Decision trees, Frobenius traces, and Weierstrass coefficients of elliptic curves

We train a two-layer transformer encoder to classify rational elliptic curves $E/\mathbb{Q}$ of conductor $\leq 10000$ as either rank 0 or rank 1 from the first 128 normalized Frobenius traces. We achieve >99% accuracy on both classes, and accuracy is essentially unchanged on test curves with no isogeny or quadratic-twist relative in the training set. We then apply techniques from mechanistic interpretability such as attention analysis, linear probing, activation patching, logit attribution, and neuron-level circuit analysis to reverse-engineer the algorithm the (centroid in function space) model learned. We find that a sparse circuit of 20 out of 512 layer-1 MLP neurons is sufficient for rank prediction under a linear probe with an AUROC of 0.992 at plateau, implementing a push-pull detector architecture of rank-0 and rank-1 detectors with a one-sided readout. However, we notice that the model has sub-optimal readout problems indicating a mismatch in rank-order between the readout pathway and the discriminative circuit. Critically, the learned input weights of the top discriminating neuron match the Mestre-Nagao sum heuristic weights $\log(p)/(p\cdot \log{B})$ with a Spearman coefficient $r = 0.997$ and Pearson coefficient $r = 0.952$: the model has learnt a result from analytic number theory from the Frobenius trace data alone. We additionally find that all 50 independently trained models concentrate CLS attention on prime positions at 2-50$\times$ the rate of composite positions. The CLS embedding encodes $\log{L(E,1)}$ with $R^2 = 0.962\pm 0.011$ across the 50 models (after controlling for the conductor). Activation patching analysis reveals that attention weights are dissociated from causal information flow. Additionally, the 50 solutions from training are near-identical in function space (with pairwise agreement $>$98.8%) despite large weight space barriers.

Tractability tests are often computed from input syntax: support-graph treewidth, local coefficient patterns, backdoor tests, or action-count bounds. Before such a test can be lower-bounded or made algorithmic, it must define a predicate on the exact-certification problem itself. Equivalent presentations must receive the same verdict. The semantic object is the correctness quotient, whose classes are states with the same correct outputs. Correctness-preserving presentation moves generate closure orbits. A target that changes inside one closure orbit has an orbit gap and fails descent. Exact closure-invariant classification is possible exactly when the positive and negative orbit hulls are disjoint; the positive hull is then the least exact classifier, and computable orbit representatives make the classifier algorithmic. The results separate three layers. The descent layer gives orbit-gap obstructions for raw local syntax, raw action and coordinate counts, and raw support-graph predicates. The post-descent complexity layer applies ordinary reductions to descended objects: graph-predicate lower bounds transfer through action-gap graph extraction, and Action-Gap-Treewidth is NP-complete when the width bound is part of the input. The certification layer asks whether a proxy descends: for split proxies $b\wedge\varphi(z)$, SAT reduces to non-descent and UNSAT reduces to descent. Positive regimes use quotient-preserving normalizations or catalogues before model checking; bounded quotient size, bounded full Gaifman treewidth of the constructed quotient, sparse unary-gap certificates, and strict-margin perturbation balls give explicit cost bounds after quotient construction.

The Lenstra-Lenstra-Lovász (LLL) algorithm is a seminal contribution to computer science used for lattice basis reduction, yet its polynomial-time outputs produce bases that are far from optimal as the dimension grows. We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover strictly superior, generalizable reduction strategies by interacting with the primitive action space of LLL. We formulate lattice reduction as a single-player Markov Decision Process (MDP) and train a deep residual network using an AlphaZero-style self-play pipeline augmented with adaptive-horizon MCTS (Monte Carlo Tree Search), which couples multi-step network predictions with an entropy-gated expansion mechanism. The resulting policy, DeltaStar, is trained exclusively on small $8$-dimensional $q$-ary lattices and requires fewer primitive row operations than LLL. Crucially, it generalizes zero-shot to unseen moduli and higher dimensions up to $n=32$ without retraining.