GRNEdit: Efficient General Video Editing from a New Binary-Evidence Perspective in Generative Refinement Networks
Organizations: Xidian University · MiLM Plus, Xiaomi Inc.
Abstract
Instruction-based general video editing seeks to unify diverse editing operations within a single, intuitive interface. Existing approaches often rely on resource-intensive conditioning, using either heavyweight branches or costly source concatenation. Is there any efficient way to model editing intent? Thus, we introduce GRNEdit, a lightweight two-stage framework. GRN inspires our approach by encoding visual semantics through combinations of bits. Through task-specific fine-tuning, we take this representation further and recast editing semantics as local retain-or-flip decisions over individual bits. Source information is consequently modeled as coordinate-wise evidence supporting the observed binary states, while the GRN backbone remains responsible for resolving their global composition into coherent generative semantics. In Stage I, a compact encoder translates discrete source codes into continuous evidence signals, which GRN assimilates throughout binary refinement. Inspired by null-prompt training for classifier-free guidance, we further assign the null condition an editing-specific meaning: an empty instruction denotes no edit and is supervised through source reconstruction. This identity pathway not only implicitly strengthens evidence utilization and content preservation in Stage I, but also produces a source-preserving state in the same representation space as the edited state. Stage II can therefore directly compare each edited state with its source-preserving counterpart and use their discrepancy to revise unresolved target-bit decisions. Trained on only 0.6M pairs with less than 3% conditioning parameters, GRNEdit-2B and GRNEdit-8B achieve scores of 4.03 and 4.18 on OpenVE-Bench. The 2B model outperforms multiple 14B open-source editors, while the 8B model performs on par with leading open-source editors.
Figures & tables
| Method | Params / Time | Overall | G.Style | Bkg.Chg. | L.Chg. | L.Rem. | L.Add. | Sub. | Cond. Params | |
| Runway Aleph (Commercial) | Commercial | 4.49 | 4.41 | 4.40 | 4.31 | 4.64 | 4.36 | 4.21 | N/A | |
| VACE (ICCV 2025) | 14B / | 545s | 3.01 | 3.46 | 2.81 | 2.47 | 3.99 | 1.76 | 4.41 | 3.05B |
| Omni-Video (Tech. Rep. 2025) | 11B / | 312s | 3.66 | 3.41 | 4.11 | 3.75 | 4.52 | 2.80 | 4.95 | B |
| InsViE (ICCV 2025) | 2B / | 64s | 3.25 | 3.63 | 2.68 | 2.82 | 3.56 | 2.25 | 4.77 | 59M |
| Lucy-Edit (Tech. Rep. 2025) | 5B / | 36s | 3.77 | 3.64 | 3.25 | 3.93 | 3.95 | 3.92 | 4.23 | 0.6M |
| Kiwi-Edit (arXiv 2026) | 8B / | 45s | 4.17 | 4.24 | 4.01 | 4.30 | 4.60 | 4.13 | 4.23 | 3B |
| Add | Remove | Replace | Style | |||||||||||||
| Method | ||||||||||||||||
| InsViE | 2.60 | 3.10 | 3.46 | 3.05 | 2.44 | 3.76 | 3.29 | 3.16 | 2.10 | 3.91 | 3.49 | 3.17 | 8.17 | 8.21 | 7.35 | 7.91 |
| Lucy-Edit | 6.47 | 5.70 | 6.77 | 6.31 | 7.02 | 6.88 | 6.81 | 6.90 | 7.08 | 6.21 | 6.88 | 6.72 | 4.65 | 4.67 | 5.17 | 4.83 |
| DITTO | 6.70 | 7.57 | 8.41 | 7.56 | 5.48 | 6.67 | 6.93 | 6.36 | 4.56 | 7.21 | 7.96 | 6.58 | 9.20 | 9.07 | 8.77 | 9.01 |
| ReCo | 8.54 | 7.55 | 8.61 | 8.23 | 7.28 | 6.90 | 6.82 | 7.00 | 9.43 | 8.01 | 8.77 | 8.74 | 9.42 | 9.19 | 8.90 | 9.17 |
| OURS-2B | 7.53 | 6.91 | 7.44 | 7.29 | 8.39 | 7.76 | 7.81 | 7.99 | 8.60 | 7.24 | 7.99 | 7.94 | 9.03 | 9.23 | 8.97 | 9.08 |
| Configuration | Overall | G.Style | L.Chg. | Sub. |
| (a) Source-evidence injection placement | ||||
| Head only (1) | 3.88 | 4.03 | 3.68 | 4.87 |
| First + last chunks (2) | 4.03 | 4.36 | 3.93 | 4.72 |
| Uniform 3 chunks | 3.97 | 4.23 | 3.77 | 4.74 |
| All 7 chunks | 3.95 | 4.29 | 3.78 | 4.62 |
| (b) Identity supervision ratio | ||||
Video Editing
Video editing uses AI to alter, compose, relight, or reorganize moving footage while controlling how changes persist across frames.
See all 178 papers