cs.CLAug 9, 2026

Investigating Multimodal Informativity under Different Partner Visibility Conditions in Video-Mediated Dialogue

Authors: Esam GhalebHugh Mee WongKristina Kobrock

Organizations: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics · Utrecht University · Osnabrück University

Abstract

Situated language use is multimodal and embodied. For example, gestures can carry information that is absent or underspecified in the speech signal, yet dialogue models typically rely on transcripts alone. We study how much referential information gestures and their combination with speech carry in multimodal dialogue under different partner visibility conditions. % We build models that identify the intended referent in a video-mediated referential communication game based on either the speech transcript, the skeletal representation of gesture, or both modalities. Our results show that gesture alone is predictive of the intended referent and that multimodal fusion is most beneficial when the transcript-based model is uncertain. Training-only alignment of learned representations with the referent image further improves the fusion model performance. % In a comparison with human interaction data, we further see pragmatic effects of interlocutor visibility on gesture production and informativeness as well as an entrainment effect in speech and multimodal, but not gesture, performance across rounds of repeated interaction. We thus make contributions to the technical modelling of multimodal information in human dialogue and the analysis of human interaction data via trained model representations.

Explore similar work

Sep 14, 2026cs.CL

Negation Beyond the Verbal Channel: Temporal Multimodal Correlates in Dialogue

Negation is typically modeled through its linguistic realization, although spoken interaction is accompanied by tightly coordinated nonverbal behavior. We ask whether contexts centered on spoken negation cues contain measurable multimodal behavioral information: whether they can be distinguished from matched control contexts without lexical or acoustic input, where this information occurs in time, which modalities carry it, and whether it extends to the dialogue partner. We study 27 human-human interviews conducted in virtual reality, comprising temporally aligned gaze, facial, head, body, hand, and finger behavior and 964 annotated negation cues. Treating classification as a predictive probe, we compare 20 time-series models while excluding lexical and acoustic information, and then systematically vary temporal context, interactional source, modality availability, and event timing. Across grouped 10-fold cross-validation, the strongest probes reach up to .75 mean held-out AUROC from speaker-side behavior. Temporal analyses show that predictive information is concentrated around cue onset but remains detectable over a broader surrounding interval, while dialogue-partner behavior carries weaker predictive information with a comparatively diffuse temporal profile. Ablation and timing perturbations further show that facial features produce the largest modality-ablation effect and that the trained probe is sensitive to the temporal organization of the observed events.
Leon Hammerla, Patrick Schrottenbacher, Alexander Mehler
May 29, 2026cs.CV

Recognizing Co-Speech Gestures in-the-Wild

While humans naturally gesture during speech, only a sparse subset of these movements are visually depictive and semantically linked to specific spoken words. Current multimodal models struggle to capture these semantic co-speech gestures, heavily bottlenecked by a lack of precisely annotated training data. To address this, we introduce the Gesture Recognition in the Wild (GRW) dataset, the first large-scale benchmark designed to map unconstrained human gestures to specific words with frame-accurate temporal boundaries. Comprising 156,688 manually annotated video clips, GRW spans a highly diverse 150-word taxonomy of physical actions, spatial descriptors, and abstract concepts. We leverage GRW to train video models to (a) classify gestures as semantic or not, (b) recognize the word corresponding to a co-speech gesture, and (c) temporally localize the gesture. We also use GRW to establish benchmarks for these three tasks.
Sindhu B Hegde, K R Prajwal, Andrew Zisserman
Apr 24, 2026cs.CV

Inter-Stance: A Dyadic Multimodal Corpus for Conversational Stance Analysis

Social interactions dominate our perceptions of the world and shape our daily behavior by attaching social meaning to acts as simple and spontaneous as gestures, facial expressions, voice, and speech. People mimic and otherwise respond to each other's postures, facial expressions, mannerisms, and other verbal and nonverbal behavior, and form appraisals or evaluations in the process. Yet, no publicly-available dataset includes multimodal recordings and self-report measures of multiple persons in social interaction. Dyadic recordings and annotation are lacking. We present a new data corpus of multimodal dyadic interaction (45 dyads, 90 persons) that includes synchronized multi-modality behavior (2D face video, 3D face geometry, thermal spectrum dynamics, voice and speech behavior, physiology (PPG, EDA, heart-rate, blood pressure, and respiration), and self-reported affect of all participants in a communicative interaction scenario. Two types of dyads are included: persons with shared past history and strangers. Annotations include social signals, agreement, disagreement, and neutral stance. With a potent emotion induction, these multimodal data will enable novel modeling of multimodal interpersonal behavior. We present extensive experiments to evaluate multimodal dyadic communication of dyads with and without interpersonal history, and their affect. This new database will make multimodal modeling of social interaction never possible before. The dataset includes 20TB of multimodal data to share with the research community.
Xiang Zhang, Xiaotian Li, Taoyue Wang +9