The Variance of Thought: Policy Variance, Critical Forks, and Local Credit Assignment
Abstract
Long-horizon language-model tasks --- multi-step reasoning and tool-using agents alike --- are limited by credit assignment. We analyze it through the policy variance , which in a deterministic MDP is the sole source of return variance and is injected in discrete pulses at states we call critical forks. Three results follow. (i) Policy variance is a discovery budget: observing an action of advantage requires draws, a bound that is exact on the canonical two-point fork. (ii) Policy variance is bounded by the policy's Gini dispersion, , a rollout-free necessary condition for criticality computable from logits alone. (iii) The remaining horizon sets the estimation cost: at a fork whose downstream success probability is , the Monte Carlo advantage estimate has signal-to-noise ratio of order , so its sample cost scales as --- a cost that branched sampling shares. Bootstrapping removes it by converting a product of survival probabilities into a sum, provided the value representation is multiplicatively accurate, which argues for log-value parameterization.
Credit Assignment in RL
Credit assignment in reinforcement learning studies how to trace rewards and failures back to the actions, states, or agents that caused them.
See all 219 papers