Cross-View Urban Sensing: Mapping Subjective Streetscape Perception via AlphaEarth Embeddings and Urban Context

Visual perception of urban streetscapes underpins evidence-based decisions in landscape planning, public health, and place-making. Yet models trained on a few well-photographed metropolises systematically misjudge underrepresented districts, propagating geographic bias into downstream policy. We address this gap with HVSP-LL, a lifelong learning framework that couples a stratified visual-semantic pivoting module with an equity-aware rehearsal mechanism. The pivoting module organises landscape concepts along a three-tier ontology (macro structure, meso composition, micro element) and aligns image features to learnable semantic anchors at each tier, providing transferable representations that resist distributional drift. The lifelong adaptation component sequentially absorbs new urban regions while constraining inter-region perception gaps through a worst-region sample-reweighting objective and a structurally-aware exemplar buffer. We evaluate HVSP-LL on a panoramic streetscape benchmark assembled from twelve cities across four continents and seven perceptual dimensions. The framework attains 0.834 Spearman correlation on the held-out city sequence, an absolute 6.1 point improvement over the strongest continual baseline, and shrinks the inter-city perception gap to 0.094 -- a 38% reduction relative to the strongest continual baseline (0.151) and a 57% reduction relative to a representative regularisation baseline (0.218). Ablations confirm that each tier of the pivoting hierarchy contributes monotonically, and the equity-aware rehearsal converts mean backward transfer from -0.038 (without retention) to +0.013, eliminating catastrophic forgetting on the held-out sequence. Our results indicate that hierarchical anchoring is a practical pathway toward geographically equitable streetscape inference at city scale.

Streetscape quality has become a central concern in contemporary urban planning, particularly within the framework of the pedestrian-friendly 15-minute city, where walkability and public-space quality are increasingly recognized as key determinants of urban performance. However, assessing streetscape qualities across large suburban and peri-urban territories remains challenging due to the time and resource demands of conventional field surveys. This paper presents a planning-oriented assessment of streetscape qualities in the north-eastern periphery of Nice (France) using the latest release of SAGAI (Streetscape Analysis with Generative AI), an open-source workflow that leverages vision-language models (VLMs) for large-scale streetscape analysis from Google Street View imagery. The new release addresses limitations of the original framework through improved image acquisition, geographically consistent view generation, support for multiple VLM architectures, consensus-based inference, and an integrated analytical environment. The workflow is applied to several thousand street-level observations to evaluate qualities relevant to pedestrian-friendly urban environments: sidewalk presence, pedestrian entrance density, and vegetation. The resulting maps reveal that the desired streetscape qualities characterize only a fraction of today's suburban streetscapes, mainly in compact developments and traditional suburban faubourgs, while they are particularly lacking on residential hills. The analysis demonstrates the potential of contemporary VLMs to support urban diagnostics in extensive suburban territories where fieldwork would be prohibitively time-consuming. Beyond the case study, the paper illustrates how recent advances in vision-language models can contribute to evidence-based planning by enabling scalable, flexible, and interpretable assessments of urban public-space quality.

Street-view imagery is increasingly analysed with vision-language models (VLMs) to infer urban attributes, but predictive accuracy alone does not show how much a photograph contributes beyond data already available for the same place. Using three VLMs, we compare image-based predictions with existing urban data for seven attributes drawn from five public resources. Each urban unit is evaluated with imagery, with location or text context, and against non-image predictions from nearby observations or public records. We also replace images and add conflicting records to test which source the predictions follow. Nearby observations or public records matched or exceeded image-only predictions for road damage, curb ramps, population, and house price. Images were more informative for building type, building function, and the floor count of low-rise buildings. For floor count, the advantage of images over nearby OpenStreetMap labels increased by 5.7 percentage points per doubling of distance to the nearest labelled building and declined for tall buildings whose rooflines often fell outside the frame. When images and records disagreed, predictions usually moved towards the supplied record. Released OpenFACADES floor annotations, generated with OpenStreetMap floor values as input, showed the same dependence: their agreement with the reference increased with building height, whereas that of image-only reruns decreased. The value of street-view imagery therefore depends on whether an attribute is visible and how well the place is already covered by existing data. Because machine-derived labels are often reused as references, these comparisons also bear on how urban datasets are documented and evaluated.