Organizations: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ultra High Definition Immersive Media Technology, Shenzhen Graduate School Peking University Shenzhen, China
Video multimodal large language models have advanced significantly, yet fine-grained motion-temporal understanding remains fragile. The core bottleneck is not only sparse frame sampling, but also the lack of a complete temporal modeling pipeline for explicitly representing frame-to-frame change, enabling appearance-motion interaction, and optimizing temporal direction sensitivity. We propose COMET, a temporally grounded framework that systematically strengthens video MLLMs through explicit temporal representation, appearance-motion fusion, and direction-aware optimization. Architecturally, COMET introduces a temporal motion branch built on Taylor frame differences and injects its motion evidence into the appearance stream via temporal attention bias-enhanced cross-attention. For optimization, COMET combines temporal prior distillation with a forward-reverse TC-GRPO stage that turns temporal order into a direct learning signal and strengthens the model's use of directional motion patterns encoded by the temporal motion branch. The method achieves consistent overall improvements with a pronounced motion-temporal bias: on Qwen3-VL-8B, action-centric tasks (STAR, SSv2) improve by 4.9% on average, temporal reasoning tasks (NExT-QA, CLEVRER, LLaVA-178K) by 2.1% over BL-GRPO, while static perception tasks (PerceptionTest) remain on par. The same gain pattern also transfers to InternVL2.5-8B, indicating that COMET generalizes across model families.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. Frame-independent encoding versus explicit temporal representation. (a) sparse RGB frames leave motion implicit. (b) frame-to-frame change makes temporal evidence explicit. A comparison between frame-independent video encoding and an explicit representation of frame-to-frame temporal changes.
Figure 2. Overview of COMET instantiated on Qwen3-VL-2B. (a) dual-branch architecture with DeepStack fusion. (b) TAB-enhanced gated cross-attention. An overview of the COMET framework, including its dual-branch visual encoder, multi-level fusion, and motion-aware cross-attention module.
Figure 3. Temporal-specialized training pipeline with TPD and TC-GRPO. An overview of the two-stage training pipeline, consisting of temporal prior distillation and temporal contrast GRPO.
Figure 4. Taylor-style motion maps preserve temporal direction: reversing the video flips motion direction while largely preserving appearance. A qualitative comparison of forward and reversed videos showing the directional information captured by Taylor-style motion maps.
Figure 5. Radar plot of Table 1 . Colors denote Action , Reasoning , and Perception . A radar chart comparing model performance across action, reasoning, and perception task categories.
Method
Stage
STAR
PercepTest
NExT-QA
CLEVRER
LLaVA-178K
SSv2
Action
Reasoning
Perception
Avg
Qwen3-VL-2B
Pretrained
0
60.7
60.3
78.8
59.9
69.8
55.8
58.3
69.5
60.3
64.2
BL-SFT
I
66.2
64.1
80.8
64.1
73.3
61.8
64.0
72.7
64.1
68.4
Ours-TPD
I
70.7
63.8
82.1
66.9
75.4
67.1
68.9
74.8
63.8
71.0
BL-GRPO
II
69.0
66.4
82.2
67.4
75.1
64.8
66.9
74.9
66.4
70.8
Flow4Agent (SAMFlow) † ( Liu et al., 2025 )
X
70.9
66.8
82.7
68.7
75.9
66.9
68.9
75.8
66.8
72.0
Table 1. Main results on six benchmarks and subsets. Stage 0: pretrained; I: SFT/TPD; II: GRPO/TC-GRPO; X: external baselines. † Reproduced under our setup. Best in bold , second-best underlined . Action =avg(STAR, SSv2), Reasoning =avg(NExT-QA, CLEVRER, LLaVA-178K), Perception =PercepTest.
Configuration
STAR
PT
NQA
CLV
LLaVA
SSv2
Avg
Δ
Baseline (BL-SFT)
75.5
68.0
85.4
71.0
78.5
68.8
74.5
—
COMET w/o TAB
78.4
67.7
86.1
72.8
79.6
72.1
76.1
+1.6
Full COMET
79.0
67.6
86.3
73.2
79.9
72.8
76.5
+0.4
Table 2. Component ablation of COMET (Qwen3-VL-8B, Stage I). Δ denotes the gain over the previous row.
Figure 6. Fusion gate dynamics during Stage I. (a) Gate opening tanh(αl) by level. (b) Injection ratio relative to ViT-A features. Two plots showing the evolution of fusion gates and motion-injection ratios during Stage I training.
Components
Qwen3-VL-8B
InternVL2.5-8B
Ours
Taylor ViT-B
+143.3 M (+1.6 %)
+100.7 M (+1.2 %)
Fusion modules
+37.8 M × 4 (+1.7 %)
+28.3 M × 1 (+0.4 %)
Flow
SAMFlow ( Zhou et al., 2024 )
+650 M (+7.4 %)
+650 M (+8.0 %)
MegaFlow ( Zhang et al., 2026 )
+936 M (+10.7 %)
+936 M (+11.6 %)
Table 3. Parameter overhead on 8B-scale backbones. Ours : Taylor ViT-B core attention parameters and fusion modules. Flow : external optical-flow estimators.
