Organizations: Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA · University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA · Parsons Corporation, USA · Jacobs, USA · University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA · Neel-Schaffer, Inc., USA
Deep learning-based object detectors are fundamental to intelligent transportation systems, enabling traffic monitoring, vehicle analytics, and infrastructure management. However, achieving both fine-grained vehicle recognition and robust cross-city domain generalization remains challenging. We present the Domain-Robust Asymmetric Fusion Ensemble (DRAFE), which combines independently trained LW-DETR and RF-DETR detectors for cross-city fine-grained traffic object detection. DRAFE employs a two-stage training strategy that first pretrains complementary detectors on diverse public traffic datasets using pseudo-label expansion and human-in-the-loop annotation refinement, producing a curated corpus of 6,049 images and 203,619 annotations, before challenge-compliant fine-tuning on the Project Hafnia Track 6 dataset. At inference, DRAFE applies anchor-conditioned class-consistent matching, reliability-weighted coordinate fusion, agreement-aware confidence recalibration, and complementary hypothesis recovery. On AI City Challenge 2026 Track 6, DRAFE achieves 0.4022 mAP, ranks sixth among 25 participating teams, and improves by 0.0553 mAP over a preliminary ensemble evaluated under identical benchmark conditions.
Figures & tables
Detector
Role
Primary contribution
LW-DETR XLarge-A
Anchor
Dense, high-recall hypothesis set
LW-DETR XLarge-B
Support
Localization consensus and additional recall
RF-DETR Base
Support
Architecturally complementary detections
Table 1: Asymmetric role assignment of the constituent detectors.
Figure 1: Overview of the DRAFE training and inference framework. During challenge-specific training, each Hafnia managed experiment combines the platform-hosted dataset with a trainer package, execution command, and selected GPU configuration.
Component
Setting
Anchor detector
LW-DETR XLarge-A
Support detectors
LW-DETR XLarge-B; RF-DETR Base
Reliability weights
(0.42,0.32,0.26)
Class constraint
Exact class identity
Matching strategy
Greedy one-to-one matching
Fusion IoU threshold
0.55
Table 2: DRAFE inference configuration.
Model
Role
mAP
AP 50
AP 75
AP S
AP M
AP L
AR @1
AR @10
AR 100
AR S
AR M
AR L
Boxes/img
Preliminary ensemble
Comparison
0.3469
0.4732
0.3596
0.0515
0.1864
0.4800
0.2843
0.4227
0.4368
0.0840
0.2518
0.5779
300.00
LW-DETR XLarge-A
Anchor
0.3841
0.5253
0.3998
0.0557
0.2154
0.5276
0.4079
0.6467
0.6881
0.2323
0.4892
0.8193
300.00
LW-DETR XLarge-B
Homogeneous support
0.3822
0.5210
0.4051
0.0452
0.2015
0.5443
0.3957
0.6349
0.6709
0.2195
0.4571
0.8143
300.00
RF-DETR Base
Heterogeneous support
0.3836
0.5254
0.4048
0.0476
0.2070
0.5232
0.3868
0.5916
0.6169
0.1143
0.3820
0.7603
77.66
Table 3: Standalone and preliminary ensemble performance on the hidden test set.
Method
mAP
AP 50
AP 75
AP S
AP M
AP L
AR 100
Preliminary ensemble
0.3469
0.4732
0.3596
0.0515
0.1864
0.4800
0.4368
LW-X A
0.3841
0.5253
0.3998
0.0557
0.2154
0.5276
0.6881
DRAFE
0.4022
0.5333
0.4259
0.0571
0.2335
0.5460
0.6981
Difference from preliminary ensemble
+0.0553
+0.0601
+0.0663
+0.0056
+0.0471
+0.0660
+0.2613
Difference from LW-X A
+0.0181
+0.0080
+0.0261
+0.0014
+0.0181
+0.0184
+0.0100
Table 4: Full-test performance of the preliminary ensemble, strongest standalone component, and DRAFE.
Figure 2: Qualitative comparison of standalone detectors and DRAFE.
Configuration
mAP
AP 50
AP 75
AP S
AP M
AP L
AR 100
Three-model DRAFE
0.4074
0.5398
0.4312
0.0604
0.2312
0.5542
0.6968
Four-model support ensemble
0.4068
0.5379
0.4321
0.0584
0.2245
0.5528
0.6999
Table 5: Development-set ablation on ensemble size.
