Exploring Dowker Homology for Sentence Similarity

The standard way to compare two text embeddings is cosine similarity. Scattered studies report that a different metric does better, but never pin down the geometric condition that decides when, or why. We settle both with a comprehensive empirical study: nineteen parameter-free similarity metrics on nineteen encoders, from compact sentence transformers up to seven-billion-parameter large language models, across seven datasets. The answer is geometric. When an encoder spreads its variance evenly across directions, cosine is the best parameter-free choice and no other metric helps by a usable margin. When the variance concentrates into a few dominant directions, a property known as anisotropy, rank-based and L1-type metrics beat cosine by a clear margin. The absolute gain is modest, but because cosine starts low on these encoders it is a sizable relative improvement, around twenty percent on average and largest where cosine is weakest. What decides this is the geometry of the embedding space, not how the model was trained: where the two disagree, the metric follows the geometry. One number, the fraction of variance held by the single most dominant dimension, predicts how much the alternatives help across all nineteen encoders, with a rank correlation of 0.86 and a linear correlation of 0.95. To test this as the cause rather than a correlate, we project out the dominant directions: cosine recovers and the advantage of the other metrics nearly vanishes, but only on the encoders that were anisotropic to begin with. The effect is directional, not magnitude based, since it survives normalizing every vector to unit length. Among parameter-free metrics, then, cosine is the right tool wherever an encoder is well spread, which includes the fine-tuned embedders commonly deployed for retrieval, and we give a one-number diagnostic for when it is not.

The paper studies the local geometry of embedding clouds induced by controlled local classes of semantically close sentences. The central question is how controlled paraphrase-like semantic variation is organized in sentence embedding space and whether this local structure can be explicitly modeled by low-degree fitted carriers. We introduce a local geometric modeling scheme based on affine, quadratic, and cubic fitted models. We also use a surface-based latent probing procedure that constructs synthetic latent points in a reduced local PCA space with respect to the fitted carrier. The procedure is intended as an offline method for representation-space analysis, local manifold modeling, and geometry-aware latent probing. Generated latent points are evaluated using criteria that measure consistency with the fitted surface, preservation of neighborhood structure, agreement with the empirical distribution, stability of Hessian-based second-order shape descriptors, and stability of fitted-model coefficients. Experiments on controlled sets of semantically close sentences show that nonlinear local models describe embedding clouds more accurately than affine models. Surface-based generation provides strong fitted-geometry fidelity, including surface consistency, Hessian-based shape consistency, and coefficient consistency. Downstream experiments show that geometric validity of synthetic latent points does not automatically translate into improved classification performance. The results support explicit local geometric modeling of sentence embedding space and highlight the need to distinguish geometric validity from discriminative utility. As a resource contribution, we introduce CoPaGE-300K, a controlled template-based dataset of semantically close sentence variants with slot-level annotations and precomputed sentence embeddings.

Scaled dot product attention conflates directional alignment and vector magnitude, limiting its effectiveness as a similarity metric in Transformer models. We introduce L1 augmented attention, a simple and computationally parallelizable modification that subtracts a learned, head specific L1 distance between queries and keys from the dot product score. This hybrid similarity captures complementary geometric information. Dot product rewards directional alignment, while L1 penalizes coordinate deviations. To reduce the cost of L1 computation, we project queries and keys into low dimensional subspaces whose parameters specialize to preserve informative L1 structure. Evaluated on WikiText 2 using a compact transformer, L1 augmented attention achieves up to a 14.5% reduction in perplexity over the original transformer baseline and outperforms an RBF L2 kernel. Analysis of norm variance and learned L1 weights reveals distinct geometric roles across layers and strong head level specialization. These results demonstrate that enriching attention with L1 geometry provides a principled and effective improvement to similarity computation in modern language models, with practical benefits for both accuracy and parallel efficiency.