Relative Value Learning

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for Large Reasoning Models hinges on baseline estimation for variance reduction, but existing approaches pay a heavy price: PPO requires a policy-model scale critic, while GRPO needs multiple rollouts per prompt to keep its empirical group mean stable. We introduce Policy Optimization with Internal State Value Estimation), which obtains a baseline at negligible cost by using the policy model's internal signals already computed during the policy forward pass. A lightweight probe predicts the expected verifiable reward from the hidden states of the prompt and generated trajectory, as well as token-entropy statistics, and is trained online alongside the policy. To preserve gradient unbiasedness despite using trajectory-conditioned features, we introduce a cross-rollout construction that predicts each rollout's value from an independent rollout's internal states. Because POISE estimates prompt value using only a single rollout, it enables higher prompt diversity for a fixed compute budget during training. This reduces gradient variance for more stable learning and also eliminates the compute overhead of sampling costs for detecting zero-advantage prompts. On Qwen3-4B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B across math reasoning benchmarks, POISE matches DAPO while requiring less compute. Moreover, its value estimator shows similar performance to a separate LLM-scale value model and generalizes to various verifiable tasks. By leveraging the model's own internal representations, POISE enables more stable and efficient policy optimization.

Designing effective reward functions remains a major challenge in reinforcement learning (RL), particularly in open-ended environments where task goals are abstract and difficult to quantify. In this work, we present VLM-AR3L, a framework that leverages Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to provide both absolute and relative rewards for RL. VLM-AR3L interprets an agent's visual observations in the context of a natural language task goal, and learns both absolute and relative rewards from VLM-generated preference labels. The absolute reward model predicts scalar evaluations for individual states, while the relative reward model compares consecutive observations to infer progress or regression toward the task goal. Their integration combines the stability of state-based evaluation with the robustness of comparative supervision. We evaluate VLM-AR3L across benchmarks spanning classic control, manipulation, and open-world embodied tasks, with a particular focus on Minecraft given its visual complexity and long-horizon decision-making requirements. Experimental results show that VLM-AR3L consistently outperforms prior VLM-based reward learning methods.

Reliable temporal-difference targets are central to off-policy actor-critic learning. Direct value improvement refines the next-state target with alternative actions, but the reliability of this refinement depends on how candidate actions are ranked, reviewed, and weighted. Noisy rankings may force premature candidate commitment, reusing selection scores may bias target valuation, and fixed enhancement weights may amplify weak evidence. To address these risks, we develop Conservative Adaptive Ranking and Screening (CARS), which retains an ordered candidate prefix within a preset budget and narrows it only when the observed boundary gap exceeds a disagreement-scaled uncertainty radius. Selector-Evaluator Value Assessment (SEVA) uses selector critics to order candidates and a separately parameterized evaluator critic to review the selected value, then caps the reviewed value at the selector reference. Dynamic Adaptive Risk-aware Enhancement (DARE) then regulates each residual correction using candidate reliability, the gap between selector and evaluator signals, and a finite stage factor. Together, CARS, SEVA, and DARE form CARE-VI, an evidence-regulated target construction framework that preserves the backbone interfaces for critic regression and actor updates. The analysis bounds the CARS boundary error, the SEVA selected-value overestimation, and the one-sided deviation of the DARE residual displacement from its population counterpart, and establishes fixed-policy recovery after the finite-stage perturbation ends. Experiments with SAC, TD3, and TD7 on four MuJoCo tasks show that CARE-VI achieves the highest mean return in all twelve settings. Grouped ablations and scalar diagnostics support the roles of the three components in improving target reliability.