Vision Language Models (VLMs) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents have revolutionized how engineers approach complex problems in real-world applications. Their adoption in video games is on the other hand limited by the extreme variability of the synthetic scenarios and their poor compliance with real-world physics. Here we investigate the use of VLMs for annotating video game frame sequences with reward signals, a task with several potential applications including, among others, conditioned training and offline reinforcement learning. We show that VLMs often struggle to answer basic questions on racing video games (although we observed a similar behavior on other game genres) and discuss countermeasures such as VLM output mixing and prompt optimization. We also show how input sequence length, resolution, and question batching affect the annotation quality and its token consumption.
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a powerful but far from easy-to-use technique for policy learning. In the specific case of video games, access to the game engine is required to get rewards for training (e.g. to collect rewards from the environment). Furthermore, the proper identification and weighting of the rewards generally requires a difficult trial-and-error approach. Lastly, rewards are often sparse and understanding how they eventually affect the learned policy is a non-trivial exercise. To ease these issues we propose annotating a video game dataset with Vision Language Models (VLMs) instructed to extract human defined rewards. We show that offline RL can then be used to train a conditioned agent that responds accordingly to the desired returns and we discuss the difficulties and limitations that emerged in our early experiments.
Vision-language model (VLM) agents are increasingly deployed in interactive game environments. Yet game benchmarks for VLM agents typically report a single first-attempt score per (agent, game) pair, focus on single-agent Solo play, and lack unified protocols for evaluating heterogeneous agent classes (commercial VLMs, open-weight VLMs, and specialized game policies) on the same footing. We address these gaps with OmniGameArena, a real-time benchmark of twelve newly built Unreal Engine 5 games spanning Solo (7), PvP (3), and Coop (2) with unified action interfaces, and the Improvement Dynamics Curve (IDC), an agentic-reflection harness in which a tool-using reflector LLM autonomously refines a bounded skill prompt across multiple rounds. Beyond cold-start leaderboard scores, IDC exposes two additional observables for each (agent, game) pair: how the score evolves across reflection rounds, and how the learned skill behaves on held-out task variants. We report these observables for twelve VLM agents on the cold-start leaderboard and four top agents under IDC.
In this work, we study the use of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for anomaly detection in an agent-driven game Quality Assurance (QA) pipeline focusing on geometry clipping. In this evaluation, a custom exploration agent navigates a game level to collect visual observations, while the automatic annotation pipeline provides frame-level clipping labels. This setup allows us to evaluate recent VLMs on a controlled anomaly detection task without manual annotation. We benchmark six recent VLMs (Gemini, GPT, Qwen, Gemma, Llama, and Ministral) under a zero-shot prompting setting and analyse their sensitivity to four prompt variants. Our results show that while the VLMs can capture visual cues associated with geometry clipping, they all produce substantial false positives on visually ambiguous frames such as near-contact geometry and partial occlusions. Gemini-3.1-Flash achieves the best overall accuracy and is the most robust to prompt variation, while open-source models exhibit large precision--recall swings depending on the prompt design. These findings suggest that current VLMs are best suited as high-recall candidate filters within multi-stage QA pipelines rather than as standalone bug detectors.
Carlos Celemin, Benedict Wilkins, Adrián Barahona-Ríos +2