Looking Beyond the Scale: Do Surgical Skill Models Learn Transferable Representations Across Assessment Rubrics?
Authors: Hanna Hoffmann, Felix von Bechtolsheim, Stefanie Speidel, Rebecca Hisey
Organizations: Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT/UCC Dresden, a partnership between DKFZ, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany · Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden (TUD), Dresden, Germany · BMFTR Research Hub 6G-Life, Technische Universität Dresden (TUD), Dresden, Germany · Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany · Surgical Skills Lab Dresden, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany · Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany · The Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), Technische Universität Dresden (TUD), Dresden, Germany
Vision-based surgical skill assessment has shown strong in-domain results, yet a fundamental question remains unasked: do these models learn transferable representations of surgical proficiency, or do they merely encode dataset-specific visual patterns? This paper systematically analyzes what limits cross-domain skill transfer between the GOALS and OSATS assessment scales using the LASANA and JIGSAWS datasets. Each evaluated method serves a targeted diagnostic purpose: end-to-end training to test whether supervised skill learning transfers directly, Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization (ASAM) to probe whether flatter loss landscapes improve generalization, and augmentation-based self-supervised and contrastive learning to assess whether domain-invariant pretraining decouples skill from visual context. Transfer is evaluated in both directions using a disjoint-participant held-out test set for JIGSAWS. Results reveal an asymmetry: backbones pretrained on JIGSAWS achieve CCC values of 0.77 to 0.80 on LASANA, closely matching the end-to-end baseline, showing cross-rubric transfer is feasible when the target domain provides consistent supervision. Transfer to JIGSAWS fails across all methods, likely due to annotation inconsistencies. Control experiments with a Kinetics-pretrained backbone suggest task-specific heads carry the majority of the skill prediction burden, while the backbone need only provide adequate spatiotemporal features. These findings offer a new perspective on vision-based skill assessment: the central question of whether skill representations transfer across scoring systems has not been previously investigated. Results indicate the visual component is dominant but not solely responsible for skill prediction; further work is needed to conclusively disentangle transferable skill features from those bound to a specific visual domain.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the cross-domain surgical skill transfer problem and our approach. JIGSAWS (annotated with OSATS) and LASANA (annotated with GOALS) differ substantially in visual appearance and scoring rubric. This work investigates whether vision-based skill representations transfer across these domains using image normalization, ASAM pretraining, and augmentation-based self-supervised learning.
LASANA
JIGSAWS
Model
CCC
MAE
CCC
MAE
Kinetics
0.78 (0.03)
0.07 (0.007)
-
-
Supervised
0.81 (0.01) \tnote∗
0.07 (0.004) \tnote∗
0.08 (0.08)
0.16 (0.011)
ASAM
0.74 (0.04) \tnote∗
0.07 (0.004) \tnote∗
0.06 (0.04)
0.18 (0.012)
SSL
0.78 (0.06)
0.07 (0.012)
0.09 (0.09)
0.19 (0.006)
CL
0.80 (0.01)
0.07 (0.001)
0.20 (0.06)
0.16 (0.004)
Table 1: This table shows the test set results of the models pretrained on the LASANA datset. The middle and right columns show the results of the finetuned heads using the respective dataset in the column header. All values are given as the mean of three trials with the standard deviation in parentheses.
JIGSAWS
LASANA
Model
CCC
MAE
CCC
MAE
Kinetics
0.17 (0.01)
0.19 (0.06)
-
-
Supervised
-0.03 (0.08) \tnote∗
0.23 (0.012) \tnote∗
0.80 (0.01)
0.07 (0.002)
ASAM
0.22 (0.01) \tnote∗
0.18 (0.009) \tnote∗
0.79 (0.05)
0.07 (0.004)
SSL
0.22 (0.05)
0.18 (0.012)
0.79 (0.02)
0.07 (0.004)
CL
0.05 (0.02)
0.18 (0.003)
0.77 (0.04)
0.07 (0.006)
Table 2: This table shows the test set results of the models pretrained on the JIGSAWS datset. The middle and right columns show the results of the finetuned heads using the respective dataset in the column header. All values are given as the mean of three trials with the standard deviation in parentheses.
