Organizations: Institute of Computer Science and Engineering & College of Artificial Intelligence National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu, Taiwan
This study investigates the challenge of ambiguity faced by Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in understanding spatial semantics. Spatial cognition, shaped by cognitive psychology, spatial science, and cultural context, often assigns directionality to objects. However, natural language descriptions of spatial relations frequently omit explicit reference frames, leading to semantic ambiguity and potentially serious errors for embodied AI robots. Existing VLMs, due to insufficient training on reference frames and object orientations, often produce inconsistent responses. To address this issue, we construct a new dataset, AlloEgo-View, comprising (image, query, view-specific answer) triplets that capture key object relations from both allocentric and egocentric perspectives. The view-specific descriptions follow a structured spatial representation that annotate detailed scene descriptions, reference and target objects, their orientations, reference frames, and view types. Building on AlloEgo-View, we develop AlloEgo-VLM, a framework to disambiguate allocentric and egocentric reference frames, even under ambiguous queries, and to be easily integrated into existing VLMs via supervised fine-tuning. Furthermore, we deploy our framework onto an embodied robotic platform within NVIDIA Isaac Sim to validate its real-world feasibility in open-ended object searching tasks. Experiments highlight the limitations of current VLMs in handling view-specific queries and demonstrate the strong disambiguation ability of AlloEgo-VLM.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Under an ambiguous instruction, general VLMs suffer from high view ambiguity rate (VAR). AlloEgo-VLM resolves this by decoupling spatial semantics into explicit egocentric and allocentric perspectives, ensuring precise view-specific accuracy (VSA).
Dataset
Task Description
View Type
MCAF
RFF
Scale
CLEVR [ Johnson et al.(2017)Johnson, Hariharan, van der Maaten, Fei-Fei, Zitnick, and Girshick ]
Visual reasoning (synthetic QA)
Ego
△
✓
∼ 700K
GQA [ Hudson and Manning(2019) ]
VQA + scene graph reasoning
Ego
△
✓
∼ 22M
SpatialSense [ Yang et al.(2019)Yang, Russakovsky, and Deng ]
Pairwise spatial relation classification
Ego
✓
✓
∼ 11K
SPAR [ Zhang et al.(2025)Zhang, Chen, Zhou, Xu, Huang, Mei, Chen, Yuan, Cai, Huang, Quan, Xu, and Zhang ]
Spatial perception and reasoning
Ego
△
✓
∼ 7M
Thinking in Space [ Yang et al.(2024)Yang, Yang, Gupta, Fei-Fei, and Xie ]
Video reasoning and memory
Allo, Ego
×
×
∼ 5K
Perspective Aware [ Lee et al.(2025)Lee, Je, Park, Uy, Guibas, and Sung ]
Abstract perspective change
Allo, Ego
✓
×
-
Table 1: Comparison of spatial understanding datasets. MCAF denotes “multi-choice answer-free queries” (e.g., [ Yang et al.(2024)Yang, Yang, Gupta, Fei-Fei, and Xie ] requires verbose queries with predefined options). RFF denotes “reference-frame-free queries” (e.g., [ Li et al.(2025)Li, Li, Wang, Yan, Zhang, Chen, Hou, Jiang, Zhang, Shen, Lu, and Zhuang ] requires explicit reference-frame specification). AlloEgo-View supports natural queries such as “Where is the refrigerator?” ( ✓ = yes, × = no, △ = partial).
Figure 2: AlloEgo-View data curation pipeline. Each triplet consists of an image, a natural but potentially ambiguous query, and an answer that provides detailed egocentric and allocentric view descriptions.
Figure 5: Multi-stage training pipeline of AlloEgo-Adapter and progressive expansion of AlloEgo-View.
Figure 6: Spatial Query Classifier for filtering and categorizing spatial-related user queries.
Method
Params
VAR ↓
VSA ↑
Qwen 2.5-VL
7B
94.568%
50%
Llama 3.2-V
11B
100%
–
Gemma 3-V
4B
99.753%
100%
GPT-4o
–
99.259%
66.666%
GPT-4o mini
–
99.012%
75%
Table 2: Perspective tests of strong VLMs.
Method
Params
AD_RO↑
AD_TO↑
Ego↑
Allo↑
VS-Format (Qwen 2.5-VL)
7B
4.08
3.62
4.51
2.65
VS-Textbook (Qwen 2.5-VL)
7B
5.22
4.61
5.39
4.16
AlloEgo-VLM (Qwen 2.5-VL)
7B
7.94
8.04
8.19
6.25
VS-Format (Llama 3.2-V)
11B
3.82
3.53
4.36
3.74
VS-Textbook (Llama 3.2-V)
11B
4.95
4.56
5.03
3.38
AlloEgo-VLM (Llama 3.2-V)
11B
7.92
8.17
8.28
6.72
Table 3: Comparison of disambiguation capability.
Method
Para.
Size
Inf.
Acc.
Spatial Classifier
6M
0.25GB
≈ 2ms
100%
Qwen 2.5-VL
7B
7GB
≈ 260ms
99.53%
Llama 3.2-V
11B
11GB
≈ 700ms
99.71%
Gemma 3-V
4B
4GB
≈ 240ms
91.24%
Table 4: Capability for recognizing spatial queries.
Figure 7: 3D PCA projection of features encoded by the Spatial Query Classifier.
