Multi-Channel Feature Fusion and Monte Carlo Dropout for Uncertainty-Aware Diabetic Retinopathy Grading

Clinical screening for diabetic retinopathy proceeds in stages, yet most automated systems grade fundus images with a single black-box network. Three gaps remain: (i) lesions differ widely in size and contrast, but segmenters typically apply the same blocks to all; (ii) ungradable images are usually excluded or treated as an extra class, and lesion-aware graders seldom test whether lesions drive the grade; (iii) staged systems often report each stage only on the images reaching it, leaving propagated errors unmeasured. HierarchiRetina, a screening, segmentation and grading cascade with inspectable stage outputs, addresses each gap. First, HSMoE-AUNet is a U-Net whose skip, bottleneck and decoder blocks are sparse mixtures of heterogeneous experts, with lesion-matched types, counts and losses; SwinHRUNetPP, a dual-encoder vessel segmenter, uses a field-of-view-restricted loss. Second, LG-DRG separates gradability from ordinal severity and lets lesion masks query the image through gated cross-attention. Third, an end-to-end evaluation counts screening misses as errors and traces each error to its stage. Pooled Dice ranged from 0.184 (microaneurysms) to 0.579 (exudates); vessel Dice was 0.731. On 58,689 held-out images from six datasets, end-to-end quadratic weighted kappa was 0.804, with referral sensitivity 0.832 at specificity 0.947, and the screening gate caused 66% of errors. In ablations, the grade ignored the masks, even with the cross-attention gate started open. On all 4,105 official DDR test images, six-class accuracy was 85.6%, above the best published six-class result we found (83.8%). Staged screening systems should be evaluated end-to-end, with stage attribution and mask ablation, before clinical deployment.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of preventable blindness, and automated fundus image grading can play an important role in large-scale screening. In this work, we investigate three CLIP-based approaches for five-class DR severity grading: (1) a zero-shot baseline using prompt engineering, (2) a hybrid FCN-CLIP model augmented with CBAM attention, and (3) a ranking-aware prompting model that encodes the ordinal structure of DR progression. We train and evaluate on a combined dataset of APTOS 2019 and Messidor-2 (n=5,406), addressing class imbalance through resampling and class-specific optimal thresholding. Our experiments show that the ranking-aware model achieves the highest overall accuracy (93.42%, AUROC 0.9845) and strong recall on clinically critical severe cases, while the hybrid FCN-CLIP model (92.49%, AUROC 0.99) excels at detecting proliferative DR. Both substantially outperform the zero-shot baseline (55.17%, AUROC 0.75). We analyze the complementary strengths of each approach and discuss their practical implications for screening contexts.

The quality of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening relies on the ability to correctly grade severity; however, many deep-learning (DL) classifiers cannot be easily interpreted in the clinical context. This study presents a methodology that combines strong discriminative models with multimodal explanations, converting retinal pixels into clinically interpretable outputs. Using the APTOS 2019 benchmark, we evaluated six representative CNN- and transformer-based backbones under a controlled protocol with stratified five-fold cross-validation. We then compared ensembling strategies (hard voting, weighted soft voting, stacking) and investigated a hybrid class-level fusion variant to exploit grade-specific advantages. For interpretability, we produced Grad-CAM++ visual attribution maps and short textual rationales using vision-language models (VLMs) conditioned on the fundus image and classifier outputs under conservative prompting constraints. Modern CNN backbones (ResNet-50 and ConvNeXt-Tiny) provided the strongest single-model baselines, with cross-validated QWK up to 0.919 and 0.914, respectively. Ensembling improved ordinal agreement, and weighted soft voting was the most consistent across folds (QWK 0.934 +/- 0.017). Hybrid class-level fusion was competitive but did not yield a statistically reliable improvement over standard fusion in paired fold comparisons (Holm-adjusted p >= 1.000). For explanation quality, Grad-CAM++ offered plausible but coarse localization, and VLM rationales were generally grade-consistent. Quantitatively, VLM variants showed a trade-off between clinical completeness and template-level semantic similarity (coverage 0.700 vs. BERTScore 0.072), while image-text alignment was comparable (CLIPScore approximately 0.34).