Towards Robust Version Identification in the Wild: A Dataset, Benchmark, and Fine-Tuning Study

Sample identification (SI) is the task of matching an element of a musical work to its musically transformed versions used to create new works. The task has received little attention and lacks large-scale publicly available data. In this work, we mine sampling annotations from a music database and split them for training and evaluation. The resulting dataset is nearly three orders of magnitude larger than the existing SI benchmarks, with training, validation, and test sets of 114 k, 6 k, and 10 k tracks. We find that naively splitting the annotations places the same tracks in different sets. To avoid this, we construct a graph from the annotations and split it over connected components. We further find that a single mega-component contains half of the annotations, making component-wise splitting incompatible with balanced splits; we trim it, yielding a leakage-aware pipeline. We share the dataset for non-commercial scientific research purposes only and make the data-analysis and splitting code publicly available. We hope that our work fosters research on SI.

We introduce Echoes, a new dataset for music deepfake detection designed for training and benchmarking detectors under realistic and provider-diverse conditions. Echoes comprises 4,468 tracks (131 hours of audio) spanning multiple genres (pop, rock, electronic), and includes content generated by ten popular AI music generation systems. To prevent shortcut learning and promote robust generalization, the dataset is deliberately constructed to be challenging, enforcing semantic-level alignment between spoofed audio and bona fide references. This alignment is achieved by conditioning generated audio samples directly on bona-fide waveforms or song descriptors. We evaluate Echoes in a cross-dataset setting against three existing AI-generated music datasets using state-of-the-art Wav2Vec2 XLS-R 2B representations. Results show that (i) Echoes is the hardest in-domain dataset; (ii) detectors trained on existing datasets transfer poorly to Echoes; (iii) training on Echoes yields the strongest generalization performance. These findings suggest that provider diversity and semantic alignment help learn more transferable detection cues.

Music Cover Retrieval, also known as Version Identification, aims to recognize distinct renditions of the same underlying musical work, a task central to catalog management, copyright enforcement, and music retrieval. State-of-the-art approaches have largely focused on harmonic and melodic features, employing increasingly complex audio pipelines designed to be invariant to musical attributes that often vary widely across covers. While effective, these methods demand substantial training time and computational resources. By contrast, lyrics constitute a strong invariant across covers, though their use has been limited by the difficulty of extracting them accurately and efficiently from polyphonic audio. Early methods relied on simple frameworks that limited downstream performance, while more recent systems deliver stronger results but require large models integrated within complex multimodal architectures. We introduce LIVI (Lyrics-Informed Version Identification), an approach that seeks to balance retrieval accuracy with computational efficiency. First, LIVI leverages supervision from state-of-the-art transcription and text embedding models during training to achieve retrieval accuracy on par with--or superior to--harmonic-based systems. Second, LIVI remains lightweight and efficient by removing the transcription step at inference, challenging the dominance of complexity-heavy pipelines.