Cloud-hosted vision-language models (VLMs) offer greater contextual reasoning capabilities than smaller onboard models, but frequent visual uploads increase communication overhead and add network and inference latency to tactical decisions. We present a risk-adaptive edge-cloud architecture in which onboard traffic assessment determines when cloud reasoning is requested. An onboard VLM and a lightweight detector capture temporal traffic conditions and path-relative hazards for conservative local response and selective cloud access. The cloud model provides tactical advice, while validation, vehicle control, and automatic emergency braking remain local. In CARLA experiments, our method matched the task success rate of periodic cloud access while reducing cloud requests by 54.1% and recording fewer automatic emergency braking (AEB) activations. In a delayed-roadwork ablation, semantic events triggered requests before the next scheduled audit. Across three emulated network profiles, the method continued to reduce cloud traffic, although lane changes took longer than with periodic access. Onboard traffic assessment therefore served as a practical trigger for selective VLM inference in these experiments.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Asymmetric edge–cloud architecture. Onboard Qwen3-VL and YOLO11n produce temporal, path-grounded evidence for local policy and cloud scheduling. The cloud returns tactical advice, while validation, actuation, and emergency braking remain local.
Fig. 2: Temporal organization of onboard semantic inference and selective cloud reasoning. The onboard path updates structured traffic evidence and the local semantic policy. A cloud request is issued when the scheduler detects an increase in urgency, permits another request for a persistent hazard, or reaches the audit interval. Returned tactical advice is validated and executed locally. The displayed time spacing is schematic.
Policy
Edge semantics
Request schedule
Edge-only
Qwen3-VL, YOLO, local mapping
None
Periodic-cloud
None
Startup and ∼ 3 s periodic
Audit-only
Same as Risk-adaptive
Startup and 10 s audit
Risk-adaptive
Qwen3-VL, YOLO, local mapping
Startup, 10 s audit, semantic events
TABLE I: Compared access policies; Audit-only is used only in RQ2.
Policy
Task ↑
Strict ↑
AEB ↓
Crash ↓
Edge-only
30/40 (75.0%)
24/40 (60.0%)
11/40
0/40
Periodic-cloud
40/40 (100%)
29/40 (72.5%)
11/40
0/40
Risk-adaptive
40/40 (100%)
35/40 (87.5%)
5/40
0/40
TABLE II: RQ1 outcomes over 40 runs per policy. Strict success excludes recorded AEB activation.
Policy
Calls ↓
Payload (MB) ↓
Tokens ↓
Periodic-cloud
399
52.011
549,011
Risk-adaptive
183
25.043
267,786
Reduction
54.1%
51.9%
51.2%
TABLE III: RQ1 aggregate cloud communication.
Policy
Task ↑
Strict ↑
AEB ↓
Calls ↓
Payload (MB) ↓
Periodic-cloud
3/5
3/5
2
50
6.652
Audit-only
4/5
3/5
1
15
2.018
Risk-adaptive
5/5
4/5
1
22
2.903
TABLE IV: RQ2 delayed-roadwork ablation (five runs per policy).
Fig. 3: RQ1–RQ2 evidence. (a) Task and strict success with Wilson 95% confidence intervals. (b) Cloud demand normalized to Periodic-cloud; Edge-only is omitted because it makes no cloud requests. (c) Matched reveal-to-lane-change times in RQ2; the cross denotes a task not completed within the horizon.
Fig. 4: Qualitative reconstruction of a Risk-adaptive roadwork maneuver: (a) local semantic hold, (b) accepted lane-change advice, (c) local maneuver execution, and (d) passage of the closure. Images are reconstructed from a logged control trace rather than original experiment footage.
Profile
Policy
Task ↑
Strict ↑
AEB ↓
Normal
Periodic
18/20 [70–97]
17/20 [64–95]
3
Risk-adaptive
17/20 [64–95]
16/20 [58–92]
1
Moderate
Periodic
16/20 [58–92]
12/20 [39–78]
8
Risk-adaptive
17/20 [64–95]
12/20 [39–78]
6
Severe
Periodic
13/20 [43–82]
3/20 [5–36]
17
Risk-adaptive
13/20 [43–82]
10/20 [30–70]
5
TABLE V: RQ3 delayed-roadwork results. Success is count/20 [Wilson 95% CI]; lane time is the mean among completed maneuvers.
