PreDiff-LM: Pretrained Discrete Masked Diffusion Language Modeling with Hybrid Attention

Adapting a pretrained autoregressive (AR) model is a cost-efficient route to a diffusion language model (DLM). While nearly all such adaptations start from a full-attention transformer, AR modeling has shifted toward hybrid architectures that interleave attention and RNN layers. This creates an obstacle for adaptation: unlike attention, RNNs are structurally causal and nontrivial to bidirectionalize. Despite this mismatch, we investigate whether such backbones can become effective DLMs by adapting Qwen3.5 at 0.8B, 2B, 4B, and 9B scales, yielding the dQwen3.5 family. We find that hybrid backbones can be efficient starting points for adaptation: against a full-attention control, the hybrid reaches a given training loss in about half the tokens. Across scales, dQwen3.5 resembles full-attention DLMs in any-order decoding behavior and performs strongly under parallel decoding.

Existing methods mainly adapt pretrained autoregressive (AR) language models to masked diffusion, whereas we directly adapt them to uniform-noise diffusion, where every token remains editable during sampling. However, adapting AR checkpoints across corruption kernels remains challenging because existing DLMs use different objectives and prediction parameterizations. We establish connections among SEDD, MDLM/GIDD, M2S, and Neural CTMC by expressing their conditional losses as a single generalized Kullback--Leibler objective over model reverse rates. We further derive conversions from clean-token predictions to concrete-score, posterior-mean, and exit-rate/jump parameterizations, yielding a shared $x_0$ interface that supports switching between mask and uniform kernels. Building on these connections, we propose \ours{}, a simple continual pre-training approach for directly adapting pretrained GPT2 checkpoints to uniform-noise diffusion. Through systematic evaluation of 124M- and 355M-parameter models, we show that \ours{} steadily improves the trade-off between generative perplexity (GenPPL) and unigram entropy as the sampling budget increases from 16 to 256 steps. At 256 steps, \ours{}-S and \ours{}-M achieve GenPPL/entropy pairs of $97.783/5.2626$ and $71.516/5.6669$, respectively; no evaluated model at the same scale simultaneously outperforms \ours{} on both metrics. At both scales, \ours{} also achieves the highest WinoGrande, SIQA, and BBH accuracy among the compared diffusion models.

Post-training pretrained autoregressive models (ARMs) into masked diffusion models (MDMs) provides an efficient route to diffusion language modeling, but it remains unclear whether the resulting models reuse inherited autoregressive computation or reorganize it for non-autoregressive generation. We compare two 7B ARM-MDM families across four controlled diagnostic tasks and find a task-dependent mechanism shift. On prefix-dominant tasks, MDMs largely preserve inherited high-attribution pathways or exhibit only modest changes in where computation occurs. On globally constrained tasks, the reorganization is substantially stronger, with task-relevant computation shifting toward earlier layers. This depth-wise pattern persists across prompt resampling, circuit budgets, and tested inference budgets, while targeted ablations support the functional importance of the identified structures under the tested intervention protocols. At the component level, diagnostic probes suggest that ARMs rely more strongly on sharply specialized components, whereas MDMs exhibit weaker single-component specialization and more diffuse output-space alignment. Together, these results suggest that diffusion post-training selectively preserves or reorganizes inherited computation according to task structure, rather than uniformly replacing autoregressive mechanisms.