Retrieval-guided Twin Fusion with Similarity-aware Contrast for Molecule-Text Alignment
Authors: Shunshun Gu, Shengqi Qiu, Hang Zhou, Xiao Luo
Organizations: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
This paper studies the problem of molecule-text alignment, which aims to project molecules and their textual descriptions into a joint latent space for downstream tasks including molecule search and molecular property prediction. Previous approaches typically combine graph structure mining with contrastive learning to enhance joint representation learning. However, they typically neglect fine-grained semantic relationships between substructures and texts, leading to suboptimal performance on downstream tasks. Towards this end, we propose a novel approach named Retrieval-guided Twin Fusion with Similarity-aware Contrast (RISEN) for molecule-text alignment. The core idea of RISEN is to construct a latent twin molecule for each substructure with cross-modal retrieval for semantic enhancement. In particular, for each substructure query, we retrieve relevant textual descriptions and sample several molecules that share similar descriptions of substructures. Then, we aggregate their representations via attention pooling for a twin latent representation, which would be further fused with the original substructure for representation enrichment. In addition, we measure the similarity across substructures and texts, which would further guide cross-modal contrastive learning with soft thresholding. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets validate the superiority of the proposed RISEN in comparison with existing baselines.
Figures & tables
Text to Molecule
Molecule to Text
Methods
# Params
R@1
R@5
R@10
MRR
R@1
R@5
R@10
MRR
1D SMILES + 2D Graph
MoMu ( Su et al., 2022 )
111M
4.90
14.48
20.69
10.33
5.08
12.82
18.93
9.89
MolFM ( Luo et al., 2023 )
138M
16.14
30.67
39.54
23.63
13.90
28.69
36.21
21.42
MolFM (fine-tuned) ( Luo et al., 2023 )
138M
29.39
50.26
58.49
39.34
29.76
50.53
58.63
39.56
MolCA ( Liu et al., 2023b )
111M
35.09
62.14
69.77
47.33
37.95
66.81
74.48
50.80
Table 1. Performance comparison for zero-shot molecule-text retrieval on PCDes test set (scaffold split). Baseline results are quoted from Park et al. (2025) . We bold the best results and underline the second-best.
Text to Molecule
Molecule to Text
Methods
R@1
R@20
R@1
R@20
1D SMILES + 2D Graph
MoMu-S ( Su et al., 2022 )
40.8
86.1
40.9
86.2
MoMu-K ( Su et al., 2022 )
41.6
87.8
41.8
87.5
MoleculeSTM ( Liu et al., 2023a )
44.3
90.3
45.8
88.4
MolCA ( Liu et al., 2023b )
66.0
93.5
66.6
94.6
Table 2. Performance comparison for zero-shot molecule-text retrieval on PubChem324kV2 test set. Baseline results are quoted from Park et al. (2025) . We bold the best results and underline the second-best.
Methods
BBBP
Tox21
ToxCast
ClinTox
MUV
HIV
BACE
SIDER
Avg.
MoleculeSTM ( Liu et al., 2023a )
70.6
75.7
65.2
86.6
65.7
77.0
82.0
63.7
73.3
MolFM ( Luo et al., 2023 )
72.9
77.2
64.4
79.7
76.0
78.8
83.9
64.2
74.6
MoMu ( Su et al., 2022 )
70.5
75.6
63.4
79.9
70.6
75.9
76.7
60.5
71.6
MolCA-SMILES ( Liu et al., 2023b )
70.8
76.0
56.2
89.0
–
–
79.3
61.1
–
Atomas ( Zhang et al., 2025 )
73.7
77.9
66.9
93.2
76.3
80.6
83.1
64.4
77.0
MolBridge ( Park et al., 2025 )
77.6
84.7
70.3
94.8
76.8
77.8
84.5
66.9
79.2
Table 3. Results for molecular property prediction tasks (ROC-AUC %) on the MoleculeNet benchmark. We bold the best results and underline the second-best.
Figure 1. Sensitivity analysis of the prototype fusion weight α (left) and the soft-label mixing weight β (right) on PCDes. Two line charts compare retrieval performance across prototype fusion weights and soft-label mixing weights on the PCDes benchmark.
Figure 2. Qualitative comparison of functional-group phrases identified by RISEN and MolBridge ( Park et al., 2025 ) against ground-truth phrases from PubChem descriptions. A qualitative case-study figure compares chemical functional-group phrases identified by RISEN and MolBridge against PubChem ground-truth phrases.
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory · Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo