LIBAD: A Multimodal Anomaly Detection Benchmark for Li-Ion Battery Electrode Manufacturing

Reliable early detection of lithium-ion battery degradation requires health indicators that are physically interpretable and computable from routine cycler telemetry without access to the degradation region. We introduce \textsc{CausalHealth}, a framework that applies causal graph discovery and $k$-nearest-neighbour transfer entropy to per-cycle voltage, current, temperature, and resistance time series, and organises twelve resulting anomaly scores into three signal-class bundles (Magnitude-shift, Predictive-residual, Complexity-entropy) -- with Isolation Forest reported separately as it falls below the bundle reliability threshold -- to characterise detection sensitivity across ten commissioning fractions (5--30,%). The Magnitude-shift class achieves 100,% detection across all seven tested cells spanning LFP (MIT--Stanford MATR) and LCO (NASA PCoE, CALCE CS2) chemistries, with a lead time of up to 402 cycles before conventional capacity-threshold failure on gradual-fade cells. A Reliability-Weighted Master Health Index (RWMHI) -- a cross-bundle fusion of five high-reliability detectors weighted by inverse coefficient of variation -- improves lead time by 15--52 cycles over the class median on long-lived cells while maintaining 100,% detection. Validation against electrochemical impedance spectroscopy on an NMC prismatic cell provides independent physical grounding: transfer entropy $\mathrm{TE}(R \!\to\! V)$ correlates with charge-transfer resistance $R_{\mathrm{ct}}$ (pooled $r = +0.990$; temperature-controlled partial $r = +0.898$), and an Arrhenius analysis of both quantities yields an activation energy consistent with published NMC charge-transfer kinetics. These results are evaluated on seven cells across three benchmark datasets.

In modern high-throughput industrial production lines, product configurations and visual characteristics frequently change, making it impractical to collect and annotate data for every new scenario. This dynamic setting makes Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection (ZSAD) particularly suitable, as it enables defect detection without requiring training on target-specific samples. Although recent ZSAD approaches show promising results, they are computationally intensive and thus unsuitable for deployment on resource-constrained devices. We propose LiZAD: a lightweight framework designed for real-time ZSAD specifically tailored for use on edge devices. The proposed approach pairs the dense and spatially aware visual features of DINOv3, crucial for precise pixel-level localization, with the highly computationally efficient text embeddings of MobileCLIP2. These features are then mapped into a shared latent space via low-memory trainable projection heads. Compared to six state-of-the-art ZSAD models, LiZAD achieves an average memory reduction of 61.5%, a parameter reduction of 74.6%, and a speedup of 3.02x in terms of latency. Despite substantial reductions in computational and memory costs, our approach maintains competitive anomaly detection performance, dropping the average P-AUROC by just 6.4% relative to the best state-of-the-art model across the VisA, BTAD, MPDD, and MVTec-AD datasets. Finally, it is successfully deployed on the NVIDIA Jetson NX and Jetson AGX edge devices and tested on the real production line of the Industrial Computer Engineering Laboratory (ICE Lab) at the University of Verona. The code is available at https://github.com/intelligolabs/LiZAD.

Multimodal large language models have demonstrated strong defect recognition capability in industrial anomaly detection. However, in lithography review, merely determining whether an image contains a defect is insufficient for engineering inspection; models must also understand defect morphology, spatial location, and the potential causes supported by visible evidence. To this end, this paper proposes LDU-Bench, a multi-task multimodal benchmark for lithography defect understanding. Constructed from real lithography and integrated-circuit review images, LDU-Bench decomposes the review workflow into four independent tasks: defect triage, morphology recognition, coarse localization, and image-conditioned cause analysis. It systematically evaluates models using task-level metrics, diagnostic readouts, and the Lithography Closure Score (LCS). Experimental results show that although existing MLLMs can perform defect triage relatively reliably, this ability does not stably transfer to downstream review stages. Morphology alignment, effective localization, and evidence-to-cause mapping remain the major bottlenecks. Further diagnostics indicate that this capability break is not a fluctuation of a single metric, but reflects insufficient structured understanding across semantic levels. Overall, LDU-Bench provides a quantifiable and diagnostic unified platform for evaluating the usability, failure points, and capability boundaries of industrial MLLMs in lithography review chains.