ArtECulture: Benchmarking Culture-Conditioned Visual Emotion Understanding in Multimodal Large Language Models

This paper introduces a multi-label visual emotion analysis benchmark dataset for comprehensively evaluating the ability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to predict the emotions evoked by images. Recent user studies report an unintuitive finding: humans may prefer the predictions of MLLMs over the labels in existing datasets. We argue that this phenomenon stems from the suboptimal annotation scheme used in existing datasets, where each annotator is shown a single candidate emotion for each image and judges whether it is evoked or not. This approach is clearly limited because a single image can evoke multiple emotions with varying intensities. As a result, evaluations based on these datasets may underestimate the capabilities of MLLMs, yet an appropriate benchmark for evaluating such models remains lacking. To address this issue, we introduce a new multi-label benchmark dataset for visual emotion analysis toward MLLMs evaluation. We hire $20$ annotators per image and ask them to select all emotions they feel from an image. Then, we aggregate the votes across all annotators, providing a more reliable and representative dataset labeled with a distribution of emotions. The resulting dataset contains $10,344$ images with $236,998$ valid votes across eight emotions. Based on this benchmark dataset, we evaluate several recent models, including Qwen3-VL, OpenAI's GPT, Gemini, and Claude. We assess model performance on both dominant emotion prediction and emotion distribution prediction. Our results demonstrate the progress achieved by recent MLLMs while also indicating that substantial room for improvement remains. Furthermore, our experiments with LLM-as-a-judge show that the method does not consistently improve MLLMs' performance, indicating its limitations for the subjective task of visual emotion analysis.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can produce fluent artwork emotion explanations, but they often suffer from attribute flooding: they enumerate many visible formal attributes without identifying which cues actually support the affective judgment. We therefore formulate artwork emotion understanding as Attribute-Grounded Selective Reasoning (AGSR), where predefined formal attributes serve as evidence units and only emotionally operative attributes should enter the final interpretation. To make this problem measurable, we extend EmoArt, originally introduced at ACM MM 2025 as a 132,664-artwork resource with content, formal-attribute, valence-arousal, and emotion annotations, by adding a 1,400-artwork human salience extension annotated by 15 art-trained annotators. This extension provides instance-level supervision for distinguishing attributes that are merely present from those that are emotionally salient. We further propose FAB-G (Formal-Attribute Bottleneck-Guided reasoning), a supervised multi-agent framework that first predicts attribute-level salience and then constrains downstream emotional analysis to the retained cues. Experiments show that FAB-G yields consistent gains in emotion, arousal, and valence prediction, achieves stronger agreement with human-marked salient attributes under Dice and Tversky metrics, and produces substantially more compact final explanations than prompting-based baselines. Cross-dataset evaluation further suggests that attribute-grounded salience selection transfers beyond the source distribution of EmoArt, while also revealing attribute-specific boundary cases. The dataset and project page are available at https://zhiliangzhang.github.io/EmoArt-130k/

Affective Image Content Analysis (AICA) aims to recognize and understand emotions elicited by visual content, representing an indispensable step toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, despite the rapid progress of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), systematic evaluation of their visual emotional intelligence remains largely absent from recent model releases. We attribute this gap to a structural mismatch between conventional AICA paradigms and the open-ended, instruction-driven nature of MLLMs, where further analysis reveals four major limitations: omission of plausible responses, limited emotion taxonomies, neglect of contextual factors, and labor-intensive annotation. To overcome these barriers, we introduce Emotion Statement Judgement (ESJ), a statement-verification formulation that preserves the expressiveness of the input space while constraining outputs to discriminative judgements. We further develop INSETS, a labor-efficient pipeline that instantiates ESJ at scale by constructing INSETS-462k and supporting MVEI, a rigorously refined benchmark spanning sentiment polarity, emotion interpretation, scene context, and perception subjectivity. Beyond evaluation, we build EmObserver, an emotion-oriented MLLM optimized on ESJ through an elaborate multi-stage recipe. Extensive evaluation of broad-spectrum MLLMs on MVEI reveals fine-grained insights into current artificial visual emotional intelligence, while experiments on multiple AICA benchmarks demonstrate the accuracy, generalization, and reasoning faithfulness of EmObserver. Collectively, these results establish ESJ as a practical formulation, MVEI as a comprehensive benchmark, and EmObserver as an advanced baseline for advancing MLLM-oriented visual emotional intelligence. Code will be released at: https://github.com/wdqqdw/EmObserver.