Rank
Team
mAP
AP 50
AP 75
AP S
AP M
AP L
1
SKKU-AL-T1
0.4753
0.6207
0.5031
0.0920
0.3041
0.6110
2
BIT-ODL
0.4281
0.5539
0.4568
0.0637
0.2639
0.5669
3
Remote Vibecoders from Chisinau
0.4176
0.5727
0.4521
0.0790
0.2739
0.5339
4
BK2TheFuture
0.4169
0.5289
0.4407
0.0591
0.2210
0.5548
5
S2 Detection
0.4114
0.5447
0.4414
0.0747
0.2596
0.5407
6
VisionOps/DRAFE
0.4022
0.5333
0.4259
0.0571
0.2335
0.5460
Table 6: AI City Challenge 2026 Track 6 leaderboard based on each team’s best reported full-test score.
Real-world deployment of traffic surveillance systems is bottlenecked by geographic domain shift, in which models trained in one city underperform when applied to an unseen target city. Conventional domain adaptation relies on hyperparameter-sensitive architectures or direct profiling of target data. Both are fundamentally precluded in privacy-conscious ecosystems that require completely blind training and evaluation loops. In this setting, we explore the effects of pre-training and augmentation in addressing the domain shift problem. Specifically, we propose a new modular training pipeline for object detection structured around two core orthogonal pillars: (1) a multi-dataset pre-training strategy featuring a class-agnostic objectness distillation to decouple structural vehicle geometry from semantic taxonomies, and (2) a domain-resilient augmentation stream featuring a novel Grayworld transformation that forces global attention heads to strip volatile chromatic shortcuts in favor of robust shape priors. When evaluated with the real-time transformer-based detector RF-DETR, our framework bridges cross-city distribution gaps while using limited GPU memory (16GB). Our optimized variants, RF-DETR-HR and RF-DETR-Grayworld, deliver a substantial empirical gain of +24.29 over the baseline, achieving 1st place (47.53 mAP) on the AI City Challenge Track 6 leaderboard. Code and data are available at: SKKUAutoLab/aic26_cross_city.
Long Hoang Pham, Quoc Pham-Nam Ho, Huy-Hung Nguyen +10
Automation Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea
Cross-city object detection requires a detector trained in one city to generalize to an unlabeled target city. In AI City Challenge 2026 Track 6, we analyze archived configurations of a single RF-DETR-Large detector inside an air-gapped Training-as-a-Service platform whose server returns only an aggregate COCO-style AP over a hidden mixture of source- and target-city images. Frozen 1120 x 1120 inference of a checkpoint trained at 704 x 704 achieved the highest aggregate AP among the evaluated configurations (0.3272 -> 0.3654, +0.0382) without any parameter update, with the largest relative gain on small objects and the largest absolute gain on medium objects, at 2.53x the input pixels. A warm-start 1120px fine-tuning recipe reached 0.3470 while its in-domain validation AP rose (0.767 -> 0.789), a caution that in-domain validation is an unreliable model-selection signal under aggregate-only cross-city feedback. Because that run's evaluation used a higher confidence threshold than the inference-only runs (0.05 vs. 0.01), we treat its score as a descriptive archived outcome rather than a controlled verdict on fine-tuning. Gray-world normalization did not meaningfully change the frozen-1120 result, and a rectangular run was found by audit to have used an unintended portrait orientation. We release verbatim platform commands, configuration snapshots, and an explicit evidence boundary for every claim. Each configuration was submitted once and the best was selected on the hidden server, so these are exploratory, audited findings about the aggregate mixture; they do not establish target-city-specific improvement.
Robust vehicle detection from fixed CCTV cameras is critical for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Yet existing benchmarks predominantly feature relatively homogeneous, highly organized traffic patterns captured from ego-centric driving perspectives or controlled aerial views. This regional and sensor view bias creates a significant gap. Models trained on datasets such as UA-DETRAC and COCO struggle to generalize to the dense, heterogeneous, disorganized traffic conditions observed in rapidly developing urban centers in emerging economies. To address this limitation, we introduce BMD-45, a large-scale dataset comprising 480K bounding boxes annotated over 45K images captured from over 3.6K operational Safe City CCTV cameras. BMD-45 contains 14 fine-grained vehicle categories, including region-specific modes such as auto-rickshaws and tempo travellers, which are not present in existing benchmarks. The dataset captures real-world deployment challenges, including extreme viewpoint variation, occlusion, and vehicle density . We establish comprehensive baselines using state-of-the-art detectors and reveal a striking domain gap: models fine-tuned on UA-DETRAC achieve only 33.6% [email protected]:0.95, compared to 83.8% when trained in-domain on BMD-45, representing a 2.5x improvement that persists even when accounting for novel vehicle classes. This performance gap underscores the critical need for geographically diverse traffic benchmarks and establishes BMD-45 as a baseline for developing robust perception systems in underrepresented urban environments worldwide. The dataset is available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/iisc-aim/BMD-45.
Akash Sharma, Chinmay Mhatre, Sankalp Gawali +8
Department of Computational and Data Sciences (CDS) Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India · Centre for Infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation & Urban Planning (CiSTUP) Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India · Center of Data for Public Good (CDPG) Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India +1