agent coordination. These capabilities make them well suited for cooperative driving, where rule-based approaches struggle in complex and dynamic traffic environments. Intersection management remains especially challenging due to conflicting right-of-way demands, heterogeneous vehicle priorities, and vehicle-specific kinematic constraints that must be resolved in real time. However, existing approaches typically use LLMs as auxiliary components on top of signal-based systems rather than as primary decision-makers. Signal controllers remain vehicle-agnostic, reservation-based methods lack intent awareness, and recent LLM-based systems still depend on signal infrastructure. In addition, LLM inference latency limits their use in sub-second control settings. We propose LIDSA (LLM-Based Intent-Driven Speed Advisory), a signal-free cognitive arbitration framework for autonomous intersection management. LIDSA uses an LLM to reason over declared vehicle intents, incorporating priority classes, queue pressure, and energy preferences. We evaluate LIDSA against fixed-cycle control, SCATS, AIM, and GLOSA across varying traffic loads. Results show that LIDSA reduces mean control delay by up to 89.1% and maintains Level of Service C while all non-LLM baselines degrade to Level of Service F. Under near-saturated demand, LIDSA reduces mean waiting time by 93% and peak queue length by 60.6% relative to fixed-cycle control. It also lowers fuel consumption by up to 48.8% and achieves 86.2% intent satisfaction, compared to 61.2% for the best non-LLM method. These results demonstrate that LLM-based reasoning can enable real-time, signal-free intersection management.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated considerable potential for autonomous driving decision-making. However, its deployment in urban autonomous driving, particularly at highly interactive unsignalized intersections, remains challenging, as learned policies may struggle to maintain both safety and robust decision-making in complex traffic situations. Conventional safety-filtering approaches typically employ fixed conservative constraints, which may improve safety at the cost of excessive intervention and degraded traffic efficiency. To address these limitations, we propose a Risk-sensitive and Uncertainty-aware Decision-making and Control (RUDC) framework for safe and robust autonomous driving. RUDC couples risk-sensitive distributional RL with ensemble-based policy uncertainty quantification, jointly accounting for tail risks in return distributions and uncertainty in learned policies. An uncertainty-aware high-order control barrier function (HOCBF)-based safety correction mechanism adaptively adjusts constraint strictness according to policy uncertainty, while a learnable residual predictor compensates for CBF model mismatches and discretization errors. Extensive simulations at unsignalized intersections demonstrate that RUDC achieves a favorable balance among safety, efficiency, and robustness, outperforming representative safe RL baselines under both nominal and challenging OOD and long-tail scenarios while satisfying real-time requirements.