Modeling Claim Dependency Structure for Patent Litigation Prediction with Graph Attention Networks
Organizations: Graduate School of Information Science University of Hyogo · Graduate School of Information Science University of Hyogo Center for Computational Science, RIKEN
Abstract
Patent litigation imposes substantial costs on firms and distorts R&D incentives, making early risk identification a practically important task. While prior work has applied BERT-based models to patent claim text, two fundamental limitations remain: flat sequence encoding loses the dependency structure between independent and dependent claims that legally determines patent scope, and feeding the entire claim set to a single encoder discards legally critical text. A six-model ablation on 1.34 million USPTO utility patents confirms that per-claim encoding, graph connectivity, attention, and Attentional Aggregation each provide independent, additive predictive value. We propose ClaimGAT, a Graph Attention Network that encodes each claim independently, constructs a directed claim dependency graph, processes it with GATConv layers, and aggregates independent claims via Attentional Aggregation to yield both a litigation risk score and claim-level gate weights that enable post-hoc structural analysis. ClaimGAT achieves an AUC-ROC of 0.818 and a lift of 4.89x at the top 10%, using only information observable at the time of patent grant. It reveals a tendency in high-risk patents for structural selection and content sensitivity to diverge, a pattern consistent with defensive claim drafting.
Figures & tables
| Model | AUC-ROC | AUC-PR | [email protected]% | Lift@1% | Lift@5% | Lift@10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta | 0.723 | 0.0302 | 6.75 | 5.51 | 3.78 | 3.28 |
| Bert_Concat | 0.751 | 0.0507 | 13.58 | 11.15 | 6.01 | 4.22 |
| Bert_Split | 0.784 | 0.0586 | 14.81 | 12.13 | 6.25 | 4.24 |
| ClaimGCN | 0.792 | 0.0538 | 13.33 | 11.35 | 6.30 | 4.43 |
| ClaimGAT-IC | 0.806 | 0.0651 | 17.04 | 12.96 | 6.81 | 4.68 |
| ClaimGAT | 0.818 | 0.0668 | 15.64 | 12.42 | 6.63 | 4.89 |
Legal Judgment Prediction
Legal judgment prediction uses computational models to forecast court outcomes from case facts, legal arguments, statutes, and precedents.
See all 29 papers