A Collaborative Multi-Modality Interaction for VLA-based End-to-End Autonomous Driving
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for end-to-end autonomous driving by jointly integrating perception, reasoning, and decision making within a unified multimodal framework. However, most existing VLA models formulate end-to-end autonomous driving as a visual question answering task, leading to unreliable and less interpretable decision reasoning. In addition, they fail to establish effective multi-modal interaction across heterogeneous sensors, thereby limiting robust scene perception and reliable driving reasoning in long-tail driving scenarios. To this end, we propose a robust VLA-based end-to-end autonomous driving system that combines multi-modality interaction with multi-trajectory planning and optimization, enabling more reliable, interpretable, and safer driving decisions. Our method comprises three core components: (1) Affinity-Guided Optimal Transport for main-auxiliary modality two-way interaction; (2) Distribution-Consistent Modality Transfer for heterogeneous modality distribution transfer and cross-modal interaction; (3) Multi-modal Multi-Trajectory Planning along with Perception-Oriented Trajectory Refinement for better driving decisions to long-tail driving scenarios. Experimental results in open-loop and closed-loop datasets demonstrate improvements in safety long-horizon driving reasoning and road scene perception over existing driving systems, highlighting the ability of our mutli-modality interaction and multi-trajectory planning and optimization for scalable VLA-based systems.
Figures & tables
| Method | Paradigm | Backbone | Input | NC | DAC | TTC | Comf. | EP | PDMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional End-to-End Manner | |||||||||
| Transfuser [ 17 ] [TPAMI2022] | - | - | 3×Cam + LiDAR | 97.7 | 92.8 | 92.8 | 100 | 79.2 | 84.0 |
| GoalFlow [ 72 ] [CVPR2025] | - | - | 3×Cam + LiDAR | 98.4 | 98.3 | 94.6 | 100 | 85.0 | 90.3 |
| VADv2 [ 34 ] [ICLR2024] | - | - | 6×Cam | 97.2 | 89.1 | 91.6 | 100 | 76.0 | 80.9 |
| DiffusionDrive [ 37 ] [CVPR2025] | Diff. | - | 3×Cam + LiDAR | 98.2 | 96.0 | 94.8 | 100 | 82.2 | 88.1 |
| Artemis [ 47 ] [RAL2025] | Diff. | - | 6×Cam | 98.3 | 95.1 | 94.3 | 99.8 | 81.4 | 87.0 |
| Method | Input | NC | DAC | EP | TTC | DDC | LK | EC | EPDMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VADv2 [ 34 ] [ICLR2024] | Camera | 97.3 | 91.7 | 77.6 | 92.7 | 98.2 | 66.0 | 97.4 | 76.6 |
| TransFuser [ 17 ] [TPAMI2022] | Camera & LiDAR | 97.7 | 92.8 | 79.2 | 92.8 | 98.3 | 67.6 | 95.3 | 77.8 |
| DiffusionDrive [ 37 ] [CVPR2025] | Camera & LiDAR | 98.2 | 96.2 | 87.6 | 97.3 | 98.6 | 97.0 | 98.4 | 84.0 |
| GaussianFusion [ 73 ] [NeurIPS2026] | Camera & LiDAR | 98.3 | 97.3 | 87.5 | 97.4 | 99.0 | 97.4 | 98.3 | 85.0 |
| Ours | Camera & LiDAR | 99.0 | 98.5 | 88.6 | 98.3 | 99.0 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 87.0 |
| Method | Input Modality | Core Metrics | Subdivision Infraction Score | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS | RC | IS | SR | CP | CV | CL | RL | SS | OR | AB | YEV | ||
| Traditional End-to-End Manner | |||||||||||||
| TransFuser [ 17 ] [TPAMI2022] | Camera & LiDAR | 37.18 | 68.14 | 0.51 | 9.09 | 0.96 | 13.24 | 8.71 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.32 | 2.58 | 0.32 |
| ThinkTwice [ 24 ] [CVPR2023] | Camera & LiDAR | 58.79 | 74.35 | 0.77 | 29.54 | 0.30 | 5.76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.05 | 0.91 | 0.30 |
| TCP [ 27 ] [NeurIPS2022] | Camera | 56.28 | 83.57 | 0.65 | 25.00 | 0.26 | 5.46 | 5.46 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.22 | 0.78 | 0.00 |
| NEAT [ 75 ] [ICCV2021] | Camera | 30.86 | 55.35 | 0.55 | 6.81 | 1.08 | 9.87 | 5.57 | 0.20 | 1.33 | 0.41 | 2.01 | 0.27 |
| Method | Ego Status | L2 (m) | Collision (%) | Intersection (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEV | Planner | 1s | 2s | 3s | Avg. | 1s | 2s | 3s | Avg. | 1s | 2s | 3s | Avg. | |
| Traditional Modular End-to-End Paradigm | ||||||||||||||
| UniAD [ 30 ] [CVPR2023] | ✓ | ✓ | 0.20 | 0.42 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.84 | 0.37 | 0.20 | 1.33 | 3.24 | 1.59 |
| VAD-Base [ 31 ] [ICCV2023] | ✓ | ✓ | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.60 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 2.13 | 5.06 | 2.47 |
