Unlocking Motion in Expressions: Temporal Calibration for Referring Video Object Segmentation
Organizations: School of Computer Science & Technology Soochow University Suzhou, China
Abstract
Referring Video Object Segmentation (RVOS) aims to segment referred objects at the pixel level in video sequences based on natural language descriptions. Existing methods typically introduce motion information within a unified cross-modal temporal modeling framework, where language cues are used for target localization and segmentation. However, the dependency of expressions on motion semantics is not explicitly modeled, making it difficult to adaptively adjust the use of motion information according to different semantic requirements. To address these issues, we propose an Expression-driven Motion Calibration (EMC) framework for RVOS that explicitly unlocks and leverages the motion semantics within expressions. The proposed method extracts interpretable motion control signals from expressions via a Motion Signal Processing (MSP) module, and employs a Motion Influence Calibration (MIC) module to adjust the contribution of motion cues during temporal decision making. In addition, a Semantic Temporal Stage Construction (STSC) module is introduced to build expression-relevant temporal stages, providing a compact temporal candidate space for motion calibration. Through extensive evaluation on six standard benchmarks, including Ref-YouTubeVOS, Ref-DAVIS17, MeViS (valid/valid), A2D-Sentences, and JHMDB-Sentences, the superiority of our method is validated. We will release the code on https://github.com/Jeven7/EMC.
Figures & tables
| Method | Publication | Ref-YouTube-VOS | Ref-DAVIS17 | MeViS | ||||||
| URVOS ( Seo et al., 2020 ) | ECCV 2020 | 47.2 | 45.3 | 49.2 | 51.6 | 47.3 | 56.0 | 31.0 | 29.8 | 32.2 |
| ReferFormer ( Wu et al., 2022 ) | CVPR 2022 | 62.9 | 61.3 | 64.6 | 61.1 | 58.1 | 64.1 | 27.8 | 25.7 | 29.9 |
| MTTR ( Botach et al., 2022 ) | CVPR 2022 | 55.3 | 54.0 | 56.6 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| HTML ( Han et al., 2023 ) | ICCV 2023 | 63.4 | 61.6 | 65.2 | 62.1 | 59.2 | 65.1 | - | - | - |
| SgMg ( Miao et al., 2023 ) | ICCV 2023 | 65.7 | 63.9 | 67.4 | 63.3 | 60.6 | 66.0 | - | - | - |
| Method | Publication | MeViS (valid u ) | ||
| LMPM ( Ding et al., 2023 ) | ICCV 2023 | 40.2 | 36.5 | 43.9 |
| DsHmp ( He and Ding, 2024 ) | CVPR 2024 | 55.3 | 51.0 | 60.4 |
| VISA-7B ( Yan et al., 2024a ) | ECCV 2024 | 51.2 | 48.0 | 54.4 |
| DMVS ( Fang et al., 2025 ) | CVPR 2025 | 58.3 | 52.6 | 63.9 |
| SSA ( Pan et al., 2025 ) | CVPR 2025 | 57.8 | 52.3 | 63.1 |
| Method | A2D-Sentences | JHMDB-Sentences | ||
| oIoU | mIoU | oIoU | mIoU | |
| ReferFormer ( Wu et al., 2022 ) | 78.6 | 70.3 | 73 | 71.8 |
| SgMg ( Miao et al., 2023 ) | 79.9 | 72 | 73.7 | 72.5 |
| SOC ( Luo et al., 2023 ) | 80.7 | 72.5 | 73.6 | 72.3 |
| WaveCL ( Chen et al., 2025 ) | 79.2 | 71.0 | 73.0 | 71.8 |
| DAVLS ( Cao et al., 2026 ) | 80.9 | 72.4 | 73.6 | 72.5 |
| ID | Components | MeViS | ||||
| STSC | MSP | MIC | ||||
| 1 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | 52.6 | 49.8 | 55.3 |
| 2 | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | 53.3 | 50.5 | 56.1 |
| 3 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | 53.7 | 50.9 | 56.5 |
| 4 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 54.9 | 52.2 | 57.6 |
| MeViS | |||
| 0.05 | 54.7 | 52.0 | 57.5 |
| 0.1 | 54.9 | 52.2 | 57.6 |
| 0.2 | 54.7 | 52.0 | 57.4 |
| 0.3 | 54.8 | 52.1 | 57.5 |
| ID | Components | MeViS | ||||
| Visual | Text | Time | ||||
| 1 | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | 54.5 | 51.8 | 57.2 |
| 2 | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | 54.4 | 51.7 | 57.1 |
| 3 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | 54.5 | 51.7 | 57.2 |
| 4 | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | 53.7 | 50.9 | 56.4 |
| 5 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | 54.5 | 51.9 | 57.2 |
Appendix figures & tables14 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Dataset | #Samples | Acc (%) | Prec (%) | Rec (%) | F1 (%) |
| Ref-DAVIS17 | 100 | 96.0 | 90.6 | 96.7 | 93.5 |
| Ref-YouTube-VOS | 150 | 96.7 | 92.3 | 100.0 | 96.0 |
| MeViS | 200 | 95.5 | 97.9 | 95.9 | 96.9 |
| Dataset | Over- detection | Weak motion | Implicit / Ambiguous | Total |
| Ref-DAVIS17 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Ref-YouTube-VOS | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MeViS | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| Total | 11 | 3 | 4 | 18 |
| Type | Expression | MSP Prediction | Human Annotation | Analysis |
| Weak motion | the rabbit that is eating | Static | Dynamic | subtle motion is overlooked |
| Implicit motion | the last sheep to appear | Static | Dynamic | motion is implied but not explicit |
| Over-detection | a guitar being played by second man | Dynamic | Static | verb triggers false motion detection |
| Ambiguous action | monkey with a monkey on its back | Dynamic | Static | does not necessarily imply motion |
| Semantic ambiguity | a cow is standing far behind | Dynamic | Static | misinterpreted as motion-related context |
| A2D-Sentences | |||||
| Method | Precision | ||||
| Gavrilyuk et al. ( Gavrilyuk et al., 2018 ) | 47.5 | 34.7 | 21.1 | 8.0 | 0.2 |
| MTTR ( Botach et al., 2022 ) | 75.4 | 71.2 | 63.8 | 48.5 | 16.9 |
| ReferFormer ( Wu et al., 2022 ) | 83.1 | 80.4 | 74.1 | 57.9 | 21.2 |
| SOC ( Luo et al., 2023 ) | 82.1 | 82.7 | 76.5 | 60.7 | 25.2 |
| Ref-DAVIS17 | |||
| 0.1 | 77.56 | 74.41 | 80.71 |
| 0.2 | 77.57 | 74.42 | 80.72 |
| 0.3 | 77.63 | 74.49 | 80.77 |
| 0.4 | 77.65 | 74.51 | 80.79 |
| Ref-YouTube | Ref-DAVIS17 | MeViS | |||||||
| 0 | 71.8 | 69.8 | 73.9 | 75.5 | 71.7 | 79.3 | 52.2 | 49.3 | 55.1 |
| 0.25 | 74.4 | 72.4 | 76.3 | 77.5 | 74.3 | 80.7 | 54.8 | 52.1 | 57.5 |
| 0.5 | 74.7 | 72.6 | 76.8 | 77.7 | 74.5 | 80.8 | 54.9 | 52.2 | 57.6 |
| 0.75 | 74.2 | 72.3 | 76.1 | 77.1 | 73.9 | 80.3 | 54.5 | 51.8 | 57.2 |
| 1 | 74.1 | 72.2 | 76.0 | 77.1 | 74 | 80.2 | 54.4 | 51.7 | 57.1 |
| Setting | FPS (frames/s) | Runtime (s/pair) | Memory (GB) |
| MSP | 16.81 | 1.57 | 15.0 |
| STSC | 20.11 | 1.31 | 1.3 |
| EMC | 7.34 | 6.73 | 10.0 |
Referring Video Object Segmentation
Referring video object segmentation grounds language descriptions in video frames and produces temporally consistent masks for the described objects.
See all 42 papers