Figure 2: Distributions of the maximum normalized GRS compared to the self-proclaimed skill level based on the number of hours of experience. Boxplots are divided by quartiles; the mean is separately plotted.
Objective assessment of surgical technical skill is important for surgical training and structured feedback, but current workflows remain dependent on labor-intensive expert review. Existing automated approaches primarily focus on visual inputs and provide limited support for jointly studying operative performance, structured skill scores, and evaluator feedback. We introduce SurgSkill-Bench, an initial video-score-text benchmark-style dataset containing 214 surgical training simulation videos, six-dimensional OSATS scores, and expert free-text comments. We define two evaluation settings: video-only OSATS prediction for automated assessment and post hoc expert-comment-assisted prediction, where evaluator comments are available as auxiliary information. We provide controlled baseline experiments using representative frozen visual backbones, content-adaptive key-frame sampling, and a simple video-text co-attention fusion module. Under internal video-level validation, content-adaptive sampling improves video-only performance in this dataset, while evaluator comments provide additional score-related signal in the assisted setting. The best mean AUROC reaches 0.88 under dataset-specific median dichotomization. We further discuss evaluation constraints related to dataset scale, metadata completeness, and the interpretation of comment-assisted prediction. Code will be released publicly at a later date.
Chaohui Dang, Zheheng Jiang, James Glasbey +3
Department of Electronic, Electrical and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK · School of Computing and Mathematical Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK · Department of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK +1
Achieving high levels of surgical skill through effective training is essential for optimal patient outcomes. Automated, data-driven skill assessment holds significant potential to improve surgical training. While machine learning-based methods are increasingly popular for assessing skills in minimally invasive surgery, their application to open surgery remains limited. We present the results of a dedicated MICCAI challenge designed to benchmark and advance vision-based skill assessment in open surgery. The challenge dataset comprises videos of an open suturing training task recorded with a static GoPro camera in a dry-lab setting, with instrument trajectories available in addition to the primary video modality. The OSS Challenge was hosted over two consecutive years, comprising two and three independent tasks, respectively: (1) classifying skill level into four classes, (2) predicting the full Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills across eight categories, and (3) tracking hands and surgical tools. Participants submitted diverse solutions including deep learning-based video models, tracking-driven methods, and hybrid approaches. General-purpose spatiotemporal video models consistently achieved the strongest performance, though conceptually diverse approaches reached competitive levels when well-executed. Predicting fine-grained OSATS scores remains challenging but benefits substantially from increased training data. Keypoint tracking proves difficult given frequent occlusions and out-of-frame instances, limiting current applicability for motion-based skill analysis. This work benchmarks innovative and diverse solutions for surgical skill assessment, highlighting both the promise and current limitations of video-based evaluation in open surgery and identifying critical directions for advancing automated skill assessment toward clinical impact.
Vision-based surgical skill assessment (SSA) enables objective and scalable evaluation of operative performance. Progress in this field is constrained by the high cost and time demands for manual annotation of quantitative skill scores, as well as the poor generalization of existing regression models to new surgical tasks and environments. Meanwhile, appreciable volumes of unlabeled video data are now available, motivating the development of unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) methods for SSA. We introduce the first benchmark for UDA in SSA regression, spanning four datasets across dry-lab and clinical settings as well as open and robotic surgery. We evaluate eight representative models under challenging domain shifts and propose CoRe-DA, a novel contrastive regression-based adaptation framework. Our method learns domain-invariant representations through relative-score supervision and target-domain self-training. Comprehensive experiments across two UDA settings show that CoRe-DA is superior to state-of-the-art methods, achieving Spearman Correlation Coefficients of 0.46 and 0.41 on dry-lab and clinical target datasets, respectively, without using any labeled target data for training. Overall, CoRe-DA enables scalable SSA with reliable cross-domain generalization, where existing methods underperform. Our code and datasets will be released at https://github.com/anastadimi/CoRe-DA.
UCL Hawkes Institute, University College London, UK · Dept of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, UK · The Griffin Institute, UK +1