Persistent Magnitude Homology for Quantitative Equational Theories

The SAIR Mathematics Distillation Challenge on Equational Theories asks a solver to classify whether one magma identity implies another and, for either verdict, to return a certificate accepted by a deterministic Lean judge. We present a single-file solver organized as a cheapest-first cascade. Its false branch combines coefficient tests over structured algebra families, bounded finite-model search, an explicit central-groupoid witness, and several infinite-carrier witnesses. Its true branch is a proof-producing ordered unit superposition procedure with Knuth-Bendix ordering, bidirectional demodulation, indexing, memoised substitution, and anytime size deepening. Search results remain outside the trusted base: successful derivations are replayed as small Lean terms, and countermodels are rechecked by the competition judge. The frozen solver is a 189,504-byte Python file with SHA-256 f2392533c9f4c03b.... In local runs through official judge revision 2848228, it produced accepted certificates for all 1,889 rows of the six public sets with no language-model calls. Separate measurements recorded full agreement on the 800 published Stage 1 evaluation-distribution problems, 100 accepted rows in the canonical Marathon manifest without tokens, and 200 accepted rows in the hosted playground. These are regression and playground measurements, not a leaderboard result and not evidence about a hidden set. All quantitative claims are tied to immutable result ledgers; the paper makes no completeness or comparative-superiority claim.

Detecting that a stream of high-dimensional embeddings has changed is usually framed as a choice of statistic. We give a scale law that constrains any moment-based choice and test it against topological alternatives. The law: certifying a feature of spatial scale eps carrying mass fraction f requires polynomial tests of degree N* >= log(1/f)/(2 eps), proved via the Chebyshev extremal problem; a Gauss-quadrature construction gives N* >= 4b-1 for a b-scale topology, so cost is set by feature fineness, not feature count. The law is one-sided: we exhibit an annulus whose mean, covariance and all fourth-order moments equal those of a filled disk, yet H_1 is nonzero. Its practical content is a calibration rule. The upper bound is attained by Gaussian test functions, the RKHS witness of an RBF kernel, so the law predicts which bandwidth an MMD test should use: the feature scale. On real embedding streams we measure sigma*/eps with median 1.12 (IQR 1.01-1.52, n=26) over three settings and three scales, and a data-driven bandwidth reaches AUC >= 0.95. Against an adversary optimised against the defender's statistics (mean, covariance, k-NN, kurtosis), only a bandwidth-matched kernel test still detects. For persistent homology the verdict is mixed and depends on choices usually left implicit. The summary matters more than the filtration: total persistence attains recall 0.75 at FPR 1% where the first persistence landscape attains 0.00. What survives is a cost gap, not a power gap: where persistence works it costs 116x kurtosis, which works at least as well. We conclude not that topological summaries are useless, but that on this task a kernel test whose bandwidth the law sets dominates them.

Transfer learning presumes that a representation learned on source tasks carries structure that remains usable on related target tasks. Standard evaluations probe this through target accuracy or distributional discrepancy, yet leave unspecified which structural invariant is meant to transfer. We supply that invariant categorically. A source task category $\mathcal A$, a target task category $\mathcal B$, and a task-change functor $J:\mathcal A\to\mathcal B$ determine, for every invariant-valued source representation $F:\mathcal A\to\mathcal V$, the universal transferred invariant $\operatorname{Lan}J F$. Given a target invariant $G:\mathcal B\to\mathcal V$, we define the transfer discrepancy $\operatorname{Comp}J(F,G)=\sup{b\in\operatorname{Ob}(\mathcal B)} d{\mathcal V}\bigl((\operatorname{Lan}_J F)(b),G(b)\bigr)$, evaluating transfer not by an objectwise comparison of source and target, but by comparing the target invariant against the one forced by the prescribed task transformation. We prove finite cokernel formulas for $(\operatorname{Lan}_J F)(b)$ in chain complexes and persistence modules, indexed by the comma category $J\downarrow b$. For persistence-valued finite-type one-parameter invariants, the discrepancy is computed exactly by bottleneck distances between barcodes. Controlled experiments on neural latent point clouds then test whether the score recovers the correct task functor and flags representation collapses that preserve classification accuracy while destroying transfer-relevant topology.