JSL-DC: A Word-Level Japanese Sign Language Dataset with Linguist-Derived Descriptions for Distinguishing Confusable Signs
Authors: Ken Takaki, Asuka Ando, Misa Suzuki, Uiko Yano, Masaya Tsujimoto, Bill Neubauer, Ananay Vikram Gupta, Rose Shao, +7 more
Organizations: The University of Tokyo · Independent · Kwansei Gakuin University · Georgia Institute of Technology · Keio University · Technical University of Clausthal
Effective sign language (SL) acquisition is crucial for deaf children, yet 95% are born to hearing parents who often lack proficiency in SL. SL recognition can power learning tools to help parents communicate with their children. However, Japanese Sign Language (JSL) lacks large-scale, multi-signer datasets, hindering the development of models that can generalize to new users. To address this gap, we introduce JSL-DC, the largest JSL dataset by video count, comprising 36.7K videos from 19 signers. The entire process was Deaf-centric: the lexicon comprising 270 JSL words was selected by Deaf and Coda linguists to facilitate parent-child communication, all participants were Deaf individuals who use JSL daily, and the data underwent a two-stage review process involving Deaf linguists. Moreover, we provide linguist-derived descriptions for distinguishing confusable signs. We demonstrate that the proposed model inspired by the descriptions outperforms state-of-the-art recognition methods by 9.8% on the confusable subset. The dataset, along with its linguistic description that inspires new models, will be released under a CC-BY 4.0 license to accelerate research in SL recognition.
Figures & tables
Dataset
Country
Signs
Signers
Videos
Ave. Videos/Sign
Source
Distinguish Note
Purdue RVL-SLLL [ 32 ]
USA
39
14
2.6K
67
Studio
RWTH-BOSTON 50 [ 56 ]
USA
50
3
0.5K
10
Studio
ASLLVD [ 4 ]
USA
3,000
6
9.8K
3
Studio
WLASL [ 31 ]
USA
2,000
119
21.1K
11
Web
MS-ASL [ 27 ]
USA
1,000
222
25.5K
26
Web
ASL Citizen [ 12 ]
USA
2,731
52
83.9K
31
Webcam
Table 1: Comparison of existing ISLR datasets. Distinguish Note is a description by a Deaf linguist for distinguishing confusable signs.
Figure 1: Overview of our Deaf-centric process of data collection involving deaf participants. Deaf authors D1, D2, and the Coda author C led the process.
Figure 2: Sample reference videos used in the data collection. (a) is “scary” (怖い, kowai ), and (b) is “cold” (寒い, samui ), with the same body movement but different mouth movements.)
Figure 3: Screenshot of the JSL recorder tablet application. The participant swipes to the left after finish signing each example.)
Figure 4: Frequently confused examples. (a) is “bitter (taste)” (苦い, nigai ), and was misclassified as “spicy” (辛い, karai ), which is (b). They could be classified by the mouth movements.
All (270 glosses)
Confusable (22 glosses)
Others (248 glosses)
Method
input
MACs (G)
Top-1
F1
Top-1
F1
Top-1
F1
SPOTER [ 6 ]
keypoint
0.38
78.7
78.5
51.7
50.9
81.1
80.9
PopSign ASL v2.0 [ 38 ]
keypoint
1.6
81.9
81.4
55.3
50.1
84.3
84.2
MASA [ 57 ]
keypoint
3.9
82.8
83.0
54.8
51.1
85.3
85.8
NLA-SLR [ 59 ]
keypoint
55.7
91.6
91.9
61.2
58.1
94.3
94.9
NLA-SLR + mouthing (ours)
keypoint
58.0
92.2
92.5
68.3
65.4
94.3
94.9
Table 2: Results across confusable vs. other glosses.
Figure 5: The proposed mouthing-based reranker to classify the confusable sets.
Gloss
Δ Top-1
Δ F1
Thank you for the meal. (s0006_itatakimasu)
−19.0
−3.5
Thank you for the meal. (s0033_kochisousamateshita)
+31.2
+38.5
scared (s0034_kowai_Bu_i_)
+37.5
+33.8
cold (s0036_samui_Han_i_)
+10.0
+15.5
cold (s0057_tsumetai_Leng_tai_)
+44.4
+43.9
spicy (s0024_karai_Xin_i_)
0.0
+0.8
Table 3: Change in Top-1 accuracy and F1 (percentage points) after the mouthing rerank, for confusable pairs distinguished mainly by mouthing/mouth cues.
