Wikipedia and Wikidata are widely used for information access, LLM pre-training, and retrieval-augmented generation. Their knowledge is deeply connected but scattered across text, tables, and knowledge graphs. This raises a practical question: when these modalities disagree, how can we detect and explain the conflict? We study this problem as modality-level inconsistency detection. We first introduce a taxonomy of cross-modal knowledge inconsistencies, covering information granularity differences, direct conflicts, temporal changes, and KG incompleteness. We then present Kontrast, an automatic framework that uses Text-to-SPARQL and LLM reasoning to compare table-based answers with KG evidence and categorize the resulting inconsistencies. Experiments on various Table-QA datasets show that cross-modal inconsistencies are common and informative. They reveal not only true knowledge conflicts, but also missing KG structure and temporal mismatches while being limited by Text-to-SPARQL errors and noise. Our analysis shows that text, tables, and KGs can complement and correct one another through systematic comparison. Kontrast provides a practical tool for large-scale knowledge auditing and establishes a benchmark for future work on cross-modal knowledge consistency. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ECLADATTA/KONTRAST.
We present a web demo for exploring a large-scale disambiguated knowledge base (KB) materialized from a large language model (LLM). GPTKB 2.0 contains 38.4M triples over 1.6M canonical entities, together with 207.6K consolidated relations and 66K consolidated classes. Unlike prior LLM-derived knowledge bases that largely identify entities by surface strings, GPTKB 2.0 performs context-guided disambiguation during recursive KB construction, separating homonyms and merging synonymous mentions as facts are elicited. The demo makes this process inspectable: users can browse entities, follow links across the KB, and audit the provenance of individual facts, including surface forms, candidate matches, source triples, and disambiguation decisions. The interface further supports structured SPARQL queries, natural-language questions translated to SPARQL, and entity linking from user-provided text to canonical GPTKB 2.0 entries. GPTKB 2.0 is available at https://gptkb.org/, with the full KB downloadable for offline use.
Integrating heterogeneous datasets within data lakes is a critical challenge, particularly for semantically related tables that lack the explicit attributes needed to be joined. We study Discovery-Driven Integration, where the relevant sources and their missing relational structure must be discovered before integration. In this setting, unstructured text provides the evidence that connects otherwise disjoint tables. The fundamental challenge is to discover the relationships at a fine-grained level that connect individual rows from different tables through specific sentences. We formalize this task as Text-Mediated Join Path Discovery and propose a horizontal bidirectional cross-attention architecture called LOKI Latent-space Optimization for Knowledge Integration) that learns contextualized representations of table rows and sentences. Through a global table-text contrastive objective, fine-grained row-sentence associations emerge without explicit local supervision. Existing multi-modal discovery methods largely retrieve coarse-grained column-text associations, whereas integration systems assume supplied row-text links, schemas, or queries. LOKI instead transforms these implicit associations into explicit, interpretable join paths, organizes them into relation-consistent groups, and materializes them as typed integrated tables with sentence-level provenance. Comprehensive evaluations on real-world benchmarks demonstrate that LOKI consistently outperforms state-of-the-art multi-modal data discovery approaches, and materializes typed integrated tables with 0.982 macro typed-pair precision while being up to 40 times cheaper in LLM API cost than direct prompting.
Md Ataur Rahman, Dimitris Sacharidis, Oscar Romero +1
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly provided with contextual evidence in heterogeneous forms: as a text passage, as a rendered image of the same passage, or as both together. However, it remains unclear how consistently these surface forms are processed, especially when the evidence conflicts with the model's parametric knowledge. We study modality robustness under knowledge conflict across 13 MLLMs and two datasets, and find them far from robust. (1) Contrary to common belief, models favor a context that contradicts parametric knowledge more readily in image form than in text form; (2) when a contradicting text and image are presented together, the preferred modality is essentially arbitrary, varying with input order, model, and dataset. We further demonstrate that this instability has practical consequences: it degrades performance in multimodal RAG and can be exploited by adversarial attacks. To alleviate this brittleness, we examine several simple techniques---prompting, steering, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and direct preference optimization; the majority prove ineffective, whereas SFT achieves moderate success. We therefore call for greater awareness of this inconsistency and argue that it is fundamental, demanding attention at multiple training stages.