eess.IVAug 25, 2026

Unified-protocol voxel-level pulmonary embolism annotations for three public CT angiography datasets

Authors: Qihang Sun, Zhongxiao Liu, Bailiang Jian, Shenman Qiu, Jingyuan Wang, Lei Zhang, Lixiang Xie, Jiazhen Pan, +1 more

Organizations: Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany · Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Munich, Germany · Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China · Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China · Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China

Abstract

Reliable clot-volume quantification and subsequent risk assessment in pulmonary embolism depend on precise segmentation of emboli on computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Deep learning models for this task must be trained on accurate voxel-level labels. The three public datasets that provide such labels were annotated under different protocols, and some of their studies contain unlabeled emboli or labels that are discontinuous across slices. This Data Descriptor presents voxel-level pulmonary embolism annotations for 149 of the 166 studies in these datasets. A primary rater drew all annotations under a single protocol. A thoracic radiologist with more than 20 years of experience reviewed and revised them. Three raters at three different centers independently annotated a subset of 15 studies. The subset was selected by source dataset and embolus location. Technical validation quantifies volumetric agreement with the source annotations, changes in within-mask attenuation, and inter-rater agreement on the subset. The dataset is intended to allow segmentation models to be developed and compared under a common reference standard.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 27, 2026cs.CV

A Patient-Specific Pulmonary Arterial Tree Digital Twin to Extract Pulmonary Embolism Biomarkers

Pulmonary embolism, the obstruction of a pulmonary artery by a blood clot, is one of the leading causes of acute cardiovascular syndrome. In clinical practice, therapeutic decisions after diagnosis via computed tomography pulmonary angiography rely on risk stratification, which categorizes 30-day mortality risk into three categories. This stratification depends on the right-to-left ventricular diameter ratio and blood levels of two cardiac enzymes. However, blood biomarkers are not always available in emergency settings, and manual calculation of established severity scores - such as Qanadli and Mastora - is time-consuming and rarely performed in clinical routine practice. This study introduces an automated pipeline that models a directed graph representation of the pulmonary arterial tree, labeling its hierarchical structure and characterizing pulmonary embolism. The pipeline derives image-based biomarkers, including local artery-level features (morphological information, hierarchical position, clot volume, and resulting obstruction) and global patient-level biomarkers such as automatically calculated severity scores (Qanadli and Mastora) and the total embolic volume distribution by lobes and hierarchical levels. Using artificial-intelligence-generated binary masks of arteries, emboli, lungs, and lobes, it creates a patient digital twin of the arterial structure. Validation of the pipeline through comparison to an existing pipeline, anatomical expectations, and manual severity score calculations demonstrates the pipeline's ability to automatically generate anatomically accurate digital twins and severity scores with strong agreement. This supports the potential of these image-derived biomarkers to automatically provide rapid, precise information on thrombotic burden and spatial clot distribution.
Jun 24, 2026cs.CV

Pulmonary Embolism Risk Stratification from CTPA and Medical Records: Vascular Graphs Are Not All You Need

Risk stratification for pulmonary embolism (PE) is critical for clinical decision-making. Stratification guidelines are based on patient medical records, parameters measured from computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and blood tests. However, blood tests are often missing in routine practice. This work studies whether state-of-the-art models can accurately classify risk stratification from only medical records and biomarkers extracted from CTPA images. We benchmark different approaches to combine medical records and cardiac biomarkers with rich pulmonary vascular information; we add vascular biomarkers to tabular models and apply graph neural networks (GNNs) on the vascular tree's intrinsic graph representation. We use a private dataset (n=353) with uniquely complete data for PE risk stratification. Our results show that, among global features, medical records and cardiac biomarkers are the most significant predictors, while vascular biomarkers do not further improve stratification. Even more surprising, even GNNs on vascular graphs fail to outperform strong tabular baseline on global features. We consider hypotheses, on both models and data, that could explain this suboptimal performance. Our investigation suggests that, counter-intuitively, vascular graphs might hold no discriminative information for PE risk stratification. Code is available from https://github.com/creatis-myriad/GENESIS.
Jun 21, 2026cs.AI

Efficient Multimodal Clinical Question Answering for Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a high risk cardiopulmonary condition whose management requires both timely diagnosis and reliable assessment of future clinical risk. Because PE care routinely combines computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), radiology interpretation, and longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) evidence, it provides a clinically meaningful setting for evaluating compact multimodal language models. In this work, we build a benchmark using efficient multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on INSPECT, a multimodal PE dataset containing 23,248 CTPA studies from 19,402 patients. We formulate eight diagnostic and prognostic tasks as structured clinical question answering problems and evaluate on typical efficient MLLMs under CTPA-Only, EHR-Only, and CTPA+EHR settings with zero-shot and few-shot prompting. Results show that Gemma4 E4B and Gemma4 E2B perform more strongly when EHR evidence is available, especially under CTPA+EHR input. Task level analysis further shows that PE diagnosis achieves higher performance than prognostic tasks, particularly readmission prediction. These observations suggest that compact multimodal models have the great potential in early stage PE risk detection and explanation.