Organizations: Department of Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan · AI Center, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Japan
Reconfigurable robots offer significant potential for adapting to diverse tasks; however, conventional centralized architectures often require dedicated actuators for each module, leading to substantial increases in overall system weight, volume, and cost. To address these challenges, this paper presents the "Detachable Wire Drive," a reconfigurable robotic system that enables the sharing of heavy and expensive actuators across various morphologies. The core of this system is the "Wire Detach Unit," a mechanism designed to physically split and reconnect wire drive paths, allowing motors to be consolidated into a common base unit. We demonstrate the versatility of this approach by developing a 2-DOF rigid arm, a continuum arm, and two distinct grippers, all of which are interchangeably attached to, and driven by, a single shared actuator set. Experimental results validate the mechanical reliability of the detachment process and the control framework's ability to seamlessly manage transitions between configurations, highlighting a path toward more efficient and multi-functional robotic systems.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: The two types of arms and grippers developed in this study, and the Wire Path Splitting Mechanism (center of the figure) that connects and disconnects them. The two arms are shown attached to the common upper motor-unit.
Fig. 2: Conceptual diagrams of conventional centralized reconfigurable robots and the proposed reconfigurable wire-driven robot system using a wire path splitting mechanism. Conventional systems require actuators for each module, making it difficult to achieve both morphological versatility and cost/weight savings. In contrast, the proposed system consolidates actuators in a common base unit and transmits power from there, enabling actuator sharing across a wide range of morphologies and achieving both goals. Additionally, using the transmission medium for joint state estimation avoids complex sensor connection reconfigurations during morphological changes.
Fig. 3: An overview of the reconfigurable wire-driven robot system developed in this study, utilizing the Wire Detach Unit. The system comprises a central motor-unit with motors and electronics, two distinct arm types (a 2-DOF rigid arm and a continuum arm), and two end-effector types (a parallel gripper and a multi-fingered gripper). These components can be interchangeably combined and are driven and controlled by shared actuators.
Specification
Value
wire tensil strength
1000 N
wire diameter
1 mm
wire type
Vectran [ 16 ]
winding pulley radius
15 mm
winding pulley width
10 mm
maximum winding length with same radius
942 mm
TABLE I: Specifications of the Wire Detach Unit.
Fig. 4: Design of the Wire Detach Unit. It consists of a winding pulley to take up the wire, a wire alignment pulley to ensure stable winding, a relay point to guide the wire, and convex-concave features for torque transmission. The convex-concave features have rounded edges to aid smooth interlocking. The entire unit is housed in a sector-shaped outer shell, allowing up to 6 units to be arranged in a circular pattern for collective attachment and detachment. This mechanism enables the seamless connection and disconnection of both the physical structure and the wire-based power transmission path.
Fig. 5: Design of the motor-unit and the motor-arm detacher. The motor-unit (left) houses the motors and features the female side of the detacher. The arm (right) is equipped with the male side, which includes multiple Wire Detach Units. The detacher employs a latch mechanism with pins on the male part and a rotating outer ring with pin holders on the female part, enabling quick and secure attachment and detachment.
Fig. 6: Design of the arm-end-effector detacher. The male part is on the arm side and the female part is on the end-effector side. A single Wire Detach Unit is integrated into each side the mechanism to transmit power to the end-effector. Similar to the motor-arm detacher, it uses a pin-and-locking-ring mechanism for quick attachment and detachment.
Fig. 7: Design of the 2-DOF rigid arm. It features a shoulder joint (joint1) and an elbow joint (joint2). Three wires for arm actuation are routed from the base and attached to the second link. A separate wire for the end-effector is guided through a Bowden cable to the detacher at the arm’s tip.
Fig. 8: Design of the continuum arm. The arm is constructed from a series of identical units, each composed of a central spring and two triangular plates. Wires for actuation run through the structure to the tip. A flexible sheet wraps around the springs to provide structural integrity and constrain excessive twisting.
Fig. 9: Design of the parallel gripper. It features two jaws that move in parallel. A single wire from the attached Wire Detach Unit drives the closing motion, while an elastic band provides the opening force. Bearings are used at sliding and bending points to ensure smooth operation.
Fig. 10: Design of the multi-fingered gripper. It has three underactuated fingers, each with three joints, driven by a single wire for closing and elastic bands for opening. This allows adaptive grasping. A common pulley inside the arm-ee detacher couples the three finger wires, requiring a slight modification to the detacher’s Wire Detach Unit.
Fig. 11: State transition diagram for the controller. The system can be in one of four states: FREE (motors off), ATTACH (active engagement assistance), CALIBRATE (joint angle estimation reset), and CONTROL (closed-loop operation). The diagram shows the permitted transitions between these states, managed according to operator commands and system status.
Fig. 12: Block diagram of the joint control system. The controller takes a reference joint angle qref and calculates motor torques Tref . The process involves a Joint Angle Follower, which computes reference wire tensions fref from the joint angle error, and a Joint Angle Estimator, which estimates the current joint angles q^ from motor encoder readings θ .
Fig. 13: Results of the strength and friction evaluation experiment for the Wire Detach Unit. Input tension was cycled from 0 to 450 N and back to 0 over 60 seconds. The deviation between input and output tension averaged approximately ± 16 N, which is sufficiently small compared to the ideal direct correspondence (red dotted line). The unit successfully withstood 450 N of tension without failure.
Fig. 14: Experiment showing the sequential attachment, control, and detachment of two different arms (rigid and continuum) from the motor-unit. The graphs on the right show the target and estimated joint angle transitions for both arms during control. In both cases, the estimated joint angles successfully track the target joint angles.
Fig. 15: Experiment showing the sequential attachment, control, and detachment of two different grippers on the rigid arm. Both grippers demonstrate the ability to properly grasp and manipulate objects according to their shape and size.
Comparison
RMSE [rad]
q vs. q^
0.087
qref vs. q^
0.145
qref vs. q
0.177
TABLE II: RMSE evaluation of the error between the target joint angle qref , estimated joint angle q^ , and actual joint angle q in the joint control state of the rigid arm. The results show that the joint angles can be estimated with sufficient accuracy from the wire length, and that there is sufficient tracking of the target joint angles.
Fig. 16: Transition of target joint angle qref , estimated joint angle q^ , and actual joint angle q in the joint control state of the rigid arm. It can be seen that q^ generally follows q , and q^ generally follows qref .
Department of Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan