Failing Gracefully: Mitigating Impact of Inevitable Robot Failures

Learning from demonstration is widely used for robot navigation, yet it suffers from a fundamental limitation: demonstrations consist predominantly of successful behaviors and provide limited coverage of unsafe states. This limitation leads to poor safety when the robot encounters scenarios beyond the demonstration distribution. Failure experiences, such as collisions, contain essential information about unsafe regions, but remain underutilized. The key difficulty lies in the fact that failure data do not provide valid guidance for action imitation, and their naive incorporation into policy learning often degrades performance. We address this challenge by proposing a failure-aware learning framework that explicitly decouples the roles of success and failure data. In this framework, failure experiences are used to shape value estimation in hazardous regions, while policy learning is restricted to successful demonstrations. This separation enables the effective use of failure data without corrupting policy behavior. We implement this design within an offline reinforcement learning (RL) setting and evaluate it in both simulation and real-world environments. The results show that our framework consistently reduces collision rates while preserving the task success rate, and demonstrate strong generalization across different environments and robot platforms.

While robotic manipulation capabilities have advanced rapidly, physical safety remains a major barrier to deploying household robots: task success is insufficient if the robot damages itself or its surroundings. Simulation offers a harm-free alternative to costly and dangerous real-world training and evaluation, yet existing simulators lack general mechanisms to detect, quantify, and represent damage. To address this gap, we introduce OOPSIEVERSE, a unified simulation framework and benchmark for damage-aware household manipulation. OOPSIEVERSE provides damage as an explicit, physically-grounded, and taskagnostic signal by converting sources such as contact forces, temperature changes, and liquid interactions into corresponding mechanical, thermal or fluid damage. OOPSIEVERSE comprises two core elements: (1) DAMAGESIM, a simulator-agnostic framework for detecting and quantifying damage during navigation and manipulation, and (2) a suite of household tasks designed to evaluate common damage modes and distinguish between task completion and safe execution. We demonstrate the generality of our framework by instantiating DAMAGESIM in two simulators with different physics backends, OmniGibson (Nvidia Omniverse) and RoboCasa (MuJoCo). We further showcase the utility of OOPSIEVERSE across multiple use cases, including (1) guiding safer demonstration collection via real-time damage feedback, (2) learning safer manipulation policies through damage-conditioned imitation learning and reinforcement learning, (3) benchmarking the safety of state-of-the-art Vision Language Action policies, and (4) improving real-world safety of sim-to-real transferred policies. Together, our results highlight the potential of OOPSIEVERSE as an open-source foundation for systematic, scalable research on safe robot manipulation. For code and more information, please refer to https://robin-lab.cs.utexas.edu/oopsieverse/

Robotic manipulation is typically evaluated by task success, but successful completion does not guarantee safe execution. Many safety failures are temporal: a robot may touch a clean surface after contamination or release an object before it is fully inside an enclosure. We introduce SafeManip, a property-driven benchmark to explicitly evaluate temporal safety properties in robotic manipulation, moving beyond prior evaluations that largely focus on task completion or per-state constraint violations. SafeManip defines reusable safety templates over finite executions using Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf). It maps observed rollouts to symbolic predicate traces and evaluates them with LTLf-based monitors. Its property suite covers eight manipulation safety categories: collision and contact safety, grasp stability, release stability, cross-contamination, action onset, mechanism recovery, object containment, and enclosure access. Templates can be instantiated with task-specific objects, fixtures, regions, or skills, allowing the same safety specifications to generalize across tasks and environments. We evaluate SafeManip on six vision-language-action policies, including $π_0$, $π_{0.5}$, GR00T, and their training variants, across 50 RoboCasa365 household tasks. Results show that even strong models often behave unsafely. Task-success gains do not reliably translate into safer execution: many successful rollouts remain unsafe, while longer-horizon or more complex tasks expose more violations. SafeManip provides a reusable evaluation layer for diagnosing temporal safety failures and measuring safe success beyond task completion.