PIKS: Universal Physics-Informed Kernel Methods

In physics-informed machine learning, a target function $u^*$ is learned from noisy value observations $y_i=u^*(x_i)+ \varepsilon_i$, together with differential information, given either by noisy observations $d_j=(Du^*)(z_j)+ξ_j$ or by a known physical constraint $Du^*=v$. We consider the setting where $D$ is a linear differential operator and analyze a physics-informed kernel estimator $\hat u$ combining $n$ value observations and $m$ differential observations. In this context, we ask how much can differential information improve predictions, and how does this improvement depend quantitatively on $n$, $m$, and $D$. We prove finite-sample bounds, supported by numerical simulations, revealing a two-regime structure for the prediction error. When $m$ is limited, the rate depends jointly on $n$ and $m$; when $m$ exceeds a problem-dependent threshold, the rate saturates and matches the oracle rate obtained when the perfect constraint $D \hat u = Du^*$ is imposed. Examples are discussed for Sobolev spaces which are reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and include partial Laplacian constraints on the torus and gradient observations on bounded domains. These examples illustrate the range of possible learning rate improvements --- from the standard nonparametric $n^{-1/4}$ to the parametric rate $n^{-1/2}$. Finally, we derive physically consistent rates in a stronger norm that jointly controls the errors in $\hat u$ and $D\hat u$.

Physics-informed machine learning (PIML) integrates mechanistic knowledge, typically in the form of partial differential equations (PDE), into data-driven models. Despite strong empirical performance, its statistical generalisation properties remain poorly understood, particularly in the regression setting with unbounded losses. Existing analyses rely on approximation or stability arguments and do not fully capture how physical structure influences generalisation from finite data. In this work, we develop a PAC-Bayesian framework for PIML that provides high-probability generalisation guarantees in the presence of unbounded losses. We adopt a multi-task perspective that jointly treats data fidelity, PDE residuals, initial and boundary conditions, avoiding the looseness induced by standard union-bound approaches. Our analysis leverages the structure of physics-informed objectives to derive novel bounds where the complexity scales with input-gradient norms of the losses, revealing a direct link between physical regularity and generalisation. We instantiate this framework under Sobolev and Poincaré-type assumptions, yielding two classes of bounds that trade off statistical complexity and smoothness in different regimes. Building on these results, we propose a self-bounding-aware learning algorithm that directly optimises tractable surrogates of the derived bounds, along with a practical procedure to estimate the associated constants in realistic settings. Empirical evaluations on standard PDE benchmarks demonstrate that our bounds are non-vacuous, significantly tighter than union-bound baselines, and can be effectively minimised during training. Overall, our results provide a principled statistical foundation for the generalisation of physics-informed models.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a mesh-free framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet training often suffers from gradient pathologies, spectral bias, and poor convergence, especially for problems with strong nonlinearity, sharp gradients, or multiscale features. We propose the Curriculum-Guided Gaussian Mixture Physics-Informed Neural Network (CGMPINN), which integrates Gaussian mixture modeling with dynamic curriculum learning. Specifically, a GMM is periodically fitted to the PDE residual distribution to quantify spatially varying learning difficulty. A smooth curriculum schedule progressively shifts training focus from easy to harder regions, while precision-based variance modulation suppresses unreliable clusters during early optimization. This dual curriculum is governed by a shared curriculum parameter and can be combined with self-adaptive loss balancing. We further establish theoretical guarantees, including sublinear convergence of the gradient norm for the induced time-varying loss, uniform equivalence between the curriculum-weighted and standard PDE losses, and a generalization bound with an explicit weighting-induced bias characterization. Experiments on six benchmark PDEs spanning elliptic, parabolic, hyperbolic, advection-dominated, and nonlinear reaction-diffusion types show that CGMPINN consistently achieves the lowest relative $L_2$ and maximum absolute errors among all compared methods, reducing relative $L_2$ error by up to 97.8% over the standard PINN at comparable cost. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Mathematics-Yang/CGMPINN.