Optimization
STAR
PT
NQA
CLV
LLaVA
SSv2
Avg
Δ
Ours-TPD (Stage I)
79.0
67.6
86.3
73.2
79.9
72.8
76.5
—
Std. GRPO (7+0)
80.6
69.0
87.0
75.5
81.2
74.7
78.0
+1.5
TC-GRPO (6+1)
81.9
69.3
87.6
76.3
81.7
76.2
78.8
+2.3
TC-GRPO (5+2)
81.3
69.1
87.3
75.9
81.5
75.3
78.4
+1.9
TC-GRPO (4+3)
80.5
68.5
86.7
75.0
80.8
74.1
77.6
+1.1
Table 4. Optimization ablation on COMET (Qwen3-VL-8B; group size = 7). All variants start from the same Stage I checkpoint. Δ denotes the gain over Ours-TPD.
Figure 7. Forward vs. reversed accuracy during TC-GRPO training (Qwen3-VL-8B). A line chart showing forward-video and reversed-video accuracy during TC-GRPO training.
Video understanding develops methods for recognizing actions, tracking events, grounding evidence in time, and reasoning across visual and audio streams.
Motion-centric video reasoning is fundamental to interactive applications such as robotic manipulation and autonomous navigation. However, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) typically process videos through sparse uniform sampling to control visual-token and attention costs. This strategy may discard critical transitions between sampled frames, limiting reasoning about object movement, collisions, and causal interactions. To mitigate this issue, we propose Motion-as-Prompt (MaP), a track-guided cross-frame visual prompting framework. MaP recovers dense point trajectories, selects motion-informative frames, and marks the trajectories accumulated between consecutive sampled frames directly onto the visual inputs, making otherwise hidden displacement, direction changes, and interactions observable to frozen MLLMs. Experiments on CLEVRER and Something-Something-v2 show that MaP consistently improves average motion-reasoning accuracy, yielding gains of 4.2% and 8.9% for GPT-5.5, respectively. Notably, these improvements are obtained without degrading non-motion understanding, highlighting the robustness of MaP. These results demonstrate that MaP provides a simple and effective solution for enhancing motion-centric video reasoning without model training or architectural modification. Project page:https://github.com/SunVictor23/MaP.
Xikai Sun, Kebin Liu, Haotian Wang +3
Tsinghua University, Beijing, China · JD Logistics, Beijing, China
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in video temporal grounding with reinforcement learning for generating reasoning paths. However, existing models often produce superficial reasoning, which offers limited guidance for precise temporal localization. This limitation stems from (1) inefficient random exploration and (2) reward functions that focus solely on the answer correctness while ignoring reasoning quality. To address these issues, we propose TaRO (Temporal-Aware Reasoning Optimization), a framework that explicitly enhances the model's ability of thinking with time. First, we introduce a Constructive Reasoning Exploration that leverages pre-generated dense captions to construct reasoning paths grounded in explicit visual cues and timestamps, enabling efficient exploration of high-quality time-aware reasoning. Second, to evaluate reasoning quality, we design a Temporal-Sensitivity Reward. High-quality reasoning should be anchored to specific events and timestamps. If the event boundary under thinking is disrupted, such reasoning should become invalid, leading to a drop in the logit of the reasoning path. We utilize this drop as a critique of reasoning quality. Finally, TaRO follows a progressive curriculum, which starts by utilizing this reward to select better constructed reasoning paths, and evolves to a free exploration phase where the model autonomously generates effective reasoning. Experiments demonstrate that TaRO achieves state-of-the-art performance on VTG benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/oceanflowlab/TaRO.
Minghang Zheng, Zihao Yin, Yi Yang +2
Wangxuan Institute of Computer Technology, Peking University · Central Media Technology Institute, Huawei Technologies Ltd. · State Key Laboratory of General Artificial Intelligence, Peking University.
While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown remarkable success across a wide range of tasks, long-form video understanding remains a significant challenge. In this study, we focus on video understanding by MLLMs. This task is challenging because processing a full stream of RGB frames is computationally intractable and highly redundant, as self-attention have quadratic complexity with sequence length. In this paper, we propose ReMoRa, a video MLLM that processes videos by operating directly on their compressed representations. A sparse set of RGB keyframes is retained for appearance, while temporal dynamics are encoded as a motion representation, removing the need for sequential RGB frames. These motion representations act as a compact proxy for optical flow, capturing temporal dynamics without full frame decoding. To refine the noise and low fidelity of block-based motions, we introduce a module to denoise and generate a fine-grained motion representation. Furthermore, our model compresses these features in a way that scales linearly with sequence length. We demonstrate the effectiveness of ReMoRa through extensive experiments across a comprehensive suite of long-video understanding benchmarks. ReMoRa outperformed baseline methods on multiple challenging benchmarks, including LongVideoBench, NExT-QA, and MLVU.