Iterative Erasure Count Is Not an Affine-Invariant Concept Dimension

Tingan Jin; Shuhang Dong; Haosong Li; Chung-Hsien Chou

stat.MLAug 11, 2026

Iterative Erasure Count Is Not an Affine-Invariant Concept Dimension

Authors: Tingan Jin, Shuhang Dong, Haosong Li, Chung-Hsien Chou

Abstract

How many directions does a neural representation use to encode a concept? A common answer repeatedly erases probe directions and reports the stopping count or cumulative removed rank. We show that both quantities can change under an information-preserving invertible reparameterization, so neither is intrinsically a concept dimension. We distinguish model-defined population quantities (generating dimension, sufficient linear dimension, and minimum guarding rank) from procedure-defined quantities such as stopping count and cumulative edit rank. In a population Gaussian construction, an invertible shear preserves the prediction problem and all three quantities, yet changes the cumulative Euclidean erasure count from one to two. The separation holds for Moore--Penrose ordinary least squares and every finite nonnegative ridge weight. For a two-output full-QR procedure matching our motivating video analysis, cumulative edit rank similarly changes from two to the ambient dimension four. Conversely, the complete cumulative metric-QR trajectory is affine-equivariant when its positive-definite metric, probe, regularizer, and tie-breaking are transported consistently; exact covariance is one corollary, not a canonical semantic metric. In a known-rank finite-sample Adam/QR calibration, identity mixing stops after one accepted update in all 20 large-sample runs, whereas each tested shear $a\in\{.5,.75,1,1.25,2\}$ accepts at least two updates in all 20 runs. Controlled reparameterizations of frozen V-JEPA2 features preserve rank-zero predictions yet alter later Euclidean trajectories under practical optimization. These visual contact experiments are stress tests, not estimates of contact dimension. Iterative erasure therefore returns a procedure-relative estimand jointly determined by representation geometry and the full measurement procedure, not a semantic dimension by itself.

Explore similar work

Jul 4, 2026cs.LG

MANCE: Manifold Aware Concept Erasure

Concept erasure aims to remove a target concept from a representation while preserving the other information encoded in it. This is difficult because representations encode many concepts that are often correlated with the erasure target, so removing the target risks damaging them. We propose the Manifold Constraint Hypothesis (MCH): if natural representations concentrate on a structured, lower-dimensional manifold, then interventions should be constrained to that manifold and better preserve other information encoded in the representation during interventions. We instantiate MCH in a new concept erasure method: MANifold aware Concept Erasure (MANCE). MANCE performs iterative updates to the representations using signals from a classifier that predicts a target concept. We estimate the manifold using representations obtained from natural inputs, and then we project the concept removal update to the estimated manifold. We perform extensive evaluation on 119 settings spanning text and vision, including 13 language models, three NLP concepts, and 40 CelebA-CLIP attributes. Employing MANCE on top of previous methods shows consistent improved leakage results. We also introduce MANCE+ and MANCE++, which prepend a closed-form erasure algorithm before employing MANCE, achieving better leakage--surgicality tradeoffs relative to matched full-space updates. MANCE++, our best method, achieves state-of-the-art results on nonlinear concept erasure. These results support MCH in the erasure setting: interventions should be constrained to the natural representation manifold.

Matan Avitan, Yoav Goldberg, Yanai Elazar

Concept Erasure Manifolds

Ask PDF

Sep 23, 2026cs.LG

Hidden not Deleted: How Networks Suppress Entangled Features

Concept erasure methods that operate via linear projection assume that features occupy separable subspaces. We show this assumption fails under dense superposition: when two features are forced into an antipodal pair sharing a single subspace, state-of-the-art linear erasure destroys both, not just the target. Networks trained with gradient descent instead solve this problem non-linearly, but not uniformly: they converge to one of two distinct circuit-level solutions depending on initialization, which we call mirror and shadow solutions. We map this bifurcation as a function of feature entanglement, show it reflects a stable attractor structure rather than an artifact of our setup, and use targeted causal interventions to demonstrate that both solutions leave a substantial, measurable trace of the erased feature's representation intact, recoverable through a single scalar patch rather than requiring any further training. This mirrors a failure mode recently observed empirically in LLM unlearning, where suppression rather than deletion allows forgotten knowledge to resurface; our results offer a mechanistic, causally-validated account of why that failure mode occurs.

Akash Samanta, Manish Pratap Singh, Debasis Chaudhuri

Concept Erasure Feature Learning Entanglement Neural Collapse

Ask PDF

Jul 21, 2026cs.CV

ERank in Latent Space as an Image-Complexity and Richness Measure

We propose the effective rank (ERank) of the channel covariance of an image's deep feature map as a per-sample, label-free measure of visual richness, computed from a single forward pass through a frozen pretrained encoder. ERank counts how many decorrelated channel directions an image activates, and we characterize its properties, including its behavior under noise. Empirically, ERank orders images from plain to visually rich, correlates with codec bitrate, sharpness, and edge density, and correlates with human complexity annotations on IC9600 with

r = 0.72

. As a data-selection criterion, removing low-ERank samples improves super-resolution and removing high-ERank samples improves OCR, in both pretraining and finetuning, while selection does not help classification, segmentation, or denoising. ERank is thus a cheap richness signal, useful exactly when task difficulty is governed by input richness.

Maksim Smirnov, Grigory Kononov, Anastasiia Linich +2

Ranking Optical Character Recognition Latent Space Covariance Estimation

Ask PDF