GLI-AL: A Multi-Modal Glioma MRI Label Resource with Unified Anatomy-Lesion Labels

Tracking residual tumor after surgery is essential for catching recurrence early, but automating post-operative glioma segmentation remains a difficult task. Although transformer-based architectures, such as SwinUNETR, achieved impressive results, few studies test how well they generalize across clinical protocols. In this paper, we conduct an ablation study on the MU-GLIOMA-POST and UCSF-ALPTDG datasets and show that the standard Generalized Dice Loss (GDL) is unstable under domain shift: the Whole Lesion (WL) Dice drops from 0.88 on the internal validation set to 0.73 on the external UCSF test set. To address this, we pair brain-masked percentile normalization with voxel-level contrastive learning. We also propose a Subspace-Aware Class Attention (SACA) module that re-calibrates the bottleneck features and raises Enhancing Tumor (ET) sensitivity by 8% (9.1% relative improvement) on internal validation. Ensembling these refinements with nnU-Net brings every stable configuration to a WL Dice of 0.94, and the SACA variant ensemble achieves the best boundary error (HD95) of 2.92 mm on MU-GLIOMA-POST.

Background: Accurate glioma subregion delineation is important for radiotherapy planning and longitudinal monitoring, but manual contour correction is time-consuming. Models such as nnU-Net may generalize imperfectly and lack clinician-directed text correction. Purpose: We investigated adapting a three-dimensional (3D) vision-language foundation model for text-guided brain tumor segmentation refinement. Methods: We developed a lightweight VoxTell-based framework. Pretrained VoxTell generated initial masks. Oracle prompts derived from segmentation errors encoded target, action, location, imaging evidence, edit size, and preservation constraints. Frozen Qwen/VoxTell prompt embeddings were injected through trainable projections into its multiscale decoder conditioning; other weights remained frozen. Training, validation, and testing used 901, 100, and 250 BraTS-GLI cases. Cross-dataset transfer was evaluated on 100 meningioma, metastasis, pediatric tumor, and UPENN-GBM cases. Results: On the internal test set using post-contrast T1-weighted input, correct instructions improved subregion Dice similarity coefficient (DSC; enhancing tumor, edema, and necrotic/non-enhancing core) from $0.774\pm0.158$ to $0.796\pm0.137$. They outperformed blank prompts ($0.762\pm0.155$; Holm-adjusted $p<0.001$, $d_z=0.71$) and contradictory prompts ($0.770\pm0.163$; $p<0.001$, $d_z=0.48$). In cross-dataset testing, correct instructions improved DSC from $0.527\pm0.287$ to $0.550\pm0.278$ and outperformed contradictory instructions ($0.504\pm0.275$; $p<0.001$, $d_z=0.43$). Conclusion: A 3D vision-language foundation model can perform instruction-guided refinement of glioma subregion segmentations. Sensitivity to correct, blank, and contradictory prompts suggests text-dependent contour editing rather than nonspecific post-processing, supporting further evaluation as a clinician-in-the-loop tool.

Multimodal medical large language models remain structurally weak for neuro-oncology because volumetric evidence is compressed into generic visual tokens and diagnostic conclusions often lack an auditable link to MRI regions. We present NeuroMosaic, a 3D multimodal language model that converts multi-sequence brain MRI into anatomy-indexed regional tokens, aligns them with clinical narrative and molecular concepts, and generates evidence-linked outputs. The architecture combines a multi-resolution volumetric tokenizer, a neuroanatomical graph router, a molecular concept memory, and selective risk control. Across four glioma cohorts, NeuroMosaic achieved an internal subtype macro-F1 of 0.827 and external macro-F1 values of 0.784, 0.761, and 0.742. On UPenn-GBM, it improved over the strongest matched-input baseline by 3.6 percentage points (95% CI: 1.8 to 5.4, adjusted p = 0.0018), with IDH, 1p/19q, and MGMT AUROCs of 0.918, 0.861, and 0.781. Evidence pointing accuracy reached 0.703, and targeted evidence deletion reduced correct-answer probability by 0.187, compared with 0.046 for random deletion. These results establish anatomy-indexed routing as a measurable mechanism for accurate, grounded, and calibrated volumetric medical-language reasoning.