How Many Samples Are Needed to Determine Causal Direction? Sharp Minimax Bounds for Bivariate LiNGAM

Causal discovery becomes particularly challenging when the available sample size is small relative to the number of variables. This challenge also arises in the linear non-Gaussian acyclic model (LiNGAM), an identifiable framework for causal discovery from observational data. DirectLiNGAM estimates a causal order, which arranges variables so that causes precede their effects, by sequentially identifying an exogenous variable and removing its linear effect from the remaining variables. We establish a structural limitation of this procedure: when the number of variables exceeds the sample size, repeated residualization necessarily becomes degenerate before the full causal order can be determined. Our analysis further reveals that each residual can be reconstructed using only a graph-determined subset of variables already placed earlier in the causal order, termed the active boundary. This result motivates AdaPS-LiNGAM (Adaptive Predecessor Selection LiNGAM), which reconstructs each residual directly from the original observations using an adaptively chosen sparse subset of those earlier variables. The same subset-selection principle is also applied to the final pruning step for edge estimation. Experiments on synthetic data demonstrate that AdaPS-LiNGAM provides accurate causal-structure recovery in sample-limited settings and degrades more gradually as the sample size decreases.

Causal-discovery algorithms return a directed graph, yet provide no principled means of distinguishing edge directions identified by the data from those assigned without an identifying assumption. Under the standard Markov and faithfulness conditions, the observational distribution identifies only a Markov equivalence class; orientations within that class are not determined by the joint distribution and cannot be recovered from additional samples alone, but require either a functional restriction or an intervention. We introduce a protocol for observational causal discovery on continuous data that attaches to each candidate edge a discrete impossibility certificate: a RESOLVED code records the identifiability theorem under which the direction was committed, while an IMPOSSIBLE code records the failure mode together with the specific question a domain expert must answer to resolve it. The bivariate cascade is extended with five gated identifiability tiers LSNM, IGCI, Stein, MDL, and PEIT that abstain when their precondition test rejects. Two oracle primitives, the meta-hub query and the node-children query, jointly establish an upper bound of $1+K$ expert interactions sufficient to recover any DAG, where $K$ denotes the number of non-leaf vertices. Under an ideal-oracle assumption, the bound is met exactly on the asia, sachs, child, and alarm benchmarks.

We study causal discovery from observational data when some variables are hidden and the data-generating process follows a location-scale noise model (LSNM). Existing methods that handle hidden confounders typically assume additive noise, but in practice, causes often modulate not just the mean but also the variance of their effects. We prove that acyclic directed mixed graphs (ADMGs) satisfying a bow-free condition are identifiable under LSNM with hidden variables, establishing the first identifiability result for causally insufficient models beyond noise additivity. We further provide sufficient conditions for identifying causal direction even when the bow-free assumption is violated. Our two-stage algorithm, LSNM-UV, is sound and complete, and experiments demonstrate improved performance over additive baselines on heteroscedastic data.