cs.LGAug 17, 2026

Toward Optimal Second-Order Path-Length Guarantee for Adversarial Multi-Armed Bandits

Authors: Mengxiao Zhang

Organizations: University of Iowa

Abstract

We study second-order path-length regret in adversarial KK-armed bandits against oblivious loss sequences. Bubeck et al. [2019] designed an algorithm that achieves O~(K+KQ∞,1)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(K+\sqrt{KQ_{\infty,1}}) regret, where Q∞,1Q_{\infty,1} is the first-order path length, and left open whether O~(poly(K)1+Q∞,2)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\text{poly}(K)\sqrt{1+Q_{\infty,2}}) regret is achievable under bandit feedback, where Q∞,2Q_{\infty,2} is the second-order path length. Somewhat surprisingly, we resolve this question positively by showing that with a more involved analysis, the exact same algorithm of Bubeck et al. [2019] achieves O(Klog⁡(KT)+Klog⁡(KT)(1+Q∞,2))\mathcal{O}\left(K\log(KT)+\sqrt{K\log(KT)\bigl(1+Q_{\infty,2}\bigr)}\right) expected regret when Q∞,2Q_{\infty,2} is known, where TT is the horizon. This matches the Ω(KQ∞,2)Ω(\sqrt{KQ_{\infty,2}}) lower bound up to logarithmic factors and additive terms. We further remove the knowledge of Q∞,2Q_{\infty,2} using an adaptive restart scheme whose path-length estimator has uniformly bounded increments.

Explore similar work

Sep 29, 2026

Bandits with Multiple Optimal Arms: Minimax Regret and Non-Adaptivity

We study multi-armed bandits (MAB) with multiple optimal arms, motivated by the fact that many practical decision making problems admit multiple correct answers. For KK-armed bandits with AA optimal arms, we first provide a sharper analysis of previous sub-sampling algorithms (De Heide et al., 2021; Zhu and Nowak, 2020), establishing a O~(K−AKAT)\tilde{O}\Big(\frac{K-A}{\sqrt{KA}}\sqrt{T} \Big) minimax regret, where TT is the total number of interactions and O~(⋅)\tilde O(\cdot) drops all constant and logarithmic factors, improving the previous O~(KT/A)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{KT/A}) regret. We then provide a matching lower bound up to logarithmic factors, indicating that our established rate is nearly minimax-optimal. We further show that the knowledge of AA up to O~(1)\tilde{O}(1) factors is necessary to achieve near-optimal regret, as near-optimal algorithms for one number of optimal arms must incur substantially larger regret than optimal regret for a smaller number. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive minimax characterization of KK-armed bandits with AA over the entire range of 1≤A≤K−11 \leq A \leq K-1.
Apr 28, 2026

Online learning with Erdős-Rényi side-observation graphs

We consider adversarial multi-armed bandit problems where the learner is allowed to observe losses of a number of arms beside the arm that it actually chose. We study the case where all non-chosen arms reveal their loss with a fixed but unknown probability rr, independently of each other and the action of the learner. We propose two algorithms that work for different ranges of rr. We show that after TT rounds in a bandit problem with NN arms, the expected regret of our first algorithm is O((T/r)log⁡N)O(\sqrt{(T /r) \log N }) whenever r≥(log⁡T)/(2N)r\ge(\log T)/(2N), while our second algorithm achieves a regret of O((T/r)log⁡(N+T))O(\sqrt{(T/r) \log (N+T)}) for smaller values of rr. We also give a quick estimation procedure that decides the range of~rr. All our bounds are within logarithmic factors of the best achievable performance of any algorithm that is even allowed to know~rr.
Sep 11, 2026

Toward Optimal Switching Regret for Multi-Armed Bandits with Oblivious Adversary

We study switching regret in adversarial multi-armed bandits, where the learner competes with an arm sequence that changes at most SS times. When SS is known, an optimal expected regret of O~((S+1)KT)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT}) is obtainable [Auer et al., 2002]. However, when SS is unknown, Marinov and Zimmert [2021] show that this guarantee is impossible under an adaptive adversary. In this paper, we show that a single algorithm achieves O~((S+1)KT)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{(S+1)KT}) expected regret for every SS against an oblivious adversary, resolving an open problem of Auer et al. [2019b]. Our algorithm combines a fixed-share learner initialized with a small learning rate and dyadic-interval subroutines that search for local improvements using randomized learning rates and implicit exploration. Importantly, a non-uniform prior favors following the main learner, keeping the cost of maintaining many subroutines small. When the subroutines accumulate sufficient improvement over the main learner, its learning rate doubles, allowing adaptation to the unknown number of comparator switches SS.