Evolving Self-Organising Agents Without Fitness: Three Falsifiable Experiments from Constraint-Driven Selection to Developmental Encoding

Biological evolution sustains complex dynamics without any fitness function, yet virtually all evolutionary algorithms depend on one. Genesis is an open-source platform designed to test, empirically, what an artificial system needs to sustain evolutionary dynamics after complete fitness removal. Evolution in Genesis is governed by physical constraints, relational dominance, and adaptive regulation - no scalar fitness, no designer-specified objectives. Across experiments totalling over one million evolutionary generations, Genesis has: (i) shown that constraint-driven selection can sustain evolutionary activity after complete fitness removal (7/12 runs; Wilson 95% CI [30.2%, 82.5%]; p<0.01, Cohen's d=1.47 vs. baselines); (ii) produced a sham-controlled negative result demonstrating that niche construction alone does not break the complexity plateau; and (iii) provided preliminary evidence that speciation-protected niche construction initiates structural diversification that unprotected secretion cannot. These findings establish empirical boundaries for fitness-free evolution and open a new direction: meta-evolution of physics, in which the laws governing an evolutionary system are themselves evolved.

Open-ended evolution (OEE) in artificial life is typically driven by uninterpretable, black-box neural-network complexity metrics, leaving life-like systems disconnected from physical theories of complexity. We introduce MSPD (Multi-Scale Path Divergence, denoted DP ), a renormalization-group-inspired scalar that quantifies the temporal multiscale organization of heterogeneity in local transition laws. MSPD is defined at the population level as a functional of the realised trajectory and is computed as a windowed finite-resolution estimator, with consistency between the two stated as a proposition. The metric is an explicit formula and plays a dual role: as a gradient-free fitness function and as a post-hoc analytical lens on any simulation that exposes local transition laws. Empirically, MSPD-optimized parameters produce higher held-out complexity scores than matched random parameters from the same substrate. High-$H_{Delta_t}$ states correspond to states with higher instability to external interventions, so the metric tracks the biology of the underlying dynamics rather than noise. Higher MSPD corresponds to stronger scale-dependent frustration: high-complexity systems exhibit larger differences between the dynamics expressed at different spatial extents, linking MSPD directly to the frustration criterion of biological complexity in the sense of Vanchurin et al. [ 23 ]. The same protocol transfers beyond the primary Flow-Lenia substrate to Life-like cellular automata and Particle Life++, where C1, C2 and C5 all hold. A single explicit formula thus both directs open-ended evolution and provides a principled bridge to the physics of complexity that black-box drivers do not.

Indirectly encoded neural networks can assign different activation functions to individual nodes, but the right functions are rarely known in advance. When the available set contains only standard monotonic functions, problems like parity become unsolvable, yet an all-inclusive palette underperforms a curated one. How should evolution discover which functions to use? We address this as a meta-learning problem, designing 13 strategies (11 inspired by biological adaptation mechanisms, plus baseline and oracle controls) that modify the set of available activation functions during evolution. Each strategy translates a biological principle into an evolutionary operator: for example, circadian-inspired oscillatory gating cycles functions in and out of the palette on a fixed schedule, while immune-inspired Clonal Selection permanently protects functions that consistently correlate with fitness. We evaluate all strategies across more than 3,000 runs on parity and non-parity problems, first evolving the activation palette alone, then co-evolving a per-node aggregation palette on harder problems; an independent replication with new seeds confirms a stable high-reliability tier, with Circadian holding its top rank. Bio-inspired strategies match the solve rate of a tuned baseline but converge up to twice as fast, with Circadian halving total compute. Strategy rankings reverse across problem types, with no strategy dominating all domains. Strategy success is largely shaped by timescale compatibility: strategies whose characteristic timescale matches the evolutionary evaluation window consistently outperform those that operate too slowly. The practical guideline: match the mechanism's timescale to the evaluation budget. Rescaling the slowest strategy bypasses the oscillatory barrier entirely: all nine solutions solve parity with non-oscillatory activations paired with min or max aggregation.