cs.CVAug 24, 2026
SaveResults of the 1st Asynchronous CASTLE Challenge at the Joint Egocentric Vision Workshop in Conjunction with CVPR 2026
Organizations: Dublin City University Dublin, Ireland · JOANNEUM RESEARCH Graz, Austria · IT University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark · University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands ·
Abstract
This report summarizes the contributions and results of the 1st Asynchronous CASTLE Challenge at the Joint Egocentric Vision Workshop in conjunction with CVPR 2026.
Figures & tables
| Team | Correct Answers | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| WDL | 108 | 0.584 |
| MARS | 105 | 0.568 |
| TAHAKOM | 101 | 0.546 |
| CuriosAI (SVA) | 92 | 0.497 |
| CuriosAI (TMKG) | 65 | 0.351 |
Table 1: Official Challenge Results
| Teams answered correctly | Number of Questions |
| 0 | 9 |
| 1 | 34 |
| 2 | 48 |
| 3 | 47 |
| 4 | 35 |
| 5 | 12 |
Table 2: Aggregate histogram over correctly answered questions and teams.
More in this topic
Egocentric Video Understanding
Egocentric video understanding studies how AI interprets first-person video to recognize actions, track interactions, reason about space and time, and assist users.
See all 203 papersCASTLE 2026 asks 185 multiple-choice questions over 600+ hours of synchronized multi-view egocentric video. We explore two approaches on top of a shared multimodal preprocessing layer, including per-person timelines, speaker-resolved transcripts, and multi-VLM caption ensembles. Approach A, SVA: Search-Verify-Answer, is a three-stage pipeline that hierarchically narrows to a primary window, verifies sub-windows with a VLM under four anti-confabulation rules, and fuses evidence with an LLM judge under an evidence-priority hierarchy. Approach B, TMKG: Temporal-Multimodal-Knowledge-Graph, is the contrast: it builds a temporal multimodal knowledge graph, locates a primary cell via graph search, and produces the final answer with a single grounded VLM. SVA reaches a leaderboard accuracy of 0.50 and is our final challenge submission; TMKG reaches 0.35.
CASTLE2026 Team WDL Technical Report
The CASTLE Challenge @ EgoVis 2026 evaluates long-form egocentric video question answering over 600+ hours of multi-perspective recordings. Each four-choice question requires evidence from videos, transcripts, auxiliary photos, people, days, rooms, and temporal context. We propose an evidence-aware multimodal reasoning pipeline based on Qwen. Our system parses question hints, retrieves ASR chunks, attaches auxiliary images, samples candidate video frames, and routes questions into static visual, speech/text, temporal, and mixed types with specialized prompts. Multiple inference passes are aggregated by confidence-weighted voting and converted into the official Codabench format. In ablation, LoRA improves the score from 0.21 to 0.50, and more sampled frames further raise it to 0.58. Our final system ranks first in the CASTLE Challenge @ EgoVis 2026.
MARS: Technical Report for the CASTLE Challenge at EgoVis 2026
This report presents MARS, short for Multimodal Agentic Reasoning with Source selection, our system for the CASTLE Challenge at EgoVis 2026. Participants must answer 185 closed-form questions over the CASTLE 2024 dataset. In contrast to prior single-video egocentric benchmarks, CASTLE requires reasoning over four days of activity, 15 synchronized perspectives, official transcripts, and multiple auxiliary modalities, including personal photos, auxiliary videos, gaze, thermal imagery, and heartrate measurements. MARS therefore treats the task as an agentic evidence-selection problem over multimodal sources rather than a purely text-only pipeline. MARS first follows the official CASTLE directory organization to build evidence memories from two primary sources, videos and transcripts, and four auxiliary sources, gaze, heartrate, photos, and thermal imagery. Long videos are converted into captions and DeepSeek-based summaries only because CASTLE videos are too long to fit directly into the model context for every question; this step compresses temporal evidence while keeping photos and other auxiliary media available as source-specific evidence. At inference time, a GPT-5.4 decision agent repeatedly chooses whether to continue reasoning, request a specific missing modality, produce an answer, or fall back to a random option when the evidence remains insufficient. The resulting system achieved second place on the final CASTLE Challenge leaderboard. Our codes are available at https://github.com/Hyu-Zhang/MARS.