Existing adaptive reasoning methods for driving Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models primarily focus on whether to reason, overlooking how reasoning should differ across driving situations. Our key insight is that while scene complexity informs reasoning depth, dynamic risk is equally critical for deciding how to reason in time-critical situations. We therefore propose CAR-VLA, a unified driving VLA model that jointly considers scene complexity and dynamic risk to guide reasoning depth, urgency, and focus. CAR-VLA maps four complexity--risk categories to three reasoning modes: Fast Intuition for direct trajectory generation in simple low-risk scenes, Slow Thinking for deliberate reasoning in complex low-risk scenes, and Reflex Response for compact, hazard-focused reasoning in high-risk scenes regardless of complexity. Rather than merely shortening deliberation, Reflex Response centers reasoning on the most critical hazard and the immediate safe response. We train CAR-VLA through progressive supervised learning that links scene assessment, reasoning-mode selection, and trajectory generation, followed by reasoning-augmented reinforcement learning to improve driving quality and reasoning behavior. Experiments on NAVSIM v1(91.1 PDMS), NAVSIM v2(90.3 EPDMS), and Navhard(35.0 EPDMS) demonstrate competitive driving performance. Qualitative comparisons on navtest and in-house high-risk scenarios further illustrate risk-aware reasoning and hazard-responsive trajectory generation. The code for this paper will be released publicly at: https://github.com/chenxl124578/CAR-VLA.git
Xiaolei Chen, Zhuolin He, Yuxuan Liang +13
Fudan University · Yinwang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd · Fuzhou University +2
Edge deployment of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) faces a tradeoff between latency and accuracy: cloud execution provides high-quality predictions but incurs communication delay and energy cost, while edge-only execution is faster but less accurate due to limited model capacity. This trade-off is further complicated by heterogeneity in image quality and reasoning complexity, making static placement suboptimal. We present INAR-VL, a lightweight edge-cloud routing system for multimodal inference in a two-tier deployment. INAR-VL maintains complementary VLMs across edge and cloud and uses lightweight image and text complexity signals to guide routing and model selection, executing simple queries locally while offloading complex ones when beneficial. Evaluation on visual question answering shows that INAR-VL executes 36% of requests on the edge, reduces latency by 24%, lowers energy by 26%, and preserves 97% of cloud-level accuracy.
Deploying vision-language models (VLMs) for safety-critical spatial reasoning on resource-constrained autonomous driving platforms requires both compact model size and reliable metric grounding. We present MoRAL (Multimodal Reasoning for Autonomous Language Models), a two-stage fine-tuning pipeline that teaches Cosmos-Reason2-2B to first read a physics-encoded Bird's Eye View (BEV) representation and then reason over it for driving decisions. The BEV image encodes LiDAR metric distance as color bands, object class as cluster morphology, and radar Doppler velocity as directional wedge overlays, externalizing spatial perception into the input image so that no learned 3D backbone is required at inference. Stage 1 fine-tunes the vision encoder on 60,000 grounding records; zero-shot baselines produce no parseable BEV outputs, confirming the vocabulary requires explicit training. Stage 2 fine-tunes the full model (52M parameters, 2.4% of total) on 57,696 chain-of-thought records generated by Cosmos-Reason2-8B as teacher, spanning eight driving question types. On 2,304 held-out nuScenes frames evaluated by Gemma 4 (31B) calibrated against human review, MoRAL wins seven of eight question types over a zero-shot 8B baseline despite using four times fewer parameters, with the largest margins on question types requiring structured multi-step physics reasoning. Emergency braking recall improves from 10.8% to 47.8%, output degeneration falls from 94.1% to 20.8%, and the full pipeline fits a consumer 8 GB GPU at 42 tok/s without quantization. These results establish a reproducible foundation for compact, physics-grounded VLM reasoning on mobile edge platforms.
Ambarish Govindarajulu Kaliamurthi, Kaikai Liu
San Jose State University · Computer Engineering Department · San José State University (SJSU) +1