PlantBGC: Transformer for Plant BGC Discovery via Label-Free Domain Adaptation and Weak Supervision

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis is a foundational tool for translating large-scale genomic data into biological insights, but typically yields hundreds of redundant terms that obscure overarching themes. Existing summarization tools rely on fixed similarity metrics (REVIGO, GOSemSim, clusterProfiler::simplify()), gene-overlap measures (Metascape), or static hierarchy mappings (GO-slim), and therefore cannot incorporate biological context. Manual curation provides context-aware grouping but is subjective and labor-intensive. A scalable, context-aware framework is needed to cluster GO terms into interpretable higher-order biological domains. Here we present LLMBDC (Large Language Model for Biological Domains Oriented Clustering of Gene Ontology), a training-free framework that leverages zero-shot semantic reasoning of LLMs with confidence scoring to cluster GO terms into BioDomains using only ontology information at inference time. Benchmarked across Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Fragile X syndrome (FXS) against six baseline methods including SapBERT, LLMBDC achieved substantially higher precision, recall, and clustering performance. Against ground-truth annotations, LLMBDC improved ARI from 9.7% to 73.3% (AD) and from 15.7% to 66.6% (FXS) over REVIGO, with corresponding NMI gains from 59.9% to 73.4% (AD) and 66.0% to 79.5% (FXS). A Cauchy combination test further confirmed that aggregated BioDomains retained statistically significant functional signals. LLMBDC provides a scalable, reproducible, and interpretable route to context-aware, system-level interpretation of GO enrichment results while preserving biological specificity.

Transformer models for high-dimensional omics analysis process thousands of genes or pathways, although only a subset requires deep computation. Mixture-of-Recursions (MoR) improves efficiency through adaptive token-choice or expert-choice routing. We propose bioMoR, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first framework to apply MoR to gene-level and pathway-level learning. Our contributions include identifying three locations for integrating structured biological knowledge within an MoR backbone: graph-based information sharing refines token embeddings, a structural bias guides self-attention toward biologically related tokens, and a graph-aware router uses neighborhood information to determine each token's recursion depth. These techniques are centered on our insight that additional knowledge of token interaction can effectively help models construct embeddings and select which tokens should be learned more deeply. Across eight benchmarks spanning diverse omics data types and evaluated under a unified five-fold cross-validation protocol, bioMoR improves average macro-F1 by 8.2 percentage points and balanced accuracy by 7.1 percentage points over the strongest biology-agnostic MoR baseline while using 75 percent fewer parameters and up to 58 percent fewer FLOPs than a non-recursive Transformer. The selected marker genes or pathways provide biological interpretability, while their token-specific recursion depths reveal how computation is allocated.

Cell-type-specific marker genes are fundamental to plant biology, yet existing resources primarily rely on curated databases or high-throughput studies without explicitly modeling the supporting evidence found in scientific literature. We introduce PlantMarkerBench, a multi-species benchmark for evaluating literature-grounded plant marker evidence interpretation from full-text biological papers. PlantMarkerBench is constructed using a modular curation pipeline integrating large-scale literature retrieval, hybrid search, species-aware biological grounding, structured evidence extraction, and targeted human review. The benchmark spans four plant species -- Arabidopsis, maize, rice, and tomato -- and contains 5,550 sentence-level evidence instances annotated for marker-evidence validity, evidence type, and support strength. We define two benchmark tasks: determining whether a candidate sentence provides valid marker evidence for a gene-cell-type pair, and classifying the evidence into expression, localization, function, indirect, or negative categories. We benchmark diverse open-weight and closed-source language models across species and prompting strategies. Although frontier models achieve relatively strong performance on direct expression evidence, performance drops substantially on functional, indirect, and weak-support evidence, with evidence-type confusion emerging as a dominant failure mode. Open-weight models additionally exhibit elevated false-positive rates under ambiguous biological contexts. PlantMarkerBench provides a challenging and reproducible evaluation framework for literature-grounded biological evidence attribution and supports future research on trustworthy scientific information extraction and AI-assisted plant biology.