Organizations: Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, 721302, West Bengal, India · Department of CSIS, BITS Pilani K K Birla Goa Campus (on lien to Center of AI and SuperComputing, Mahindra University, Hyderabad), Goa, 403726, India · Siebel School of Computing and Data Science, University of Illinois Urbana–Champaign, Champaign, IL 61801, USA · Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Koramangala, Bengaluru 560034, India · Observatoire de Paris, LERMA, College ’ de France, PSL University, Sorbonne University, CNRS, Paris, France-75014
Dual active galactic nuclei (DAGN) mark a critical phase in the evolution of merging galaxies and the pairing of supermassive black holes, yet they remain difficult to identify in large imaging surveys because of projection effects and limited spatial resolution. Compact foreground stars and unresolved substructure can mimic dual nuclei through chance superposition, complicating automated detection. We revisit the 46,061 galaxies flagged but rejected as DAGN candidates by the GOTHIC pipeline, primarily because the two nuclei fell within the SDSS fibre aperture or exceeded its separation threshold. We train a supervised deep-learning framework based on the YOLOv11 oriented-bounding-box architecture on annotated SDSS imaging to separate genuine dual nuclei from foreground stellar contaminants and other spurious alignments. The final model attains a validation precision of 0.919, recall of 0.905, and F1 of 0.912, and yields 29,605 dual-nucleus candidates after removing star-dominated and blended detections. Structured visual inspection indicates that 54.5--62% are consistent with genuine dual nuclei, implying ∼(1.4--1.8)×104 plausible systems. Cross-calibrating the YOLO separation against the deterministic GOTHIC centroid measurement and restricting to the compact regime (d≤6.87′′) gives a conservative subset of ∼13,672 candidates, reaching calibrated separations of ∼0.56′′. Spectroscopy of the most compact (≤1 kpc) systems shows spectra dominated by stellar absorption, with no resolved double-peaked emission, so confirmation requires higher-resolution follow-up. The catalogue is a statistically refined list of candidates, not confirmed DAGN. Nonetheless, deep-learning detection substantially reduces contamination and expands the plausible DAGN census.
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA. · Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA. · Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. +1
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, USA · Company Name, Location, Country · European Space Agency (ESA), European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC), Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain +4
Jun 17, 2026·V. Samuel Pérez-Díaz, Vinay L. Kashyap, Joshua D. Ingram +6
Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, 60 Garden St, Cambridge MA 02138, USA · Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 150 Western Ave, Allston, MA 02134, USA · Universidad del Rosario, School of Engineering, Science and Technology, Cll. 12C No. 6-25, Bogot´a, Colombia +5