Figure 6: A screenshot of the playable version of PopSign JSL, where (a) the user is signing “warm” (暖かい, atatakai ) and hand landmarks are recognized by MediaPipe (only the left hand is visualized). The landmarks are fed into a Bi-LSTM model trained with our dataset. (b) The bubble labeled with the recognition result is released.
Isolated Sign Language Recognition (ISLR) is conventionally cast as closed-set classification over gloss labels, which cannot generalize to signs unseen in training and ties every deployment to a gloss-annotated lexicon. We instead recognize signs extracted from continuous signing by (1) captioning a sign-level clip into a free-form procedural description of the articulation with an open-weight vision-language model, and (2) retrieving the closest entry from a vocabulary of target descriptions with a multilingual sentence encoder: a reverse sign language dictionary that needs no gloss supervision and admits an open vocabulary. On 1,300 sign-level segments from a Japanese Sign Language (JSL) dialogue corpus annotated with procedural descriptions (against a 2% top-10 chance floor over the 503-entry target vocabulary), fine-tuning the captioner substantially improves seen-class retrieval: language and vision tower fine-tuning raises top-10 retrieval on seen classes from 4.5% (untrained) to 49%, becoming statistically indistinguishable from a standard supervised closed-set classifier (I3D) on two of the three test sets where a closed-set classifier can be evaluated at all. More importantly, unseen-class retrieval also improves significantly over the untrained pipeline (11.5% -> 21.0% top-10, p=0.0094), a regime in which the closed-set classifier cannot participate. A matcher-side empirical upper-bound analysis shows the sentence encoder already recovers close to 100% of paraphrased gold descriptions, locating a gap in captioning quality that we aim to address in future work. To our knowledge this is the first description-based, open-vocabulary sign lookup from continuous signing without gloss supervision, and the first for JSL.
Santiago Poveda-Gutiérrez, Hideki Nakayama, Mayumi Bono
Grad. School of IST The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan · Information and Society Research Division National Institute of Informatics Tokyo, Japan
Recognition of signers' emotions suffers from one theoretical challenge and one practical challenge, namely, the overlap between grammatical and affective facial expressions and the scarcity of data for model training. This paper addresses these two challenges in a cross-lingual setting using our eJSL dataset, a new benchmark dataset for emotion recognition in Japanese Sign Language signers, and BOBSL, a large British Sign Language dataset with subtitles. In eJSL, two signers expressed 78 distinct utterances with each of seven different emotional states, resulting in 1,092 video clips. We empirically demonstrate that 1) textual emotion recognition in spoken language mitigates data scarcity in sign language, 2) temporal segment selection has a significant impact, and 3) incorporating hand motion enhances emotion recognition in signers. Finally we establish a stronger baseline than spoken language LLMs.
Kotaro Funakoshi, Yaoxiong Zhu
FIRST, Institute of Integrated Research · Institute of Science Tokyo · ICT, School of Engineering
Sign languages are expressive visual languages used by Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) communities. Despite substantial progress in sign-language recognition, translation, and production, advances remain constrained by fragmented datasets, inconsistent annotations, and limited linguistic coverage. Existing benchmarks often fail to reflect real-world communication needs, and systematic analyses of these limitations remain limited. In this survey, we present a comprehensive index of sign-language datasets, covering 120 resources across 35 sign languages. We analyze key challenges such as modality imbalance, annotation granularity, and signer bias, and outline considerations for future dataset design. We also introduce a 24-field Sign-Language Datasheet and release a public GitHub repository (https://github.com/Ginqwerty/Open-Sign-Language) to support standardized documentation and reproducible evaluation. Overall, our work provides a unified and practical foundation for developing inclusive, robust, and scalable sign-language technologies in real-world applications.
Yiming Ni, Zhi-Qi Cheng, Jiayu Li +1
Tacoma School of Engineering & Technology, University of Washington