cs.LGJul 23, 2026

New Complexity-Theoretic Frontiers of Tractability for Neural Network Training

Authors: Cornelius BrandRobert GanianMathis Rocton

Organizations: Algorithms & Complexity Group Vienna University of Technology Favoritenstraße 9-11, 1040 Vienna, Austria

Abstract

In spite of the fundamental role of neural networks in contemporary machine learning research, our understanding of the computational complexity of optimally training neural networks remains incomplete even when dealing with the simplest kinds of activation functions. Indeed, while there has been a number of very recent results that establish ever-tighter lower bounds for the problem under linear and ReLU activation functions, less progress has been made towards the identification of novel polynomial-time tractable network architectures. In this article we obtain novel algorithmic upper bounds for training linear- and ReLU-activated neural networks to optimality which push the boundaries of tractability for these problems beyond the previous state of the art. In particular, for ReLU networks we establish the polynomial-time tractability of all architectures where hidden neurons have an out-degree of 11, improving upon the previous algorithm of Arora, Basu, Mianjy and Mukherjee. On the other hand, for networks with linear activation functions we identify the first non-trivial polynomial-time solvable class of networks by obtaining an algorithm that can optimally train network architectures satisfying a novel data throughput condition.

Explore similar work

Feb 12, 2026cs.LG

Rational Neural Networks have Expressivity Advantages

We study neural networks with trainable low-degree rational activation functions and show that they are more expressive and parameter-efficient than modern piecewise-linear and smooth activations such as ELU, LeakyReLU, LogSigmoid, PReLU, ReLU, SELU, CELU, Sigmoid, SiLU, Mish, Softplus, Tanh, Softmin, Softmax, and LogSoftmax. For an error target of ε>0\varepsilon>0, we establish approximation-theoretic separations: Any network built from standard fixed activations can be uniformly approximated on compact domains by a rational-activation network with only poly(loglog(1/ε))\mathrm{poly}(\log\log(1/\varepsilon)) overhead in size, while the converse provably requires Ω(log(1/ε))Ω(\log(1/\varepsilon)) parameters in the worst case. This exponential gap persists at the level of full networks and extends to gated activations and transformer-style nonlinearities. In practice, rational activations integrate seamlessly into standard architectures and training pipelines, allowing rationals to match or outperform fixed activations under identical architectures and optimizers.
Maosen Tang, Alex Townsend
Jun 25, 2026cs.LG

Algorithmic Foundations of Deep Learning: Complexity-Theoretic Rates and a Characterization of Universal Approximation

Feedforward neural network (NN) expressivity is typically studied by emulating optimal basis-expansion schemes. While powerful, this perspective is incomplete: it primarily captures complexity through regularity, and therefore does not distinguish intuitively simple and complicated objects with comparable regularity, such as the square-root function and a typical Brownian path. The guiding message is that neural networks should be viewed not only as flexible basis functions, but also as models of computation. If a function is computable by a real-valued circuit over a prescribed elementary gate language, then it can be computed to comparable accuracy by an NN with explicit depth, width, and non-zero-parameter bounds controlled by the depth, width, gate count, and gate structure. Thus, neural-network complexity is not governed by regularity alone, but also by algorithmic complexity. We then show that any definable NN model satisfying a natural parallelization condition, allowing possibly multivariate non-linearities such as attention or layer normalization, is a universal approximator if and only if it contains a non-affine nonlinearity. The scope of our theory is illustrated by deducing universal approximation guarantees for continuous functions, minimax-optimal approximation guarantees for Besov classes, logarithmic-error complexity for holomorphic functions, and by showing that NNs can emulate numerical algorithms such as Newton-Raphson root finding and power iteration without architecture-specific arguments. Its precision is illustrated by shortest-path computation on kk-vertex graphs: compiling the tropical dynamic-programming circuit yields NNs with O(log(1/ε)) non-zero parameters, exponentially improving in 1/ε over the generic O(εck2)O(ε^{-c k^2}) Lipschitz-approximation scale, for a constant c>0.
Anastasis Kratsios, Simone Brugiapaglia, Bum Jun Kim +2
Aug 24, 2026cs.LG

Every Layer Counts: An Exponential L_2 Depth Hierarchy for ReLU Networks

We prove a depth hierarchy for ReLU neural networks in which every additional ReLU layer can save exponentially many neurons. For all k2k\geq2, we construct a globally [0,1][0,1]-valued, 11-Lipschitz function realized by a depth-(k+1)(k+1) network of width O(d4)\mathcal{O}(d^4), whereas any depth-kk network with unrestricted weights and width at most 2d2d(k1)\frac{2^d}{2d(k-1)} has squared L2L_2 error at least 1/241/24 under an absolutely continuous distribution supported at exponential distance from the origin. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first exponential hierarchy across all adjacent fixed depths, and the first exponential separation for ReLU networks between two fixed depths whose shallower network has depth at least 33. The lower bound also immediately yields the corresponding hierarchy for exact computation. Moreover, the case k=2k=2 gives a compactly supported separation between depths 33 and 22 with unrestricted shallow-network weights, answering a question raised by Safran, Eldan, and Shamir (2019). The distribution used in our construction nevertheless has all its mass at exponential radius, placing the hierarchy outside the regularity regime in which such a separation would imply major threshold-circuit lower bounds. We also prove an exact separation for a more regular target, which is globally [0,1][0,1]-valued and O(d)\mathcal{O}(\sqrt d)-Lipschitz and maps the unit hypercube onto [0,1][0,1]. It is computed by a polynomial-width depth-44 network, whereas any depth-33 network agreeing with it on the unit hypercube requires exponentially many first-layer neurons, even with unrestricted weights.
Itay Safran