cs.LGJul 21, 2026

Thermodynamics-Informed Input Reparameterization for Neural Prediction of Real-Fluid Thermodynamic Properties in Supercritical Combustion

Authors: Haoze Zhang, Han Li, Ke Xiao, Yangchen Xu, Runze Mao, Zhi X. Chen

Organizations: State Key Laboratory of Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China · AI for Science Institute (AISI), Beijing 100080, China

Abstract

Real-fluid thermodynamic property evaluation is a major computational cost in supercritical combustion simulations. In the enthalpy-based pressure-correction formulation, the closure evaluates temperature T, density ρρ, and compressibility coefficient ψψ from the solver state (h,p,Y) through enthalpy-temperature inversion and repeated real-fluid equation-of-state evaluations. Neural-network surrogates offer fixed-cost inference, but direct mapping from (h,p,Y) to (T,ρ,ψ)(T,ρ,ψ) must capture the enthalpy-temperature relation and non-ideal equation-of-state response, resulting in a complex regression problem. This work introduces a thermodynamics-informed input reparameterization strategy, termed target-aligned input reparameterization (TAIR). TAIR replaces the raw enthalpy coordinate of each property network with a target-matched thermodynamic coordinate: the temperature network uses a temperature estimate obtained by inverting a constant-cpc_p ideal-gas mixture enthalpy approximation, whereas the density and compressibility networks use an ideal-gas density estimate. These algebraic transformations use only solver-available variables and species constants, guiding the networks to learn real-fluid departures from ideal-gas baselines rather than reconstructing the full closure from raw enthalpy. The method is assessed using supercritical methane-oxygen counterflow flame data against a raw-input baseline and target-inconsistent cross-reparameterization controls. TAIR reduces held-out RMSE by factors of about 1.5, 2.0, and 7.5 for T, ρρ, and ψψ, respectively. For an unseen strain-rate flame within the augmented thermodynamic envelope, the corresponding factors are 3.6, 14.5, and 6.0. The target-inconsistent controls perform worse, indicating that the gains arise from thermodynamically matched input design rather than generic preprocessing.

Explore similar work

CardsList