Figure 8: Progressive training of AlloEgo-Adapter on Qwen 2.5-VL-7B . Line: performance; bars: dataset size.
AQ (implicit allocentric SR)
EQ (explicit egocentric SR)
Scenario ¡reference obj¿
Qwen-For
Qwen-Txt
AlloEgo
Qwen-For
Qwen-Txt
AlloEgo
Case 1: Table (Non-directional)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
Case 2: Sofa (Facing Observer)
0.0
0.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
Case 3: Chair (Facing Observer)
0.2
0.2
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.9
Case 4: Chair (Facing Left)
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.8
Case 5: Human (Facing Observer)
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.5
Table 5: Navigation Success Rate (SR) for embodied search in Isaac Sim experiments. AQ (Ambiguous Queries) evaluate implicit allocentric transformations with unstated reference frames, while EQ (Explicit Queries) serve as an egocentric control benchmark for standard camera-space grounding using the phrase “from your perspective” .
Figure 9: Example multi-object scenarios in Isaac Sim for embodied object search tasks. Boxes are positioned in front of and behind the chair (left), while carts are placed on both sides of the human avatar (right).
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Grid set grids
Description d
[2] / [4] / [5] / [6] / [8]
Top / Left / Center / Right / Bottom
[1] / [3]
Top-left / Top-right
[7] / [9]
Bottom-left / Bottom-right
[1,2] , [1,4] / [2,3] , [3,6]
Top-left / Top-right
[4,7] , [7,8] / [6,9] , [8,9]
Bottom-left / Bottom-right
[2,5] / [5,8]
Upper-center / Lower-center
Appendix
Table 6: Mapping rules between grid sets and spatial descriptions
Dˉr←n1∑i=1ndri
Appendix
Algorithm 2 Depth-Based Relative Position Description
Figure 10: Examples of emergent reasoning in AlloEgo-VLM (with Qwen2.5-VL as the backbone). Behaviors after and before training stage 3 are shown.
Perspective taking is a fundamental component of spatial intelligence, requiring models interpret spatial relations from a specified viewpoint, such as that of another entity or an imagined observer. Despite the increasing spatial reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), they still struggle with perspective taking, often defaulting to the camera viewpoint when a query requires reasoning from a different perspective. We introduce Learning Reference Coordinate Frames for Perspective Taking (LeRF), a framework that trains VLMs to construct and use explicit reference frames for viewpoint-dependent reasoning. Given an image and a query, LeRF decides whether a coordinate frame is necessary. If so, it grounds the reference entity and predicts the frame's origin and entity-centered reference frame. A lightweight renderer overlays the frame onto the image, enabling subsequent reasoning over these visual cues without external perception models or explicit 3D reconstruction. To learn this process, we first perform supervised fine-tuning to teach selective tool invocation and reference coordinate frame prediction, followed by reinforcement learning on spatial VQA pairs to improve frame-guided reasoning. Across diverse perspective-taking benchmarks, LeRF consistently improves over its backbone and achieves strong performance against existing open-source methods. Further evaluations also show improved reference-frame grounding and orientation estimation, supporting the effectiveness of learned reference frames for viewpoint-dependent reasoning.
Bang Xiao, Wenqi Jia, Ozgur Kara +5
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · Zhiyuan College, Shanghai Jiao Tong University · University of California, Merced +2
Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive results on single-view vision tasks, but lack the multi-view spatial reasoning capabilities essential for embodied AI systems to understand 3D environments and manipulate objects across different viewpoints. In this work, we introduce Cross-View Relations (XVR), a large-scale dataset designed to teach VLMs spatial reasoning across multiple views. XVR comprises 100K vision-question-answer samples derived from 18K diverse 3D scenes and 70K robotic manipulation trajectories, spanning three fundamental spatial reasoning tasks: Correspondence (matching objects across views), Verification (validating spatial relationships), and Localization (identifying object positions). VLMs fine-tuned on XVR achieve substantial improvements on established multi-view and robotic spatial reasoning benchmarks (MindCube and RoboSpatial). When integrated as backbones in Vision-Language-Action models, XVR-trained representations improve success rates on RoboCasa. Our results demonstrate that explicit training on cross-view spatial relations significantly enhances multi-view reasoning and transfers effectively to real-world robotic manipulation.
Reasoning over language instructions in embodied tasks such as robotics often requires understanding spatial relations from a speaker's situated perspective. Humans infer such perspectives from shared environmental knowledge, activity context, and commonsense. Recent vision-language models (VLMs) appear capable of spatial reasoning, but their ability to infer a speaker's viewpoint from contextual cues and interpret situated spatial relations from that viewpoint remains unclear. We call this capability contextual observer grounding. To study this capability, we construct the Point-of-View Benchmark (POVBench), a dataset of 3D scenes and queries that disentangles Inferred, Stated, and Given forms of observer grounding in natural embodied communication. Given multi-view observations and a natural-language sentence, models must localize unseen or underspecified targets from situated spatial and contextual cues. Across state-of-the-art VLMs, localizing targets from directional language remains challenging, even when observer grounding is made explicit. We find that explicit breakdowns of observer-relative spatial reasoning improve target localization. Our project page is available at https://mimo-owl.github.io/POVBench/.
Mimo Shirasaka, Haochen Zhang, Yonatan Bisk
The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan · Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA, USA