SpeechSense: A Paralinguistic-Focused Dataset for Fine-Grained Speech Sentiment Analysis
Organizations: Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Abstract
Recent advances in AI have revolutionized speech processing, yet effective speech understanding requires discerning not just what is said, but how it is said. Speech Sentiment Analysis plays a critical role in decoding these paralinguistic cues for diverse real-world applications such as recruitment and customer service. However, existing Speech Sentiment Analysis research faces two primary limitations. First, dominant approaches rely on text-centric pipelines that cascade Automatic Speech Recognition with text analysis. This process inevitably discards essential acoustic features like prosody and tone, failing to capture attitudinal meanings in acoustically ambiguous utterances. Second, current benchmarks suffer from a mismatch in label granularity, prioritizing basic emotions (e.g., happy, sad) over the nuanced interpersonal stances (e.g., confident, impatient) necessary for social sensitivity. To address these limitations, we propose a novel dataset, SpeechSense, for fine-grained speech sentiment analysis. Specifically, we define a specialized 8-class taxonomy of interpersonal stances detectable primarily through prosodic cues beyond lexical content alone. We then construct a curated dataset based on this taxonomy, built from high-fidelity speech synthesis and rigorous human validation. Comprehensive experiments across multi-modal LLMs, text-only LLMs, and speech encoders demonstrate that models with acoustic access consistently outperform text-only baselines. These results empirically validate the primacy of acoustic cues in detecting subtle speaker attitudes, highlighting the necessity of SpeechSense. Dataset and supplementary materials are available at https://github.com/Sher13cked/SpeechSense.
Figures & tables
| Attribute Group | Label | Acoustic & Psychological Definition |
| Internal Certainty (State of Mind) | Confident | Signals dominance and assurance. Acoustically characterized by shorter duration, higher intensity, and decisive falling pitch contours ( Pon-Barry, 2008 ) . |
| Nervous | Signals anxiety and instability. Manifests through pitch jitter (micro-tremors), higher average pitch, and irregular rhythm ( Laukka et al., 2008 ) . | |
| High-Energy Valence (Positive vs. Negative) | Passionate | Reflects intense positive engagement (Enthusiasm). Distinguished by an expanded pitch range and dynamic contours ( Frick, 1985 ) . |
| Impatient | Reflects irritation or time-pressure (Urgency). Distinguished from Passionate by clipped diction, abrupt stops, and a rigid, staccato rhythm ( Frick, 1985 ) . | |
| Social Connection (Engagement Level) | Warm | Facilitates rapport and empathy. Defined by specific vocal qualities such as a softer timbre, breathy voice quality, and steady pitch stability ( Soma et al., 2023 ) . |
| Apathetic | Reflects detachment and lack of interest. Marked by reduced prosodic variability (monotone), prolonged pauses, and a slower speech rate ( König et al., 2019 ) . |
| Metric | Value |
| Annotator Recruitment | |
| Platform | Prolific |
| Eligible candidate pool | 23,006 (from 150,000+) |
| Screening: Language | Native English |
| Screening: Education | Bachelor’s+ |
| Screening: Approval rate | 99% |
| Dataset | Source | Val. Method | Clips | Spkrs |
| Training Set | Gemini 3 Pro | Weakly-Sup. | 1,522 | 30 |
| Test Set | Qwen3-Max | Human-Val. | 669 | 30 |
| Speaker Diversity (shared control utterance, 30 profiles) | ||||
| Gender balance | 16 M / 14 F | |||
| Mean F0 range | 190.6–315.8 Hz (std = 41.7) | |||
| Formant F1 / F2 (std) | 58.3 / 94.2 Hz | |||
| Dataset | Conf. | Nerv. | Warm | Apat. | Pass. | Impat. | Sarc. | Neut. | Avg. |
| Training Set ( ) | 5.00% | 2.32% | 0.18% | 9.31% | 1.15% | 6.18% | 8.57% | 9.98% | 5.42% |
| Test Set ( ) | 2.90% | 1.43% | 3.88% | 1.38% | 7.20% | 1.27% | 7.98% | 3.26% | 3.70% |
| Model | Modality | Zero-shot | Supervised (Ours) | ||
| Acc | Macro F1 | Acc | Macro F1 | ||
| Multi-modal LLMs | |||||
| Qwen2.5-Omni-3B | Text | 8.22% | 3.79% | 25.26% | 19.71% |
| Qwen2.5-Omni-3B | Audio | 3.74% | 1.31% | 54.86% | 53.38% |
| Qwen2.5-Omni-7B | Text | 11.36% | 6.20% | 26.76% | 22.27% |
| Qwen2.5-Omni-7B | Audio | 11.96% | 2.96% | 56.95 % | 56.76% |
Sentiment Analysis
Sentiment analysis detects and measures opinions, emotions, and evaluative stance in text and multimodal data.
See all 127 papers