QUASAR: A Quantum-Classical Neural Network for SAR Satellite Physical-Layer Authentication
Organizations: University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
X-band SAR satellites (8-12 GHz) play a critical role in disaster response, environmental monitoring, and military intelligence. Yet, they lack robust physical-layer authentication (PLA), a security layer orthogonal to cryptographic solutions. Existing PLA systems, typically based on radio-frequency fingerprinting, are often limited to sub-6 GHz frequencies and rely on classical deep learning. However, this approach underfits the IQ phase nonlinearities that distinguish satellite hardware. In this paper, we present QUASAR, to the best of our knowledge the first quantum-classical hybrid architecture that fuses a CNN spectrogram encoder with a variational quantum circuit (VQC) to provide PLA to X-band SAR signals. Our solution enjoys two distinctive features: (i) it is markedly more data-efficient than classical machine learning, requiring only 10% of the training data to match the accuracy of classical baselines -- data collection being notoriously the most time-consuming phase of PLA; and, (ii) at an equal data budget, it improves classification accuracy over those baselines. In detail, we test our solution under three adversarial scenarios: replay, crafted-IQ injection, and space-borne spoofing. QUASAR rejects spoofed transmissions in 89.7%, 94.1%, and 81.3% of attempts, respectively, establishing the first quantum-enhanced physical-layer classifier for satellite constellations. The fully detailed framework and the supporting results, other than being interesting on their own, show a novel research avenue for physical-layer authentication.
Figures & tables
| Angle embedding | IQ-native (ours) | |||
| Metric | Validation | Test | Validation | Test |
| Accuracy | 0.950 ( 0.010) | 0.947 ( 0.009) | 0.973 ( 0.010) | 0.969 ( 0.009) |
| Macro-F1 | 0.950 ( 0.004) | 0.947 ( 0.005) | 0.973 ( 0.004) | 0.969 ( 0.005) |
| Precision (target) | 0.953 | 0.951 | 0.969 | 0.965 |
| Recall (target) | 0.948 | 0.943 | 0.974 | 0.975 |
| Convergence epoch | 68 | — | 37 | — |
| Model | Accuracy | Macro-F1 |
| Ablation variants | ||
| QNN-Only (PCA + VQC) | 0.713 | 0.709 |
| CNN-Only (no VQC) | 0.894 | 0.891 |
| QuaSAR (angle embedding) | 0.947 | 0.947 |
| Classical spectrogram baselines | ||
| Spectrogram ResNet | 0.854 | 0.861 |
| Satellite | Acc | Prec | Rec | F1 |
| X4 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| X20 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.88 |
| X41 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.97 |
| Mean | 0.91 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
| Model | Silhouette | Calinski–Harabasz | Davies–Bouldin |
| CNN-Only | 0.3106 | 61.69 | 1.2219 |
| QuaSAR | 0.3775 | 64.18 | 1.0341 |
| (rel.) |
| Method | Target signal & band | Data (real / sim, scale) | Architecture | Reported metric / performance | Main contribution |
| Classical RF fingerprinting — sub-6 GHz satellites | |||||
| PAST-AI [ 8 ] | IRIDIUM, L-band | Real, 589 h / 66 sats | CNN + Autoencoder | Authentication accuracy: 80–100% (scenario/assumption dependent) | First deep-learning satellite RFFI |
| SatIQ [ 9 ] | IRIDIUM, L-band | Real, 10.29 M msgs | Siamese + autoencoder | EER: 0.072 ROC AUC: 0.960 | High-rate IQ raises spoofing cost |
| FadePrint [ 33 ] | IRIDIUM, L-band (channel) | Real satellite + terrestrial captures | Fading-process classifier | Spoofing-detection accuracy: 99% (satellite vs. indoor terrestrial) | Channel fading as fingerprint |
| ORBID [ 34 ] | ORBCOMM, VHF | Real, 8.99 M packets | CNN + triplet loss | ROC AUC: 0.53 (satellite ID) ROC AUC: 0.98 (satellite vs. SDR) | Modulation-dependent ID limits |
| Classical RF fingerprinting — above 6 GHz | |||||
Wireless Communications
Wireless communications studies how information is sent over radio links and how networks manage signals, spectrum, and resources reliably.
See all 391 papers