ParasGB: A Graph Benchmark Suite for Parasitic Estimation on AMS Circuits

Accurately predicting the performance of active radio frequency (RF) circuits is essential for modern wireless systems but remains challenging due to highly nonlinear behavior and the high computational cost of traditional simulation tools. Existing machine learning (ML) surrogates often require large datasets to generalize across various topologies or are not accurate on held-out circuits. This work presents a lightweight, data-efficient, and topology-aware graph neural network (GNN) framework for predicting key performance metrics of active RF circuit classes, such as low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), mixers, voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs), power amplifiers (PAs), and voltage amplifiers (VAs). The proposed framework employs RFIC domain-informed feature indexing to enable cross-topology adaptability by cheap encoding of functional device semantics (e.g., differential pair and varactor transistors) and efficient knowledge transfer. The surrogate model represents circuits using device-terminal graph abstractions to preserve fine-grained connectivity and transistor-level symmetry. The final model is generalized to a wide variety of classes by being trained in parallel. Experimental results demonstrate accurate modeling of multimodal and heavy-tailed RF performance distributions, achieving an average mean relative error (MRE) of 2.71% across nineteen topologies, an improvement of 3.3x and 20x faster in training over prior art, and the generalization to held-out topologies is improved by ~26.2x. Furthermore, this work shows ~36x training data efficiency compared to state-of-the-art, demonstrating its effectiveness for scalable and deployment-ready RF design automation.

EDA problems are graph-structured, but not all graph-structured problems call for the same GNN computation. We argue that successful GNN-for-EDA methods are those whose propagation, aggregation, and supervision align with the native algebra of the target task. Concretely: static timing analysis is a max-plus/min-plus recurrence on a topologically ordered DAG, structurally aligned with asynchronous DAG-GNNs; placement is governed by hypergraph wirelength and density penalties and is exploited by differentiable placers rather than by message-passing GNNs alone; routing congestion is a sparse demand-supply field over a layout grid; switching-activity propagation is a probabilistic recurrence on a directed netlist; IR drop is a linear system on the power-delivery network; and analog symmetry extraction is a discrete constraint-prediction problem on schematic graphs. Through these task-by-task alignments we (i) review the GNN architectural toolkit relevant to circuits, (ii) formalize how circuit graphs differ from generic graphs (directed, heterogeneous, multi-scale, with sequential and clock structure), (iii) characterize where current methods succeed and where the algebra-architecture mismatch limits them, and (iv) identify failure modes--stage leakage, proxy-to-signoff gap, calibration, and design-distribution shift--that we believe are likely to dominate the next phase of work. We position the paper as a GNN-for-EDA, task-aligned analysis rather than a comprehensive AI-for-chip-design survey. Continuous SE(3)-equivariant geometric GNNs are usually mismatched to Manhattan digital layout, and LLM-for-RTL, HLS, and RL/diffusion-based topology generation are outside our scope.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become the dominant framework for inductive graph-level learning. Yet most benchmarks focus on the regime $n \gg p$, where the number of graphs $n$ greatly exceeds the number of nodes per graph $p$. This overlooks biological domains such as omics, which operate in the opposite $n \ll p$ regime, characterized by large graphs of genes, transcripts, or proteins across few patient samples. This raises the question: \textit{how do GNNs perform in this low-sample, high-node omics setting?} We introduce \texttt{OgBench} (Omics-Graph Bench), the first benchmarking platform for graph-level prediction in the $n \ll p$ regime characteristic of omics data. We provide a standardized, end-to-end modular infrastructure from raw omics data to families of featured graphs with varied structural properties. We benchmark classical GNNs, as well as GNNs designed for large graphs and omics applications, alongside MLPs and machine learning baselines to establish reference performances. Our results show that widely used GNNs often do not outperform simple MLPs and classical baselines. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that graph structure inherently adds value in this domain, fostering a critical reassessment of current learning paradigms. Ultimately, by exposing these limitations, OgBench provides the open-source ecosystem necessary for the community to develop and validate novel architectures explicitly tailored for biological graphs. The code is available at https://github.com/geometric-intelligence/ogbench.