SpeechSense: A Paralinguistic-Focused Dataset for Fine-Grained Speech Sentiment Analysis

Emotion is essential in spoken communication, yet most existing frameworks in speech emotion modeling rely on predefined categories or low-dimensional continuous attributes, which offer limited expressive capacity. Recent advances in speech emotion captioning and synthesis have shown that textual descriptions provide a more flexible and interpretable alternative for representing affective characteristics in speech. However, progress in this direction is hindered by the lack of an emotional speech dataset aligned with reliable and fine-grained natural language annotations. To tackle this, we introduce AffectSpeech, a large-scale corpus of human-recorded speech enriched with structured descriptions for fine-grained emotion analysis and generation. Each utterance is characterized across six complementary dimensions, including sentiment polarity, open-vocabulary emotion captions, intensity level, prosodic attributes, prominent segments, and semantic content, enabling multi-granular modeling of vocal expression. To balance annotation quality and scalability, we adopt a human-LLM collaborative annotation pipeline that integrates algorithmic pre-labeling, multi-LLM description generation, and human-in-the-loop verification. Furthermore, these annotations are reformulated into diverse descriptive styles to enhance linguistic diversity and reduce stylistic bias in downstream modeling. Experimental results on speech emotion captioning and synthesis demonstrate that models trained on AffectSpeech consistently achieve superior performance across multiple evaluation settings.

Recent advances in Audio LLMs have achieved human-level speech recognition, yet existing systems struggle to capture paralinguistic aspects such as speaker traits, expressive variations, and environmental acoustic conditions. To address this, we design a framework of 22 paralinguistic characteristics and create a dataset of over 1.2M Audio-QA pairs. We develop ParA-LLM, trained with a two-stage curriculum: first on single-attribute questions to build foundational knowledge, then on multi-attribute questions for joint reasoning over speaker and acoustic characteristics. We also release ParA-Bench, a benchmark of 6,000 multiple-choice questions across speaker-speech, acoustic, and mixed categories, where frontier models like GPT-4o-Audio achieve only 36% accuracy. ParA-LLM surpasses state-of-the-art Audio LLMs like GPT-4o-Audio by 7.5% on ParA-Bench, with additional gains of 1.13% on MMAU-Pro Speech and 7.49% on MMAR Speech.

Toxic speech detection has become a crucial challenge in maintaining safe online communication environments. However, existing approaches to toxic speech detection often neglect the contribution of paralinguistic cues, such as emotion, intonation, and speech rate, which are key to detecting speech toxicity. Moreover, current toxic speech datasets are predominantly text-based, limiting the development of models that can capture paralinguistic cues.To address these challenges, we present ToxiAlert-Bench, a large-scale audio dataset comprising over 30,000 audio clips annotated with seven major toxic categories and twenty fine-grained toxic labels. Uniquely, our dataset annotates toxicity sources -- distinguishing between textual content and paralinguistic origins -- for comprehensive toxic speech analysis.Furthermore, we propose a dual-head neural network with a multi-stage training strategy tailored for toxic speech detection. This architecture features two task-specific classification headers: one for identifying the source of sensitivity (textual or paralinguistic), and the other for categorizing the specific toxic type. The training process involves independent head training followed by joint fine-tuning to reduce task interference. To mitigate data class imbalance, we incorporate class-balanced sampling and weighted loss functions.Our experimental results show that leveraging paralinguistic features significantly improves detection performance. Our method consistently outperforms existing baselines across multiple evaluation metrics, with a 21.1% relative improvement in Macro-F1 score and a 13.0% relative gain in accuracy over the strongest baseline, highlighting its enhanced effectiveness and practical applicability.