q-bio.NCJul 21, 2026

How the fly holds a single goal: normalization, not selection, in Drosophila FC2

Authors: Gioele Nanni, Christopher Lee

Organizations: Common Origin

Abstract

A walking fly steers toward a goal direction, held as a bump of activity across the FC2 neurons of the fan-shaped body. These neurons also inhibit one another over distance, more strongly the farther apart they are, a feedback proposed to keep the fly on a single goal. We asked, from the connectome, what circuit produces this inhibition, and whether it lets FC2 actively choose one goal among competitors (a winner-take-all) or simply keeps a goal set elsewhere as one clean bump. Tracing the wiring in a single FlyWire brain, we find the inhibition is almost entirely global: four FB5A cells inhibit every FC2 neuron roughly equally, with a smaller, distance-dependent contribution from hDelta interneurons and a negligible direct component. A ring-attractor winner-take-all (the kind the compass uses) requires local recurrent excitation that the FC2 wiring lacks, so this geometry cannot build one; and across a range of dynamical models, including a spiking network, no version of the circuit locks onto a winner at the connectome-scaled reference coupling. FC2 therefore normalizes an externally set goal rather than selecting it, with FB5A likely acting as the global normalizer, much as the APL neuron does in the mushroom body. We are explicit about two open points: a different mechanism, mutual inhibition between two competing goals (which hDelta supplies), could in principle select at very strong coupling, and we bound rather than exclude it; and FB5A's inhibitory identity is a low-confidence prediction of the connectome's transmitter classifier, not yet measured, and likely not GABAergic. We then ask where the goal is actually set: the connectome nominates an upstream hDelta network and rules out the leading proposed alternative, whose neurons supply under 0.2% of FC2's input. Finally, we propose a direct experiment, silencing FB5A while imaging FC2, that would test the account.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jun 21, 2026cs.RO

FLYNN: Robust Neural Network for Robot Navigation using Fly Brain Topology

While deep learning models achieve state-of-the-art performance in complex tasks, they remain brittle when faced with new environments or sensory deprivation. In contrast, biological systems exhibit remarkable tolerance to these challenges. We address this vulnerability by developing a recurrent neural network (RNN) whose architecture is directly derived from the synaptic-resolution brain connectome of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. We demonstrate the feasibility of training the fly connectome neural network (FLYNN) to perform vision-based navigation in MuJoCo, achieving performance comparable to modern hand-crafted networks of similar parameter counts. Crucially, FLYNN exhibits superior resistance to out-of-distribution (OOD) data and tolerance to sensory loss without further training. It remained functional even under total vision loss while hand-crafted networks largely failed, even when specifically trained with camera dropout. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the internal state of FLYNN suggests that it exhibits a particularly high degree of representational modularity, which might be related to its robustness. Our work provides a new direction for designing resilient artificial agents following the topology of biological brains.
Benquan Wang, Jingdao Chen
Recurrent Neural NetworksBrain Connectome ModalityNeural ControlDeep Q-NetworksBrainTopological Data Analysis+1
AskPDF
Jun 2, 2026q-bio.NC

Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity Stabilizes Goal-Conditioned Dynamics in a PFC-Inspired Reservoir Model for Multistep Goal-Directed Action Planning

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) maintains goal information for action planning, but how recurrent circuits preserve it in an action-usable form over behavioral timescales remains unclear. Here we ask whether short-term synaptic plasticity (STP) can stabilize goal information as action-usable, goal-conditioned dynamics. We incorporated STP into a PFC-inspired reservoir computing model with basal-ganglia-inspired temporal-difference readout learning, and evaluated paired models with and without STP across 100 independently generated networks in a multistep goal-directed action-selection task with delayed execution. Goal identity was highly decodable during the delay even without STP, so STP was not required to form a linearly readable goal representation. Under state noise, however, success without STP fell from 75.8% to 49.5%, whereas the model with STP remained essentially unchanged (91.8% without noise versus 89.2% under noise; paired Cohen's dz=1.31). Time-resolved decoding, state-space separability, and action-value-difference analyses showed that STP preserved goal information as action-relevant goal-conditioned dynamics available at later action opportunities. Gain-matched and STP-state perturbation controls argued against a simple fixed recurrent-scaling explanation and supported online, history-dependent synaptic modulation. Effective-connectivity analyses showed delay-period goal-specific patterning that increased toward the later part of the trial with STP, where it should be read as goal- and task-state-conditioned patterning; effective connectivity without STP was time-invariant. A grid search identified a facilitation-dominant range of STP time constants associated with high success rates. These results suggest that STP supports robust goal-conditioned dynamics through dynamic modulation of goal-dependent effective recurrent connectivity.
Jin Nakamura, Yuichi Katori
Synaptic PlasticityHuman Visual CortexClassical PlanningDelayReservoir
AskPDF
Jul 27, 2026cs.CL

Neural Circuit Function Inference with LLMs

The success of connectome mapping now shifts the challenge of understanding the nervous system to the interpretation of neural circuits. Here, we devise a new automated method, LLantia (LLM automated neural circuit inference and analysis), to systematically infer neural circuit function and the role of its component neural cell types. Our approach distills descriptions of cell type function from the literature and, in combination with the connectome, then infers the function for all other cell types, which serves as a basis for subsequent neural circuit function inference. Results are structured hierarchically, with different possible circuit functions organised under multiple possible behavioural and physiological contexts, and each circuit function composed of subcircuit descriptions alongside relevant cell types to facilitate both backtracking to known, published information and support further experimental research. We illustrate our method by inferring cell type function for all cell types of the adult fruit fly brain and for select broader circuits within, and validate our findings, including by cross-checking with literature published after the release date of our analysis.
Yijie Yin, Albert Cardona
Brain Connectome ModalityCircuits
AskPDF