On the Slow Convergence to Trivial Solutions of Algorithms for Hard Optimization Problems

The conclusions of an experimental study of algorithms are only as good as the instances they are run on. Benchmark libraries for well-studied problems took decades to curate, while evaluations of new problems often fall back on random instances, which are known to be misleading: they may say more about the random generator than about the algorithmic question at hand. We treat instance generation as an optimization problem: parameterize the instance space, take the solver's running time as the objective, and let a black-box optimizer search for hard instances. We develop a widely applicable workflow built on the Nevergrad optimization platform and demonstrate it on four NP-hard problems: satisfiability, traveling salesperson, Hamiltonian cycle, and non-permutation flow-shop scheduling. The search needs only the solver, an instance encoder, and a compute budget. Our evolved instances beat the hardest instance of a budget-matched random draw in all four case studies, by an order of magnitude or more in three. They are often competitive with long-curated benchmark sets: our SAT champion is harder (for a three-solver portfolio) than 78% of the 498 SAT Competition formulas in its size class; our 20-city TSP champions take several times longer than the hardest measured classical TSPLIB instance (229 cities); and our flow-shop champion takes 238.6 seconds of CP Optimizer time to solve to proven optimality (versus 4.5 seconds for the hardest of 100,000 random draws) while denying CP-SAT an optimality proof. The optimizer even recovers known structure from running time alone: it locates a SAT clause/variable ratio near the phase transition and finds structurally different champions for the two scheduling engines.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are increasingly applied to hard optimization problems, often claiming superiority over classical heuristics. However, such claims risk being unsolid due to a lack of standard benchmarks on truly hard instances. From a statistical physics perspective, we propose new hard benchmarks based on random problems. We provide these benchmarks, along with performance results from both classical heuristics and GNNs. Our fair comparison shows that classical algorithms still outperform GNNs. We discuss the challenges for neural networks in this domain. Future claims of superiority can be made more robust using our benchmarks, available at https://github.com/ArtLabBocconi/RandCSPBench.

Optimization problems such as the NP-complete 3-SAT provide an important benchmark for the difficult task of finding ground-states in strongly correlated many-body systems with rugged energy landscapes. The study of random 3-SAT problems as Ising spin Hamiltonians in statistical physics has yielded major insights including the existence of a satisfiability phase transition, and the prediction of a critical parameter line of particularly hard instances. Yet, progress on solving those instances has been scarce for several decades. Here, introducing the Target-SAT (TSAT) algorithm, we roughly triple the tractable problem sizes in the hardest regime, with an even greater improvement in a vast range of neighboring regions. By leveraging statistical information hidden in the combinatorial constraints of the problem, TSAT is actively guided in its stochastic local search toward a target within the relevant parameter space. Our analysis also explains why established local search algorithms are limited to relatively small system sizes due to a vast low-energy trap. Furthermore, we characterize the aforementioned critical line in terms of a dominant additional complexity barrier, whose exponential scaling is quickly overcome by TSAT only in the surrounding parameter space. With TSAT, the lead in solving the hardest known random satisfiability problems returns to the realm of stochastic local search algorithms.