Three-Phase Scribble-Adaptive Curriculum Learning for autoPETV Grand Challenge

Automated lesion segmentation in whole-body PET/CT is complicated by the variety of physiological tracer uptake patterns and by the differing appearance of lesions across tracers. The autoPET/CT V challenge addresses this by making segmentation interactive: user scribbles marking foreground and background are supplied alongside the image, and the algorithm is expected to exploit them. We present our submission, a scribble-conditioned residual encoder U-Net operating on four input channels: CT, PET, and a sparse scribble map for each of foreground and background. The network is initialised from the autoPET-III winning weights and extended from two to four input channels, with the two scribble channels zero-initialised so that the pretrained representation is preserved exactly at initialisation. Every model is fine-tuned per fold from the corresponding autoPET-III fold checkpoint, so that no validation case is seen during pretraining. PET intensities are normalised against a per-scan aorta blood-pool reference derived from a CT segmentation, which removes tracer- and centre-specific scaling without requiring lesion labels. At inference the five fold models are ensembled by averaging their softmax outputs per sliding-window patch, before Gaussian-weighted stitching. On the challenge's five-fold split, with each fold evaluated on its own validation cases, mean Dice is 0.554 and mean lesion-level F1 is 0.528 without scribbles, rising to 0.751 and 0.733 after five correction rounds. About 85% of that gain follows the first scribble, and the spread between fold models narrows five-fold over the same rounds, so interaction largely compensates for how well or badly a given model segments unaided.

Interactive lesion segmentation in whole-body PET/CT requires a model to provide a strong initial prediction while also responding efficiently to sparse corrective scribbles during inference. This setting is particularly challenging because tracer distributions, physiological uptake patterns, lesion appearance, and acquisition characteristics differ substantially between FDG and PSMA studies. We present TRIAGE, Tracer-aware Refinement via Interactive Anatomy-Guided sEgmentation. The core backbone is a 3D STU-Net initialized through masked autoencoding pre-training with an asynchronous masking strategy, aiming to learn transferable anatomical and cross-modal representations before task-specific fine-tuning. In parallel, we train an auxiliary organ segmentation model whose predictions provide explicit anatomical context and help distinguish physiological uptake from malignant lesions. A dedicated tracer classifier first routes each study to an FDG- or PSMA-specific branch. Within each branch, a first-stage segmentation model consumes CT, PET, and organ context to generate an initial lesion mask. The initial prediction is then combined with cumulative foreground/background scribbles and refined by a second interactive segmentation network. The FDG and PSMA branches share the same overall processing pipeline but are trained independently to account for tracer-specific appearance and error modes. We additionally employ curriculum-style training and model ensembling to improve robustness across interaction steps and heterogeneous cohorts. Experiments are conducted using the official AutoPET V data and ten-fold split; quantitative results, ablations, and final test-set performance are left as placeholders to be completed after the challenge evaluation. Code: https://github.com/Liiiii2101/AUTOPET2026-MEDAI.

We report the design and results of the third autoPET challenge (MICCAI 2024), which benchmarked automated lesion segmentation in whole-body PET/CT under a compositional generalization setting. Training data comprised 1,014 [18F]-FDG PET/CT studies from the University Hospital Tübingen and 597 [18F]/[68Ga]-PSMA PET/CT studies from the LMU University Hospital Munich, constituting the largest publicly available annotated PSMA PET/CT dataset to date. The held-out test set of 200 studies covered four tracer-center combinations, two of which represented unseen compositional pairings. A complementary data-centric award category isolated the contribution of data handling strategies by restricting participants to a fixed baseline model. Seventeen teams submitted 27 algorithms, predominantly nnU-Net-based 3D networks with PET/CT channel concatenation. The top-ranked algorithm achieved a mean DSC of 0.66, FNV of 3.18 mL, and FPV of 2.78 mL across all four test conditions, improving DSC by 8% and reducing the false-negative volume by 5 mL relative to the provided baseline. Ranking was stable across bootstrap resampling and alternative ranking schemes for the top tier. Beyond the benchmark, we provide an in-depth analysis of segmentation performance at the patient and lesion level. Three main conclusions can be drawn: (1) in-domain multitracer PET/CT segmentation is sufficient and probably approaching reader agreement; (2) compositional generalization to unseen tracer-center combinations remains an open problem mainly driven by systematic volume overestimation; (3) heterogeneity and case difficulty drive performance variation substantially more than the choice of algorithm among top-ranked teams.