| BEV-Planner [ 33 ] [CVPR2024] | ✓ | ✓ | 0.16 | 0.32 | 0.57 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.73 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 2.62 | 6.51 | 3.16 |
| UAD [ 77 ] [TPAMI2025] | ✓ | ✓ | 0.13 | 0.28 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.13 | 1.08 | 2.89 | 1.37 |
| Method | Modality | validation | test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mAP | NDS | mAP | NDS | ||
| CenterPoint [ 80 ] | L | 59.6 | 66.8 | 60.3 | 67.3 |
| GeoFormer [ 81 ] | L+C | 68.2 | 72.4 | 69.8 | 73.7 |
| TransFusion [ 82 ] | L+C | 67.5 | 71.3 | 68.9 | 71.6 |
| BEVFusion [ 64 ] | L+C | 67.9 | 71.0 | 69.2 | 71.8 |
| BEVFormer [ 25 ] | L+C | 71.2 | 73.2 | 72.9 | 74.1 |
| Method | mAP | Veh. | Bus | Ped. | Truck | Bicyclist |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CenterPoint [ 80 ] [CVPR2021] | 22.0 | 67.6 | 38.9 | 46.5 | 22.1 | 20.1 |
| VoxelNeXt [ 83 ] [CVPR2023] | 30.7 | 72.7 | 38.8 | 63.2 | 16.9 | 32.4 |
| HEDNet [ 84 ] [NeurIPS2023] | 37.1 | 78.2 | 47.7 | 67.6 | 21.6 | 38.7 |
| FSDv2 [ 85 ] [TPAMI2024] | 37.6 | 77.0 | 47.6 | 70.5 | 24.0 | 45.9 |
| SAFDNet [ 86 ] [CVPR2024] | 39.7 | 78.5 | 49.4 | 70.7 | 23.6 | 42.7 |
| GeoFormer [ 81 ] [ICCV2025] | 41.7 | 77.4 | 50.7 | 73.7 | 24.6 | 48.0 |
| Method | PointPillars [ 21 ] | CenterPoint [ 80 ] | MVP [ 87 ] | BEVFusion [ 64 ] | Ours |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modality | L | L | C+L | C+L | C+L |
| Drivable | 72.0 | 75.6 | 76.1 | 85.5 | 88.2 |
| Ped.Cross. | 43.1 | 48.4 | 48.7 | 60.5 | 73.4 |
| Walkway | 53.1 | 57.5 | 57.0 | 67.6 | 82.1 |
| Stop Line | 29.7 | 36.5 | 36.9 | 52.0 | 60.9 |
| Carpark | 27.7 | 31.7 | 33.0 | 57.0 | 62.4 |
| Method | Simple-BEV [ 89 ] | BEVFusion [ 64 ] | CMGFA [ 88 ] | Ours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drivable | 72.3 | 80.8 | 85.9 | 87.5 |
| Bicycle | 50.1 | 56.0 | 60.8 | 63.8 |
| Vehicle | 53.2 | 63.2 | 69.3 | 70.7 |
| Stop sign | 42.3 | 52.2 | 56.8 | 55.1 |
| Pedestrain | 45.1 | 51.2 | 55.2 | 59.4 |
| Bollard | 42.1 | 48.3 | 52.1 | 46.5 |
| Planning Loss | Evaluation Metrics | |||||||
| NC | DAC | TTC | Comf. | EP | PDMS | |||
| ✓ | 99.0 | 97.0 | 97.6 | 100 | 85.0 | 86.9 | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | 99.0 | 97.2 | 97.8 | 100 | 85.4 | 87.5 | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 99.0 | 98.5 | 98.3 | 100 | 88.6 | 92.2 |
| VLA Backbone | Evaluation Metrics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | DAC | TTC | Comf. | EP | PDMS | |
| Qwen2.5-3B | 98.9 | 98.4 | 98.0 | 99.9 | 88.5 | 91.8 |
| LLaVA-7B | 99.2 | 98.3 | 98.2 | 100 | 88.4 | 92.1 |
| Janus-1.5B | 99.0 | 98.5 | 98.3 | 100 | 88.6 | 92.2 |
| Optimization Objectives | Evaluation Metrics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prior | DRCM | SRCM | Smooth | NC | DAC | TTC | Comf. | EP | PDMS |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 99.0 | 98.5 | 98.3 | 100 | 88.6 | 92.2 |
| ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 97.3 | 96.9 | 96.2 | 100 | 87.8 | 88.0 |
| ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | 96.1 | 95.7 | 94.9 | 99.7 | 87.2 | 85.1 |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | 96.7 | 96.0 | 95.4 | 98.9 | 86.4 | 85.6 |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | 98.9 | 98.5 | 98.3 | 97.6 | 88.0 | 91.5 |
| Interactive Manner | nuScenes Dataset | NAVSIM Dataset | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mAP | NDS | mIoU | PDMS | EPDMS | |
| BEVFusion | 69.2 | 71.8 | 62.7 | 90.3 | 85.7 |
| LiDAR-only counterpart | 70.7 | 75.9 | 68.0 | 91.0 | 86.4 |
| w/o DCMT | 73.6 | 77.7 | 71.0 | 92.0 | 86.9 |
| w/o prompts interaction | 73.9 | 77.9 | 71.1 | 90.1 | 86.0 |
| Ours | 74.0 | 78.0 | 71.1 | 92.2 | 87.0 |
| AGOT | DCMT | nuScenes Dataset | NAVSIM Dataset | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mAP | NDS | mIoU | PDMS | EPDMS | ||||
| ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | 72.0 | 75.4 | 68.6 | 91.0 | 85.8 |
| ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 71.3 | 76.0 | 67.5 | 91.1 | 86.0 |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | 73.0 | 77.5 | 70.7 | 91.8 | 86.7 |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | 73.2 | 77.7 | 70.9 | 91.7 | 86.4 |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 74.0 | 78.0 | 71.1 | 92.2 | 87.0 |