cs.CVAug 10, 2026

Bright-Channel Retinex Enhancement with a Conditional Overdispered-Noise Analysis

Authors: Jongpil Jeong

Abstract

I present a training-free low-light enhancement method that combines local bright-channel illumination estimation, Retinex division, and edge-preserving denoising. For a fixed illumination estimate, a conditional Negative -Binominal psueduo-count method characterises the heteroscedastic noise amplified by division. The unconstrained reflectance ratio is the pixelwise maximum-likelihood estimate, with a boundary solution for zero-valued observations; the implemented estimate additionally applies illumination filtering and range clipping. The NB model is a diagnostic noise analysis rather than a calibrated sensor model, and the final fixed-bandwidth bilateral filter is an empirical approximation rather than the exact Bayesian solution. On the LOL-v1 dataset, the methodobtains mean PSNR/SSIM of 17.74dB/0.739, the highest values among the evaluated with conventional methods. A 400X600 image is processed at approximately 43 FPS on an Apple M2 Pro CPU.

Explore similar work

Jul 17, 2026cs.CV

WREN: Low Light Image Enhancement Using Retinex theory-based Double U-Net-like Structures

This paper proposes a neural network for low light image enhancement (LLIE) based on retinex theory to make LLIE robust for various dynamic range scenes. The retinex theory is an image formulation model inspired by a human color perception hypothesis, where a low light image is decomposed into intrinsic color context (i.e., reflectance map) and scene-dependent illumination (i.e., illumination map). Due to non-uniqueness of its decomposition, existing retinex-based LLIE methods often fail to achieve stable decomposition, which lead to over-enhancement. Typically, they are sensitive to the dynamic ranges that vary in different lighting conditions. To tackle this issue, we propose WREN: An LLIE neural network with double U-Net-like structures. WREN consists of two U-Net-like sub-networks. The first network has one encoder and two decoders that decompose an input image into the reflectance and illumination maps. The second network with a customized Transformer block between an encoder and a decoder only enhances the illumination map obtained from the first network: This completely follows the assumption of the retinex theory. Finally, the enhanced illumination map is recombined with the reflectance map. The network is trained end-to-end with a scale-invariant loss function, which gives robustness against the illumination scaling. Numerical results show that our method achieves the state-of-the-art performance across multiple datasets. Our code is available online.
Reina Kaneko, Junya Hara, Hiroshi Higashi +1
May 5, 2026cs.CV

BFORE: Butterfly-Firefly Optimized Retinex Enhancement for Low-Light Image Quality Improvement

Low-light images suffer from poor visibility, noise, and color distortion. Existing Retinex-based enhancement methods rely on manually tuned parameters that do not generalize across different lighting conditions. This paper proposes BFORE (Butterfly-Firefly Optimized Retinex Enhancement), a framework that automatically finds the best enhancement parameters for each image. BFORE works in two phases: (1) a Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA) searches for optimal Multi-Scale Retinex with Color Restoration (MSRCR) parameters, then (2) a Firefly Algorithm (FA) fine-tunes gamma correction, denoising, and color parameters. Both phases maximize a Gaussian Naturalness Score (GNS), a no-reference metric that measures how natural the enhanced image looks. Standard quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM, NIQE) are computed only after optimization, ensuring zero data leakage. On 30 synthetic image pairs, BFORE achieves GNS = 0.971, outperforming the next-best method MSRCR (0.894) by 8.6%. On 115 real images from the LOL dataset, BFORE achieves GNS = 0.887, outperforming MSRCR (0.808) by 9.8%. A controlled comparison with three deep learning baselines (Zero-DCE, SCI, IAT) trained under identical conditions shows BFORE surpasses the best DL method by 14.7% in GNS. An ablation study confirms that the hybrid BOA+FA strategy significantly outperforms each optimizer in isolation, and a scalability analysis at three evaluation budgets shows that the structured optimizer significantly outperforms uniform random sampling once compute is available (p = 0.009 at 128 evaluations, p = 0.021 at 300 evaluations). All improvements are statistically significant (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Processing time is 3-6 minutes per image on CPU, suitable for offline applications.
Ahmed Cherif
Jul 30, 2026cs.CV

BlindPSNR: A No-Reference Fidelity Predictor for Low-Light Image Enhancement

Low-light image enhancement (LLIE) methods involve tunable parameters that are typically fixed, often leading to performance degradation when applied across scenes. Manually selecting the best configuration, however, can be time-consuming and not always practical. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) is the natural fidelity criterion for automating parameter selection, yet it requires a ground-truth reference that is typically unavailable. To our knowledge, no learning-based method addresses no-reference PSNR prediction for low-light image enhancement; the natural surrogate, no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA), targets perceptual quality rather than signal fidelity, and all seven baselines we test achieve 0% top-1 selection accuracy on our benchmark. With paired training data, the ground-truth PSNR is analytically computable, providing exact supervision without a separate teacher network. Building on this, we propose BlindPSNR, a lightweight no-reference network that fuses the enhanced image with the degraded low-light input via windowed cross-attention and estimates PSNR through heteroscedastic regression. While a scalar-regression baseline achieves top-1 accuracy of 54.4%, BlindPSNR raises this to 89.5% with regret dropping from 1.62 dB to 0.026 dB, and generalizes to unseen datasets (SRCC = 0.61-0.67).
Mingzhe Lyu, Jinqiang Cui, Hong Zhang