Passive acoustic monitoring is an important tool for biodiversity assessment and wildlife conservation because it supports continuous and non-invasive monitoring of species across large spatial and temporal scales. Robust monitoring remains challenging because many datasets contain sparse positive labels, where species presences may be confirmed while unannotated species cannot be assumed absent. In this work, we study transfer learning under sparse positive labels using BirdCLEF+ 2026 as a target benchmark and BirdCLEF 2021, iNatSounds, WABAD, and BirdSet as external bioacoustic sources. We introduce a multi-source reliability framework that models heterogeneous bioacoustic datasets as distinct supervision sources with differing reliability. Our approach achieves 0.584 macro average precision and 0.860 macro AUC on public BirdCLEF+ 2026 validation labels while outperforming naive source pooling strategies. The strongest gains arise from passive acoustic monitoring datasets and biologically informed source selection. Our findings suggest that transfer learning in bioacoustics is fundamentally a weak supervision and negative transfer problem.
Ecological monitoring increasingly relies on machine learning models, whose performance depends on the quality and quantity of labelled data. However, obtaining these labels is costly, particularly in passive acoustic monitoring, where vast amounts of data are collected but only a small proportion can feasibly be annotated. Active learning addresses this bottleneck by prioritizing which samples should be labelled. However, progress is difficult to measure, because published methods are evaluated under different models, budgets, evaluation metrics and datasets. To address this challenge, we present the 2026 Active Learning for Bioacoustics BioDCASE challenge: a systematic evaluation of sampling methods designed to identify effective AL strategies. Participant methods were evaluated across four subsets composed of terrestrial and marine data. Across ten proposed sampling methods from seven teams, the top-ranked method achieved an area under the learning curve 26.4 % higher than random sampling at the same annotation budget, averaged over four data subsets. Significant variation in performance was observed across subsets, with the top-performing submission achieving a 67.1 % gain for the HSN subset over random sampling and a gain of 8 % for the ATBFL subset. Top-ranking submissions combined multiple acquisition signals, and diversity-based selection outperformed pure uncertainty sampling. Furthermore, there is evidence that transitioning from diversity-based to uncertainty-based selection and explicitly reducing redundancy within acquisition batches improve model training. There is also initial evidence that larger acquisition batch sizes may be increasingly beneficial later in the labelling process.
Passive acoustic monitoring holds great promise for ecological inference, yet existing automated tools are typically narrowly trained and non-transferable. We address these limitations with PULSE, a semi-supervised, multi-task framework for Orthoptera bioacoustics, combining weakly-supervised species classification, self-supervised learning on unlabelled field audio, and knowledge distillation from a general-purpose bioacoustic model. Our domain-adapted specialist model outperforms a state-of-the-art general model across all metrics (macro F1: 0.21 vs. 0.07; AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.45; AP: 0.32 vs. 0.19), with active learning further raising F1 to 0.34 and AUC to 0.84. Beyond classification, the learned embeddings encode ecologically meaningful structure, exposed through an interactive visualisation tool for ecological discovery.
Passive acoustic monitoring can measure biodiversity at larger scales, but time--frequency annotation of animal vocalizations is expensive, site-specific, and difficult to sustain at scale. We present a label-efficient sound detection framework that combines masked audio pretraining with a lightweight detector on mel spectrograms, then further improves robustness through iterative self-training on unlabeled audio. We first pretrain a ViT-based encoder on unlabeled recordings via masked reconstruction and transfer the encoder to a detection backbone. To better separate animal sounds from confounding background, we add a box-level contrastive loss that pulls matched event regions together while pushing noisy negatives apart. We then apply a two-stage pseudo-labeling curriculum to exploit large unlabeled pools without additional annotation. We evaluate the performance on two ecologically distinct domains: tropical rainforest soundscapes (Indonesia) and bird vocalizations in Mediterranean habitats (Spain). On both domains, masked audio pretraining and contrastive learning consistently improve time--frequency detection under temporal and cross-site distribution shift, and self-training yields further gains in out-of-distribution performance. On the rainforest domain, MAST with self-training achieves +0.22 mAP and +0.24 F1 over the strongest baseline under cross-site shift. On the bird domain, self-training achieves +0.12 mAP and +0.10 F1 over the strongest baseline under cross-site shift. Overall, our results show that MAST can effectively extend self-supervised audio representations from clip-level tasks to robust box-level localization across diverse bioacoustic settings, providing a practical path for biodiversity monitoring with limited labels.
Tianyi Xu, Daniel Pimentel-Alarcón, Zuzana Buřivalová +1